Skip to main content

1-20 of 256 results for subject:USA

Member X
Liam Fox

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Fox, Liam (256)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Afghanistan today is a tragedy backlit by defeat—even the name of Operation Enduring Freedom has already exuded a sense of irony—but lest we rewrite history, let us remember why we went. We did not go to Afghanistan out of a sense of philanthropy towards the Afghan people; we went out...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 August 2021
Reference
699 cc1310-1
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement. Having been in Afghanistan many times, I add my very sincere tribute to our armed forces, the civilian support, the non-governmental organisations and all those who risked, and sometimes sacrificed, life and limb to give the people of Afghanistan a better...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2021
Reference
698 c1112
House
House of Commons
Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2020
Reference
676 cc617-9
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my right hon. Friend on her statement. Will she confirm not only that UK exports to the United States currently attract half a billion pounds-worth of tariffs, the removal of which will be an immediate boost to the UK economy, but that the opportunities are even greater? We...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
672 c648
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with my right hon. Friend; General Soleimani carried out Iran’s proxy wars, from the horrors in Yemen to the support for the bloody Assad regime. He was a key ally of Hezbollah and its terror networks. He did all of these things as a central figure in...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2020
Reference
669 c262
House
House of Commons

Last summer, we launched four 14-week long public consultations providing citizens and businesses across the UK and overseas with the opportunity to give their views on potential future Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the United States, Australia, New Zealand and on the UK potentially seeking accession to the Comprehensive...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Written statements
Date
18 July 2019
Reference
HCWS1735
House
House of Commons

What recent discussions he has had with his counterpart in the US Administration on trade and investment between the UK and the US; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Michael Fabricant (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 2019
Reference
911901; 663 cc429-430
House
House of Commons

Over the past three years, the DIT has laid the groundwork for an ambitious free trade agreement with the US once we have left the EU, including through the UK-US trade and investment working group, which met for the sixth time in London yesterday. This week, I have been in Washington to discuss the progress of these preparations with my American counterparts and make sure we are ready to grasp this golden opportunity once we have left the EU.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 July 2019
Reference
663 c429
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is correct. The UK and the US have a deep long-standing relationship with a strong and enduring bond. We have a shared heritage, legal system and language, and we co-operate extensively in security, prosperity and defence, and at many levels of our society, culture and economy, our co-operation is closer than that of any other two countries—something that my hon. Friend contributed to in his time as shadow Trade Minister.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 July 2019
Reference
663 c430
House
House of Commons

When it comes to the manufacturing element, we take it very seriously. Our goods exports have actually exceeded the growth in our service exports in recent times, which is testament to the way in which the manufacturing sector has been encouraged and grown under this Government, in stark contrast to what happened under the previous Labour Government, when it shrank substantially.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 July 2019
Reference
663 c430
House
House of Commons

I deeply regret the resignation of Sir Kim Darroch, whom I was with actually in the time before his resignation. He was a great, dedicated and professional public servant. I hugely decry the leak that led to that resignation. The leak was unprofessional, unethical and unpatriotic, and I hope that, if we are able to discover the culprit, we will throw the book at them.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 July 2019
Reference
663 c430
House
House of Commons

I agree that there are issues around the whole concept of extra-territorial rules on trade, which is why of course it is fundamental that we get a strengthening of the rules-based system at the WTO in Geneva. That will help us deal with some of those issues, but where the United Kingdom believes we have a unique role to play—for example in upholding the joint comprehensive plan of action—we will continue to do so, and we will resist any attempts to force UK trading entities to behave in a way that we do not believe is legal.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 June 2019
Reference
661 c254
House
House of Commons

Of course post-EU it will be the Government and this Parliament that will determine what trade arrangements we have, not the European Union. I understand the hon. Gentleman’s passionate defence of the NHS: I trained and worked in the NHS as a doctor. Under this Government the NHS will not be for sale, and I would hope that is something we can agree across the House.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 June 2019
Reference
661 c254
House
House of Commons

Obviously not.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
658 c865
House
House of Commons

The Trade Bill was and is about trade continuity, including trade agreements and including the Trade Remedies Authority. It has been used, I am afraid, in the other place to hold debates on future trade agreements that will come in due course here. There is of course a difference between setting out negotiating objectives, which the United States did, and a mandate, which is how the negotiators actually go about it. It seems that the hon. Gentleman has not grasped that point yet.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2019
Reference
656 c509
House
House of Commons

This is an issue that the Government take seriously because we want to ensure that British companies have the right to trade where we think it is appropriate and where the British Government’s foreign policy indicates that. I have had and will continue to have discussions with my American counterparts on that issue.

Answered by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2019
Reference
656 c511
House
House of Commons

Motion this House has considered potential future free trade agreements: Australia, New Zealand, US and a comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Liam Fox
Answering member
Barry Gardiner; Graham Stuart; Bill Esterson
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Debates
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1618-1690
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered potential future free trade agreements: Australia, New Zealand, US and a comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.

It is a pleasure to open the debate on Britain’s potential future free trade agreements as an independent trading nation outside the European Union. The...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1619
House
House of Commons

I have read a number of representations from a number of organisations, particularly in relation to investor-state dispute settlements on matters such as healthcare, but let me say first that the ISDS system does not and cannot force the privatisation of any public services, and under current UK and EU...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1619-1620
House
House of Commons

While I clearly reject the latter part of what the right hon. Gentleman has said, the rest of it is very important. Trade agreements make it very clear that it is up to the elected Government of the United Kingdom to determine what they do with public services. The matter...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1620
House
House of Commons