Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Surveillance

Member X
Lord Garnier

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Garnier, Lord (22)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, for her introductory remarks about her Bill. Unquestionably, the conduct of undercover agents of the state—be they police officers or members of the secret services—is a matter of great public interest. For women who have had relations with men who they...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2026
Reference
858 cc796-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene briefly because the noble Lords, Lord Anderson and Lord Clement-Jones, have set out with great clarity the thinking behind their two amendments, and I am very convinced by them. I am convinced by them particularly because this applies to without-suspicion seizure, which is, from my point...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
851 c1928
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to speak briefly to the amendment that my noble friend Lord Attlee spent about 15 seconds talking about; that is, his Amendment 414. At the outset of his remarks, I was worried that he might be positively going to support his own amendment, but he very...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
851 c1948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble and learned friend Lord Stewart has made both his first appearance at the Dispatch Box and his maiden speech.

He spoke kindly and accurately of our noble and learned friend Lord Keen and modestly of himself, but we have already benefited from his being here with...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2020
Reference
807 cc1068-1070
House
House of Lords

May I, as others have done, warmly congratulate the Prime Minister and his Defence Ministers since 2010 on turning round the economy of the Ministry of Defence and its procurement regime, and thank him for committing to the 2% NATO expenditure target? Beyond that, I urge him to consider finding...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2015
Reference
602 c1071
House
House of Commons

To ask the Attorney-General pursuant to the answer of 9 July 2012, Official Report, column 12W, on police: surveillance, if at his next discussion with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), he will ask the DPP to provide an estimate of the number of cases where there may have been...

Asked by
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Answering body
Attorney-General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2012
Reference
117437; 548 c464W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Attorney-General what recent discussions he has had with the Director of Public Prosecutions on the number of cases where there may have been a miscarriage of justice due to the involvement of undercover police officers; what estimate he has made of the number of such cases; and...

Asked by
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Answering body
Attorney-General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2012
Reference
115830; 548 c12W
House
House of Commons

On 18 April 2011, Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions, announced that following a review by Clare Montgomery QC, the safety of the convictions of the individuals who protested at Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station, should be considered by the Court of Appeal as soon as possible. During that review,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Department
Attorney General
Type
Written statements
Date
13 July 2011
Reference
531 c21WS
House
House of Commons

That was a compromise arrived at and brokered by the hon. Member for Walsall, North (Mr. Winnick). Were it not for his amendment, I think that we would be hovering somewhere above 50 days and trying to get some reduction from the 90 days that the then Government were trying...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c312-3
House
House of Commons

The Bill states, at the top of page 54:"““The Secretary of State may certify in relation to an inquest””" and so on. Does he carry on the certification process privately, or is it susceptible to counter-argument, and is his decision to certify justiciable? [Interruption.] Can I take him to court...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c270
House
House of Commons

They should already have been worked through. That is the whole point about the drafting of the Bill. I do not wish to be unduly aggressive, but the Minister ought to able to answer my questions—if not right now, then having taken advice on them.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c270
House
House of Commons

I am extremely grateful. It is reassuring that some part of the House of Commons will have the opportunity to discuss the draft Bill in a relatively calm and consensual environment. Of course there will be individual disagreements, but I have a suspicion that the Committee as a whole will...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c311
House
House of Commons

And so they should be, but I have no doubt that the right hon. Gentleman and his colleagues on the Committee—Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat—will come forward with a considered view on the matter and produce a report that will be not only worth his producing but worth our debating....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c312
House
House of Commons

Although I frequently agree with the right hon. Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz), who is also my neighbour, the matters that we are dealing with today do not represent closure. By the very nature of the Government and the Home Secretary's production of the draft counter-terrorism temporary provisions Bill,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c310-1
House
House of Commons

The interchange between my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Mr. Hogg) and the hon. Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) has been more illuminating than is often the case in debates of this sort. My right hon. and learned Friend has analysed...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c286-8
House
House of Commons

We do not have to use a hypothetical example, as we know from friendly fire incidents in Iraq that the US was extremely reluctant to allow evidence about what its forces were doing to be used in the inquests into the deaths of our service men and women. We already...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c291
House
House of Commons

I am making a suggestion; I have no power over those who work behind the Chair. However, I dare say that somebody with a bit of initiative, such as the Minister, could find out the answer. The point is that there will come a time when deaths in custody, involving...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c288-9
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend says that it might be seven years. The Minister will have that information available to him—

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
483 c288
House
House of Commons

Yes, the hon. Gentleman was. There is plenty of evidence that that governmental habit has been repeated decade after decade, so let me take my hat off to the Government—they win no prizes for originality, but they certainly win prizes for lifting up the pot plants to see what the...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2006
Reference
443 c683
House
House of Commons

I want to begin with an apology. Like a number of Members who have spoken in today’s debate, I was not here at the outset to hear the Home Secretary introduce Second Reading. My excuse is that I was obeying the law. Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003—or, at least,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2006
Reference
443 c679-83
House
House of Commons