Skip to main content

1-20 of 103 results for subject:Companies

Member X
David Howarth

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Howarth, David (103)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the Secretary of State for giving way on that particular point, because the penalties are a rather important aspect of the Bill. Does he agree that under existing legislation, unlimited fines are available, but the sentencing guidelines mean that the courts do not always take the offences as...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c948
House
House of Commons

I shall return, in my speech, to the point that the hon. and learned Gentleman raises. The point that I wish to put to him now is that the anxiety about the independence of the SFO, for example, is one of the issues that has been raised—more than once, I...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c959
House
House of Commons

May I put to the Secretary of State a point about this clause that was made in the other place? These services have a function that goes beyond national security: upholding the economic interests of the country. It has been suggested that it is not appropriate for the permission to...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c952
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister satisfied that the OECD will find that arrangement satisfactory, given its concern about the independence of the SFO in the light of the al-Yamamah case?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c981
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was trying to skirt around it as well as I could, but you are absolutely right: we cannot get any further into that without straying into an area where we should not go. It is good that the Government have got this far with...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c970-2
House
House of Commons

I do not want to go into the detail of that case, because it is now subject to the injunction that I mentioned. BAE has never admitted to corruption—to bribery—and only to technical offences under other legislation. The same is true in the United States. That is because the current...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c970
House
House of Commons

I am glad to have that clarification. That is a significant step forward by the Conservatives from the position put forward at least by their Back Benchers in the other place. If the issue is now only about the content of the guidance, we have made considerable progress, and I...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c969-70
House
House of Commons

I, too, welcome the Bill. I pay tribute to the hon. Member for City of York (Hugh Bayley) for his work over the years in bringing us to this point, and to my hon. Friend the Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) for his sterling efforts. In light of...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
506 c968-9
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way a second time. There is another problem. If he is forced to try to amend each Act one at a time, the courts might say that that confirms their general approach that unless a particular Act gives an exemption or changes the...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2009
Reference
495 c653
House
House of Commons

The Minister has been speaking for 26 minutes now. We know she opposes the Bill, but we do not know why. The hon. Member for Huntingdon was very clear that he opposed the Bill because it imposed costs on business. I support the Bill, as does the hon. Member for...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2009
Reference
495 c663
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on his persistence in bringing back the Bill, which I fully support; I have said so publicly, in debate, on several occasions. In fact, I support it so much that I might not even bother to try to catch your eye, Mr. Deputy Speaker. That...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 July 2009
Reference
495 c651
House
House of Commons

That this House urges the Government to better regulate car clamping companies; deplores the extortionate level of charges levied which are often ??125 or more for removing a clamp; further deplores the erroneous additional charges, including paying to return a car which has been impounded; is concerned that vulnerable individuals...

Primary sponsor
Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
2348; 2348A1
House
House of Commons

I will try to keep my remarks brief. The hon. Member for South Swindon (Anne Snelgrove) mentioned several of her constituents; perhaps I should start by mentioning one of mine. Sir David King is the former chief scientific adviser who got into a lot of trouble for describing climate change...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
477 c88-9
House
House of Commons

I once had a PhD student who did her thesis on small island states, but I do not have time to go into the full issue that the Minister raises. However, it is a different point about the overall starting point for reductions, not the share. The hon. Member for...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
477 c89-91
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman will be aware, of course, that the shadow price of carbon approach has been heavily criticised by a number of economists, and the Government are on the verge of abandoning it.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
477 c94
House
House of Commons

I hear what the Minister says about rejecting the approach of the House of Lords. However, is he willing to accept some limitation on the use of international trading to avoid the need—or requirement—to change what we do in this country? Surely we must be an example to the whole...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
477 c43
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the Government's decision to accept an amendment to the Climate Change Bill making it mandatory for large companies to report on their greenhouse gas emissions in their annual business review; congratulates the Government on recognising the need to ensure a level playing field amongst businesses on...

Primary sponsor
Elliot Morley (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
1618
House
House of Commons

Another problem with using the minimum wage is that it will not help two obvious groups of people: first, those whose overall pay is low because they are part-time, even though their hourly rate is greater than the minimum wage; and secondly, self-employed people such as jobbing builders and low-paid...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2008
Reference
475 c107
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that the Beer Orders, passed in 1989, were intended to increase competition in brewing, wholesaling and retailing; believes however that they have failed to do this, and indeed have instead concentrated ownership of British pubs in the hands of pub companies or Pubcos; notes that in...

Primary sponsor
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
3 April 2008
Reference
1328
House
House of Commons

Will the Solicitor-General give way?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2007
Reference
463 c49
House
House of Commons