Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for subject:Defence

Member X
Mike Hancock
Subject X
Armed forces

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hancock, Mike (43)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Armed forces (43)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much and what proportion of the defence budget was allocated to service pay in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2011
Reference
79114; 535 c232W
House
House of Commons

As the Secretary of State did not say too much about the Royal Navy, can we take it that the bases in Portsmouth, Plymouth and Rosyth are safe from any cuts? Can he give an assurance that the Navy basing, based on the plan announced earlier this year, will be...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2011
Reference
531 c654
House
House of Commons

May I say what a pleasure it is to see you, Hugh Bayley, sitting in the Chair as Deputy Speaker? My only regret is that you will not be one of the candidates who will occupy it on a long-term basis; that is the House's loss. I point out to...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c228-30
House
House of Commons

It is, and the European Parliament would grasp the opportunity willingly, but we have to have a proper way of ensuring that there is national parliamentary scrutiny of what is happening in Europe when it comes to defence and security. If we do not, we will be badly letting down...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c230-1
House
House of Commons

I am interested in the right hon. Lady's comments on the Kurds. If everything is so good now in Kurdistan, why do so many of the Kurds who have settled in Britain totally refuse even to consider going back?

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c202
House
House of Commons

That this House regrets the Ministry of Defence's decision to close RAF Cottesmore, home to the Harrier Force as part of changes to the defence programme announced in December 2009; notes the decision pre-empts the Government's prior pledge to consider the capabilities and configuration of the armed forces as part...

Primary sponsor
Alan Duncan (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
5 January 2010
Reference
534
House
House of Commons

When will the Secretary of State be in a position to make a statement to the House about the future of HMS Endurance? Is he aware of the debilitating effect that the continuous drift of the carrier programme is having on the work force in Portsmouth dockyard? They were led...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2009
Reference
502 c814
House
House of Commons

First, on behalf of myself and my colleagues, I would like to give my condolences to the families of the three paratroopers. As hon. Members have said and as I am sure the Minister will repeat, all of our thoughts and prayers go to the families and friends of the...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c35WH
House
House of Commons

No. He knows, as well as I do, that the Defence Committee has never shirked from its responsibility of taking on the military in relation to equipment. We do not have in-service dates now because the MOD learned through Eurofighter, which had more in–service dates than Frank Sinatra had retirement...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c35-6WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister shakes his head. The hon. Member for North Durham who spoke earlier said that there has been a change. That change has been a long time coming. In the past, predecessors of the Minister have repeatedly spoken to the Committee and the House and have flatly refused to...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c36WH
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will agree with me about this. When looking at FRES, the Defence Committee learned that the military could not make up their minds about their requirements. They continuously changed their minds, and pressure was created because nobody had a clear indication of what...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c28WH
House
House of Commons

They do not.

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c29WH
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Minister's intervention. Of course, he cannot take responsibility for the past, but he shook his head too quickly because I was going to give the Government credit for the changes. Perhaps that is part of the problem.

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c36WH
House
House of Commons

And the gun was nearly rejected. In the end, it had been dismantled and put it together so many times it seemed the Government were trying to find fault with it. Because it had been used in operation we knew that it was the weapon required, yet every obstacle possible...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2008
Reference
477 c36-7WH
House
House of Commons

Like the right hon. Gentleman, I hope that the lessons from Deepcut and in respect of the duty of care have been learned, but one of the issues that was raised time and again was the way in which potential recruits were judged before they joined the forces. Is the...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1056
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I wish that some of the Members who spoke earlier had borne that advice in mind, particularly as those of us waiting to speak have been here since the beginning of the debate. Some of them had not been in the Chamber for very long...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1119-22
House
House of Commons

Yes.

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1112
House
House of Commons

I went there with you!

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1112
House
House of Commons

It was on the training of the trainers.

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1056
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is a bizarre contradiction of what we are trying to do with married quarters for Annington Homes to sell off homes that they bought on the cheap from the MOD while, not half a mile away, the MOD is building at great expense...

Member
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
459 c1083
House
House of Commons