Skip to main content

1-20 of 749 results for answeredby:"Department for Transport"

Member X
Lord Hammond of Runnymede

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hammond of Runnymede, Lord (749)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We have obviously seen the Select Committee’s report, and, as the hon. Gentleman will know, we are considering our response carefully. We will respond by 28 August, and we will certainly read and respond to the section about the impact on the lives of the survivors. As for the question of a full public inquiry, the CAA has conducted a thorough review and has made important recommendations. We need to give

the organisations involved time to implement those recommendations, and we are making sure that they address the concerns of the industry.

Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c430
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his policy is on a direct link to Heathrow airport as part of the proposed High Speed 2 scheme.

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2011
Reference
71778; 532 c1387-8W
House
House of Commons
Since I last answered Transport questions, the consultation on high-speed rail has closed. The Department has announced £155 million of investment from the first-round allocation of the local sustainable transport fund, concluded deals to put new carriages on key commuter rail routes, set out the next stages in the Department's rail franchising programme and launched a consultation on proposals for new lane rental schemes to cut the number of rush-hour roadworks.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1171
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend raises a very topical point. She may know that in August we had one of the longest ever post-accident closures on the M25 very close to my own constituency, as it happens, when the motorway was closed for more than 24 hours following an accident. The Under-Secretary of State for Transport, the hon. Member for Hemel Hempstead (Mike Penning), has been in discussion with the Association of Chief Police Officers, the police lead on traffic services. A working group is now operating between the Highways Agency and ACPO, which will be reporting before the end of the year. We have also allocated £3 million to invest in the latest laser scanners to allow the police to record traffic accident scenes more quickly and allow the clear-up of the motorway to progress more quickly.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1171-2
House
House of Commons
I am happy to consider any representation that my hon. Friend wants to make, but our primary objective is to ensure that funds are available for an additional crossing in the future, and our approach to Dartford is to ensure that that can be affordably delivered.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1172
House
House of Commons
My understanding is that TUPE will apply in such circumstances. For the record, Siemens employs 16,000 people in this country, many—indeed, I think most—are represented by the Unite union, and my understanding from the inquiries that I have made is that relationships between the union that represents them and the company are extremely good.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1173
House
House of Commons
Ah, the sting in the tail! My hon. Friend makes a very good point and I understand the concern that some Members representing seats in the north-west, Yorkshire and places further north have about the fact that we have to progress this project in two separate stages through two separate hybrid Bills. I have made it clear on every occasion I possibly can that the Government are committed to the whole Y network project. The benefit-to-cost ratio is based on the whole Y network, and I will do whatever I can to build into the first hybrid Bill reassurance to people and businesses in Manchester, Yorkshire and the Humber, and the north east that we will indeed complete the full Y project.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1173
House
House of Commons
I understand the right hon. Gentleman's point, and I agree that there will be a need for assisted channels— ... I will tell the right hon. Gentleman what assisted channels are. Even as the purchase of tickets, over time, is bound to become more computer based, as new technologies are deployed and more tickets are bought online, through mobile technology and so on, there will still be a need for an assisted channel, and we will ensure that there is one.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1162
House
House of Commons
The hon. Lady is all over the place. There is nothing to scrap in relation to the Crossrail rolling stock procurement programme, because we have not started that procurement yet. We announced that we will postpone the issue of the invitation to tender until the new year, in order that consideration be given to the findings of the growth review and how public procurement in this country can best support the strategic interests of the supply chain. The broader Crossrail project, involving a major infrastructure investment—the tunnels across London—is, as the hon. Lady and anyone who travels around London knows, already under way as is manifest in the large number of big holes in the ground.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1161
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to the hon. Lady for her question. We are sensitive to the pressures that the UK train manufacturing supply chain—not just Bombardier but the component suppliers—are under, and the Department is urgently looking at some other projects that might be advanced. In particular, the industry proposed a project to modify the cross-country Voyager train fleet so that it could run under electric power, which would provide—if Bombardier were to win the contract—a substantial piece of work for the crucial design department in Derby. That is at the heart of securing the future of that business.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1160-1
