Skip to main content

1-20 of 109 results for subject:Arrests

Member X
Viscount Hailsham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hailsham, Viscount (109)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, in the circumstances I shall confine my observations to Amendments 422A and 422B. Before I do so, I say that I strongly support the amendment just moved by the noble Baroness. Were she to divide the House on it, I would support it, but I gather that, perhaps...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc900-1
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Viscount Hailsham

422A: After Clause 207, insert the following new Clause—

“Support for terrorism: intention

(1) The Terrorism Act 2000 is amended as follows.

(2) In section 12 (support) after subsection (4), insert—

“(4A) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section unless the conduct alleged was done by that person...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc915-1006
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful for the support of the Liberal Democrat Benches, but for a similar reason to that advanced by the noble Baroness, I am not going to trouble the House by seeking to divide.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c916
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 423 which is in my name. The purpose of my amendment is to see if it is possible to effect a compromise between strongly held opinions. If a compromise is not possible, then subject to pre-emption, I could certainly support Amendments 422E, and...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc956-7
House
House of Lords

I am not sure that I accept that. It is certainly true that when I started practising at the Bar, which was a very long time ago, investigations were not conducted with great sensitivity, but the police service has advanced a long way from that. So I do not think—I...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c957
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to my noble friend for giving way, but I am afraid that he is wrong about the absence of suspicion. When I was a special constable 40 years ago—I do not have the experience of the noble Lord opposite—I would stand in Trafalgar Square and get...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1103
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, has said. This is really a matter of definition. We all agree that journalists should not be arrested while doing their job, but it is very difficult for a policeman to distinguish between A and B—

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1130
House
House of Lords

Yes, but I do not think the noble Baroness has focused on the point that a lot of demonstrators would represent themselves as journalists to avoid the prescriptive provisions of the Bill. That is what the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, was talking about, and he is wholly right.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1131
House
House of Lords

I appreciate that. I did not realise that the noble and learned Lord was intervening—I apologise for not sitting down at once. The point is surely that we are dealing with the need to protect journalists. The risk is that any demonstrator involved will say that they are a journalist...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will make three brief comments about these amendments. First, regarding the trigger points, I entirely agree with Amendments 56 and 60 from the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, which the noble and learned Lord spoke to. The reference to an injunction is particularly worrying because, for the reason...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1143
House
House of Lords

I interpreted that subsection to mean that the statement could be in writing if the person did not attend. Is that correct?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1146
House
House of Lords

My Lords, although those on this side of the House celebrate the scale of the Government’s success in December—a sentiment that may be shared by many on the Benches opposite, although covertly—it is important that we do not learn the wrong lessons.

Notwithstanding the earnest and sometimes frivolous contributions of the...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2020
Reference
801 cc248-250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I recognise the difficulties that the Border Force experiences in searching more vehicles passing through points of entry. Can more be done to search vehicles while they are on the ferries, where there would be more time? It might be possible in appropriate cases to use the staff...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2019
Reference
800 c802
House
House of Lords

I entirely understand, Mr. Speaker, and you are entirely right. Then would the Home Secretary explain why she has chosen to make this statement? Is it to enlarge her political life by giving the false impression of activity? If so, let me tell her that it will fool nobody at...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c32
House
House of Commons

Does the Home Secretary understand my puzzlement at the fact that she has chosen to make a statement that was wholly empty? She could say nothing at all about the arrest of the alleged terrorists because of the contempt of court rules that we all know about. What she could...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c31
House
House of Commons

Yesterday, Mr. Speaker, you said to the House in your statement that to the Speaker's Committee should be referred the matter of the seizure by the police of the material belonging to my hon. Friend the Member for Ashford (Damian Green) and that the report should be done as soon...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
4 December 2008
Reference
485 c130
House
House of Commons

Yesterday, Mr. Speaker, you told us two things in your statement: first, that there was not a warrant; and secondly, that the police failed to tell the Serjeant at Arms that she was entitled to refuse access. That was a breach of code B52 of the statutory codes. Furthermore, on...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2008
Reference
485 c148-9
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. Would you be kind enough to confirm that the police are not above the law? What has happened here is that they have entered this House without a warrant. They failed to tell the Serjeant at Arms that she could refuse that entry....

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 December 2008
Reference
485 c6
House
House of Commons

Much of the ground has been covered in the substantive debates on the Terrorism Act 2006, so I shall be brief. My hon. Friend the Member for Arundel and South Downs (Nick Herbert) said that he hoped that the code would be passed by the House, but I take a...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c286-7
House
House of Commons

I am sorry to interrupt, but I believe that it goes further than that. My understanding of the statute and of the Government’s commitment is that the period of detention will not and cannot be extended unless the House approves the code.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c279-80
House
House of Commons