Skip to main content

1-20 of 151 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Adam Ingram
Subject X
Contracts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Ingram, Adam (151)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Contracts (151)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Ministry of Defence has agreed to lower the threshold for the advertising of MOD contracts. This will give greater encouragement to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to enter MOD business and is designed to further enhance the visibility and transparency of the UK defence equipment market. Currently ‘non-warlike’ requirements...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
30 April 2007
Reference
459 c31-2WS
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to announce that QinetiQ have been awarded the contract to operate the subsonic target element of the Combined Aerial Target Service (CATS) programme worth £364.7 million. This contract marks a significant step forward towards the delivery of the CATS project. In line with Defence Industrial Strategy it...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
454 c95WS
House
House of Commons

The Government have accepted the findings of the Review Board for Government Contracts as detailed in their report of the 2006 annual review of the profit formula for non-competitive Government contracts. I will be placing a copy of the report in the Library of the House. The recommendations will be...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
447 c99WS
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to announce that, following a competition, QinetiQ has been selected as the preferred bidder to supply and operate the subsonic target element of the combined aerial target service (CATS) programme. Contract award is expected to take place after a period of final negotiations. This decision marks a...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
16 March 2006
Reference
443 c103WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of defence contracts were awarded to BAE Systems in (a) 2002–03, (b) 2003–04 and (c) 2004–05; what the value was in each case; and how many were won through competitive tenders.

Asked by
John P Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
443 c869-70W;443 c869-70W; 54098
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the future of work being carried out at the former Chorley Royal Ordnance site for his Department's contracts.

Asked by
Lindsay Hoyle (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2006
Reference
50173; 442 c1586W;442 c1586W
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on defence procurement.

Lead member
Adam Ingram
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c491-569
House
House of Commons

I am sorry for interrupting, but I went through that entire process. I put the rifle under intensive test by soldiers and I have a vivid memory of a Royal Marine sergeant saying that it was the best rifle he had ever handled, and a paratrooper sergeant saying the same....

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c549
House
House of Commons

As Minister for the armed forces I have the privilege of working with and meeting our servicemen and women on a day-to-day basis and know that they are the finest in the world. The nation is fortunate to have them. In an uncertain and difficult environment, they stand ready to...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c491-2
House
House of Commons

Very much so, Mr. Deputy Speaker. But we have to have set our procurement strategy against the environment and theatres in which our people operate. I was setting the scene, but I shall come on to the specific issue.

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c492
House
House of Commons

We would need to look at the particular question. We constantly answer a range of questions. If I remember correctly, we said that some of the issues are held in commercial confidence, for very good reasons—we could enter the next phase of negotiations for tranche 3. I do not know...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c493
House
House of Commons

I want to make some progress. I have hardly started to talk about procurement yet and I am sure that the hon. Gentleman has some points to make about that. I have not yet mentioned any particular procurement streams, but if he is intervening on the general context in which...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c493
House
House of Commons

I accept all that, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was of course coming to the conclusion of the context in which our people operate and I then intended to talk about the need to ensure that we have battle-winning equipment to ensure their success. I was explaining that the environment into...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c492-3
House
House of Commons

Of course I will, Mr. Deputy Speaker. At all times I try to keep within the rules of the House. The hon. Member for Lancaster and Wyre (Mr. Wallace) is wholly wrong, however. The figures have been made available; indeed, I understand that parliamentary questions have been answered today. I...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c492
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c507
House
House of Commons

I just want to get the record straight. We recognise the issues on procurement, but perhaps the hon. Gentleman would like to comment on the fact that in 1997, when the Conservative party left office, the NAO found that the Conservative Government’s top 25 defence procurement projects were likely to...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c507-8
House
House of Commons

Two billion dollars.

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c514
House
House of Commons

In my opening statement, I said that 100 British personnel in Iraq had now lost their lives, 77 as a direct result of hostile action. To be more accurate, the position is that 77 have been killed in action, including as a direct result of hostile action. I am grateful...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c562
House
House of Commons

I hear that described as plan B. As I have said before, we do not plan for failure. We plan for success and put all our efforts into achieving it. What we are planning is the best aircraft of its type, for various technical reasons. The question of marinising Typhoon...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c503
House
House of Commons

I thought I had answered the question, but let me try again. We are confident that we will succeed in what we have set out to achieve. That must be the main thrust of our argument and we must impress it upon our US allies. We are the main contributor...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2006
Reference
442 c503-4
House
House of Commons