Skip to main content

1-19 of 19 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Gerald Howarth
Subject X
Industry

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Howarth, Gerald (19)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Industry (19)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May I make it absolutely clear to the Minister that he is completely wrong? It is terminological inexactitude to say that we have plans to cancel the carrier. I have set out our position on the carrier, which, if he reads his own Secretary of State's written answers, he will...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c221WH
House
House of Commons

I know that the wings are being made at Filton, but I am not aware of any other major components of the A400M being made in the north-west. What other components will be made there?

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c224WH
House
House of Commons

That is of great interest to people in Lancashire and, indeed, in the country generally, so would the Minister tell us what stage negotiations are at for tranche 3B and whether he has made up his mind on that yet?

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c223WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman knows perfectly well that our position is precisely the same as the Labour party's.

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c208WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman might like to correct himself. The Tornado was a joint effort involving the same partners—Britain, Germany and Italy. It was not just the Typhoon that was built in that way; it built on the Tornado experience.

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c204WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is clearly anticipating much of what I shall say, but I want to put him out of his misery—or rather to disrupt his joy at spreading false rumours. He has picked up a quotation from the Lancashire Evening Post. I have a copy of his leaflet. As...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c207-8WH
House
House of Commons

The leaflet was not passed on in that fashion. It was posted to me. Lorraine Fullbrook, who is the hon. Gentleman's doughty and feisty opponent—she has every prospect of succeeding him in this place—has, as he well knows, been resident in the area for five years. As the hon. Gentleman...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c208WH
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman thinks that he can save money by scrapping the Typhoon, he has failed completely to understand the argument I was deploying a few minutes ago: we require an air superiority fighter, which is precisely what the Typhoon is. It is also a top-class aircraft. It is...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c216-8WH
House
House of Commons

No, because I anticipate that the hon. Gentleman wants to ask why we have excluded Trident. We have excluded it for the very good reason that we believe that decisions have to be taken, unlike his party, which thinks that a Trident successor can be magicked up in a few...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c218-20WH
House
House of Commons

I accept what the hon. Gentleman says, but the United Kingdom needs to take a very robust stand with the United States. The relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom is in need of a bit of tender loving care. There have been a number of issues on...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c214-6WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right. That is the predicament facing whoever forms the next Government; obviously, I hope that it will be the Conservative party. I have no doubt that we will face immense challenges in determining the force structures that are required to meet not only today's immediate threats...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c216WH
House
House of Commons

It is customary on these occasions to congratulate the hon. Member who secured the debate, and I warmly congratulate the hon. Member for South Ribble (Mr. Borrow) on having done so. It is somewhat disappointing that so few Members from the north-west were able to join us on this occasion...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c213-4WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman continues to make such observations. In a written answer, the Secretary of State for Defence said:""We have been very clear since the publication of the Defence Green Paper that everything other than Trident is included in the Strategic Defence Review."—[Official Report, 8 March 2010; Vol. 507, c....

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c209WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister, who is shortly to leave Parliament, says not at all. It is a fact, and I can confirm it. Both parties will undertake a defence review. That review will consider all the options and force structures. That is what the nation requires. That is what the armed forces...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
507 c208-9WH
House
House of Commons
It is extraordinary that, at a time of unprecedented military activity, the Minister comes to the Dispatch Box to accept that under this Government, essential expenditure on R and D has halved. In addition, he will know that the head of the European Defence Agency has called for 20 per cent. of the EU nations’ defence research spending to be spent collectively. How much of the UK’s already reduced research budget does the MOD intend to spend in this way? Who will own the resulting intellectual property? Will this move not endanger our relationship with the United States? Will it not serve, moreover, to undermine a key principle of the defence industrial strategy to which the Secretary of State put his name—that we need to maintain certain key capabilities in the United Kingdom—or is the real truth that this is just further evidence that defence policy is now seen by the federalists as the best vehicle for securing the united states of Europe?
Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1197
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment the Government has made of the rules governing access to UK defence markets by foreign-owned companies; and whether the Government plans to make changes to the rules.

Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 July 2004
Reference
182384; 423 c996W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what areas are considered by his Department to be key industrial capabilities which the UK defence industry must maintain.

Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2004
Reference
170744; 421 c1352W
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on defence procurement. (Inc ref to HC 694 and HC 1194 2002/03)

Lead member
Adam Ingram
Answering member
Gerald Howarth
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
23 October 2003
Reference
411 c803-75
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, If he will make a statement on his policy concerning defence industry consolidation in Europe.
Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 1999
Reference
326 c13-4; 70499
House
House of Commons