Skip to main content

1-20 of 70 results for subject:Abuse

Member X
Baroness Hughes of Stretford

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hughes of Stretford, Baroness (70)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I, too, congratulate the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Leicester on securing this debate on this very important topic. It is a privilege to speak after the knowledgeable contributions of so many colleagues. While recent cases have brought this issue to the fore, there has in fact been a...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2011
Reference
724 c324-5GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many children have been removed from their parents following a single incident of child harm in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
491 c1140W; 270215
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what (a) statutory and (b) other obligations there are upon him to investigate allegations of child abuse in children's homes.

Asked by
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2009
Reference
491 c897W; 271031
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families if he will investigate allegations that child abuse has taken place in the production of the Channel 4 programme Boys and Girls Alone; what representations (a) he and (b) other Ministers in his Department have made to Channel 4...

Asked by
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2009
Reference
489 c708W;489 c710W; 261530
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the number of children in West Chelmsford constituency abused while subject to a child protection plan in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Simon Burns (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2009
Reference
488 c1078-9W; 254754
House
House of Commons

I start by saying that I welcome the fact of this debate but regret the tone of it, which was set by the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton). We genuinely wanted a cross-party consensus that would demonstrate to the outside world the importance we all ascribe...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c809-11
House
House of Commons

I am sorry; I am going to finish. I apologise to the hon. Gentleman. I implore Opposition Members to rethink their position on the ContactPoint system. It is not of itself a guarantee, but without it we cannot be sure that we will not see another failure of information sharing...

Member
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c811
House
House of Commons

Child protection. Fourth Opposition Day debate (part 2). Motion negatived on division (292 votes to 198). Amendment agreed to on question.

Lead member
Tim Loughton
Answering member
Ed Balls
Department
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Opposition days
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c765-815;487 c765-816
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many children were abused whilst subject to a child protection plan in each of the last five years in (a) Hemel Hempstead and (b) Hertfordshire.

Asked by
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2009
Reference
487 c648W; 250600
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many children were abused whilst subject to a child protection plan in each of the last five years in (a) England, (b) the North East, (c) Tees Valley and (d) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland.

Asked by
Ashok Kumar (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c479W; 249827
House
House of Commons
Absolutely. I know that my hon. Friend takes a great interest in these issues in Blackpool, which faces particular challenges from people moving in and out of the area. Any issue that impairs an adult's ability to parent their child, whether it is domestic violence, substance misuse or a mental health problem, should raise questions about child protection or development in the minds of those working with the parent that should be explored. It is important that agencies that work with children work together with agencies that work with children and adults and that both ““think family”” rather than one or the other.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c11-2
House
House of Commons
I am sure that the hon. Gentleman enjoyed the performance. Unfortunately, I have not seen that production so I do not know how young the children are or how many are involved. However, I am sure that he would want to err on the side of caution, as would many parents. In the case of very young children—say, under seven—a fair few adults are needed to ensure their safety, not just because of the possibility of molestation but because there are many health and safety risks backstage. I will look at the issue and if there are matters to address, we will be happy to do so.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c12
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is the focus of the children's trusts, which we will strengthen to ensure the integration and close working together of all those agencies, which should take responsibility locally and together for whatever measures need to be taken to protect children in their area.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c13
House
House of Commons
Of course, one thing that we are doing is putting in additional resources for outreach workers to knock on doors and develop relationships with some of those disadvantaged families who find it difficult initially even to walk up to a children's centre. The Opposition would cut the funding for those outreach workers, and if that were to happen, the ability of children's centres to reach those families would be seriously impaired.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c12
House
House of Commons
In a sense, when it comes to political commitment the proof of the pudding is in the resources that political parties put into particular issues and the focus that they place on them. That is why I drew attention to the difference between the hon. Gentleman's party and mine—
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c12-3
House
House of Commons
It is not an either/or situation. That is the difference with this Government. We are committed to both those things, not one or the other. It is very important that social workers get the training that they need. Lord Laming is looking at that and the taskforce that we have set up is looking at it in detail. It is vital—this came directly from the Victoria Climbié inquiry—that when different people, such as social workers, health visitors and police officers, are working in a family, they know very quickly who else is involved so they can put their piece of the jigsaw into the whole picture. That has been the failing discovered in almost every inquiry into a child death. ContactPoint will do that—we are funding it, the Opposition will not.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c13
House
House of Commons
As far as we are aware, that instruction has been given, but I will write to the hon. Gentleman and clarify the situation for him.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c11
House
House of Commons
I thank my hon. Friend for that question. One way in which the 2004 legislation transformed safeguarding arrangements was that it introduced powers for Ministers to act and intervene, and we have recently seen those powers used very publicly. My officials went into Birmingham on 17 December, they have met council officials and they will be reporting to me shortly with recommendations for action in relation to that particular local authority, which, as he said, appears to be in serious difficulty.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c11
House
House of Commons
I thank the hon. Lady for that question—I know that she takes a great deal of interest in, and is very knowledgeable about, these issues. She will know that following the death of Victoria Climbié and Lord Laming's review, there was a wholesale radical transformation of local arrangements, with a focus on safeguarding. Those arrangements are largely working, but they depend on effective implementation in every local area. She is right to say that that crucially depends on the quality, experience and training of the people operating the system at every level. That is why we published the work force strategy; it is why my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced today the taskforce that will specifically examine the training needs of, and issues associated with the work of, social workers and their managers; and it is why we announced leadership training for directors of children's services and managers, to be provided through the National College for School Leadership. I know that the hon. Lady is alluding to smacking, but I am sure she would not wish to bracket together good parents who feel that sometimes it is necessary to smack with those who consistently abuse children. Although it is good that parents are moving away from smacking—I support that—we have no intention of criminalising the vast majority of parents, who do a very good job with their children.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c10-1
House
House of Commons
National data show that 29,200 children were the subject of a child protection plan at 31 March 2008. Children are given a plan where there are concerns about their safety and welfare as specified in the Government's guidance ““Working Together to Safeguard Children””, published in 2006. Some 45 per cent. of the plans arose from neglect, 25 per cent. from emotional abuse, 15 per cent. from physical abuse, 7 per cent. from sexual abuse and 8 per cent. from multiple abuses of children.
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 January 2009
Reference
487 c10
House
House of Commons