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman says ““we””. I am not sure who the ““we”” is. We have decided that we will have to increase rail fares by 3% in real terms for the next three years in order to protect the major programme of investment in the rolling stock, electrification and new infrastructure that the country needs. It is a tough decision, but it is the right decision.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1162
House
House of Commons
I sometimes get the feeling that I am talking to a brick wall on this subject. I have said it before and I will say it again: the criteria by which the bids were to be evaluated were laid down by the Government in 2008. The criteria have to be followed, although they might not be the criteria the hon. Gentleman would like. We have made a commitment to look at the way we specify the criteria in future public procurements, but on this project it is Labour's mess and we are landed with it.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1159
House
House of Commons
Since privatisation, Bombardier, as the only current UK-based train manufacturer, has supplied the majority of new trains across the UK main line rail and London underground networks, with a combined total of over 4,500 new carriages ordered since 1996. Going forward, there are a number of contracts that the Department would expect Bombardier to bid for, including the Crossrail project for the supply of around 600 carriages, and it is already a pre-qualified bidder. The tender for this contract is due to be issued in 2012. There are also potential future orders for the London Underground deep tube lines.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1159
House
House of Commons
As stated at the Select Committee on Transport on 7 September, for all future Government-led procurements—not just those for rolling stock—the Prime Minister has asked the growth review to examine the degree to which the Government can set out the requirements and the evaluation criteria with a sharper focus on the UK's strategic interest, including a review of public procurement practice and outcomes in other EU member states and a review of current private sector best practice. The results of those reviews will inform future Government-led procurements.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1170
House
House of Commons
Economic cases for large projects are periodically refreshed—for example, to reflect the latest economic forecasts. A robust economic case for HS2 was prepared for the recent consultation, with a benefit-cost ratio of 1:2.6. An update will be published later this year. The latest update of the Crossrail economic case was published in July 2011, with a BCR of 1:1.97. I should make it clear that the economic case is only one of the criteria used in decision making for transport infrastructure projects.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1169
House
House of Commons
Since privatisation, Bombardier, as the only current UK-based train manufacturer, has supplied the majority of new trains across the UK main line rail and London underground networks, with a combined total of over 4,500 new carriages ordered since 1996. Going forward, there are a number of contracts that the Department would expect Bombardier to bid for, including the Crossrail project for the supply of around 600 carriages, and it is already a pre-qualified bidder. The tender for this contract is due to be issued in 2012. There are also potential future orders for the London Underground deep tube lines.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1159
House
House of Commons
Annual statistics for the year ending March 2011 published by the Office of Rail Regulation show that passenger travel rose during the year to reach an overall, all-time high of 33.6 billion passenger miles. The number of rail journeys has been rising steadily each year since privatisation with only one slight drop in the total during 2009. Since then the upward trend has resumed to reach a total of 1.4 billion journeys undertaken. Long-distance rail travel has nearly doubled since privatisation.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1161-2
House
House of Commons
I should emphasise to my hon. Friend that the review is not concerned simply with train procurement but is a review of public sector procurement across the board. It will look at what is happening elsewhere and whether there are things that we can do differently so that procurements initiated by this Government do not have the flaws that hon. Members are identifying in the Thameslink procurement initiated by the last Government.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1170
House
House of Commons
Management of stations is the responsibility of train operators. Under the revised franchise programme that the Minister of State has announced, we intend to transfer leasehold ownership of stations to the franchise train operator, so that it can have a more direct, hands-on involvement. However, I will look into the specific example about which my hon. Friend asks.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1162
House
House of Commons
The Prime Minister has agreed that the growth review should include a review of public procurement in the UK, and that work is now under way. We will look at what happens in other EU countries that are similarly constrained by EU procurement rules, and we will look at best procurement practice in large commercial companies to maintain long-term best value. We will certainly look at the opportunities provided by, and the appropriateness of, including socio-economic criteria, where appropriate.
Answered by
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c1160
House
House of Commons