Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Member X
Baroness Garden of Frognal

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is very late and I will be very brief, but I want to associate these Benches with all that the noble Baroness, Lady Wolf, has raised. Apprenticeships should be for those starting out in working life. A level 7 apprenticeship is surely a contradiction in terms, but...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 July 2025
Reference
848 cc369-370
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to this amendment, which was tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Wolf, but has been very ably spoken to by the noble Lord, Lord Aberdare. He and I tend to find ourselves in the same Lobbies for just about everything to do with apprenticeships.

We...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2025
Reference
846 cc299-300
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to reach a negotiated settlement with trade unions representing the teaching profession in the ongoing industrial dispute over teacher pay and conditions.

Asked by
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 2023
Reference
HL4489
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how the Ministry of Defence is ensuring that its non-confinement policy is (1) not discriminatory to its workforce, and (2) ensures the greatest available pool of talent is available to serve in demanding roles overseas.

Asked by
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 2022
Reference
HL2964
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what are the reasons for the differences between the non-confinement policies operated by the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, specifically in Kenya; and why the Ministry of Defence is more restrictive.

Asked by
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 2022
Reference
HL2963
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hill of Oareford on 4 December (WA 142–3), whether the Agency Workers Regulations apply in the Channel Islands; and whether they are satisfied that employers based in the Channel Islands of teachers working in the United Kingdom are...

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2013
Reference
742 c109WA; HL4059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 11 in the name of the Minister and also flag up that we have complementary amendments coming up in the same group as Amendment 22. We have had a query from TreeHouse, which deals with autistic children, asking for assurances on the funding for non-maintained...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c252
House
House of Lords

22: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— "Monitoring provision in Academies for children with special educational needs (1) The Secretary of State shall, in respect of each academic year, prepare a report and lay it before Parliament on the quality of educational provision made for children with special...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c289-90
House
House of Lords

I move Amendment 22 and speak to Amendments 45 and 46, also in this group, which are in my name and those of my noble friends Lady Walmsley and Lady Sharp. The amendments complement those that we were discussing earlier under the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Hill—Amendment 11....

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c290-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken on a variety of topics in this short debate. I also welcome the Minister’s reassurances about monitoring the quality of provision for SEN. I will read in more detail in Hansard his reply to the amendments. Meanwhile, I thank the...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2010
Reference
720 c297-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for introducing and explaining the regulations. I have just a few questions. During the passage of the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill, we debated at length the statutory rights of employees to request time to undertake business-relevant study or training. As...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1655-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response, which I am afraid was as disappointing as I thought it might be after the previous discussions. We do not accept that employers would hide behind this as an excuse for not acknowledging training needs. I hear what he says, but,...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c48
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Ministers and the Bill team for all the discussions that we have had on these various clauses. Although the Bill does not address careers education in great detail, as the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, has set out, we welcome the fact that Amendment...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c45
House
House of Lords

27: Clause 40, page 20, line 37, at end insert— "( ) a documented discussion of training needs resulting in a decision on whether to extend such provision to the applicant took place within the previous 12 months"

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 27, in my name and that of my noble friend Baroness Sharp, and proposed by the Institute of Directors, has been previously debated, but we feel that it is worth bringing it up again. In addition to the listed permissible grounds to refuse study or training, the...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c46-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are grateful to the Minister and to the Bill team for the detailed discussion that we have had on these clauses. I take the point made by the noble Lords, Lord Ramsbotham and Lord Baker, that sometimes the length of the detail and description has been somewhat...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c72
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee we raised a number of concerns about transport policy that had been identified by the Association of Colleges. We fully support what the noble Lord, Lord Low, has just said; we are delighted that the Government have accepted the suggested amendment to ensure that students with...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c84
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to enable members of the Army who were recruited under the age of 18 on or before 1 January 2008 to convert their minimum term of service to four years from the first day of duty.

Asked by
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
5091; 712 c268WA
House
House of Lords