Skip to main content

1-12 of 12 results for dept:"Public Accounts Commission"

Member X
Mike Hancock

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hancock, Mike (12)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am sure the hon. Gentleman could; he is being far too modest. On the hon. Gentleman's point about income tax and higher income tax payers, I am disappointed that we will not get anywhere near the amendments that I and others tabled on excluding higher income tax payers from...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c772
House
House of Commons

I honestly believe that the hon. Gentleman is in the market for a property in Wokingham, or if not Wokingham, Hart.

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c772
House
House of Commons

Once again, I am concerned about the lack of time, because I would have loved to have had a proper debate on amendments 59 and 60, which go to the heart of the problems we face. The amendments, which were tabled by the right hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c770-1
House
House of Commons

You're going to buy a house there, aren't you?

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c768
House
House of Commons

Let me first declare my interest as one who is still a member of a local authority. Is the right hon. Gentleman, like me, aware that some authorities have expressed the fear that they will have to make cuts in this year's expenditure to prepare the ground for the implementation...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c718
House
House of Commons

The information from the LGA is very helpful, but it is an average. In some areas, the cut will be far worse than £6 a week because the number of pensioners and others who are protected will be greater. In some local authority areas in my constituency, people could lose...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c722
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely with the point made by the right hon. Member for Wentworth and Dearne (John Healey). The real problem is that local authorities that cut their reserves will be penalised by their district auditor, who will say that cutting reserves below a certain level is not stable local...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c728
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely. Some hon. Members like me, have close-knit communities that are right next to communities in other local authorities. People on one side of the road will have a different scheme from those on the other side. It will be horrendously difficult to explain why one scheme prevails...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c738
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State will be making a grave error of judgment if he thinks he is going to get away with that in Portsmouth, because I will be telling people there loud and clear where the responsibility for the change lies. Above all, I am disappointed that a Secretary...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c737-8
House
House of Commons

May I say how nice it is to see you in the Chair, Mr Crausby? I wish to raise my concern about the fact that we are approaching 7 o'clock and will hardly get halfway down the selection list. The time available is totally inadequate. Goodness knows what the Government...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c736-7
House
House of Commons

I do not agree with the benefits being devolved to local authorities, so what does the hon. Gentleman, who is arguing against localising the benefits under discussion, see as the real benefit of doing so?

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2012
Reference
539 c733
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on Archway tower and Millennium tower at Portsmouth. - Disallowed by Speaker.
Asked by
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Public Accounts Commission
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1999
Reference
335 c786
House
House of Commons