Skip to main content

1-20 of 61 results for subject:"Voting behaviour"

Member X
Lord Falconer of Thoroton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Falconer of Thoroton, Lord (61)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

And I withdraw the word ““unimpressive”” and apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson. There are two issues for your Lordships to consider. First, are your Lordships satisfied that the issue is important enough to be referred back? Secondly, has it been considered properly by the other place? On the...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c783-4
House
House of Lords

This is also an important debate and, again, the question is whether or not we should ask the other place to think again. We on this side of the House think it is right that we should do so. Again, there is an interaction of two issues: first, the extent...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c688-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Isle of Wight on this great achievement and the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, on the work that he has done to secure it. I wish the people of the Isle of Wight well in relation to the conclusion that has been reached. It is a...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is for your Lordships to imagine what happened to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbots, between approximately 1 pm this afternoon and that rather unimpressive speech.

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c783
House
House of Lords

I am not taking interventions. Thirteen per cent of the electorate could pass a change in our voting system that would not be passed in the other place. Is that an appropriate basis on which to make a fundamental change? Is there a country in Europe or a developed democracy...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c784
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had an absolutely scintillating debate on this issue. The issue for the House today is whether we should ask the other place to think again. I believe that that is an interaction of two issues: first, the extent to which we think it has been given...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
725 c671-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support the amendment and we supported it previously. The noble Lord invited our appreciation of the amendment. I expressly appreciate the amendment for its drafting and also its mover who has spent a lifetime supporting participation of this sort. He thoroughly deserves to get his amendment.

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c524
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an important point. I completely agree with my noble friend Lord Rooker on the meaning of his amendment. I completely support him when he says that this is not a fatal threshold, by which I mean that if more than 40 per cent of those entitled...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c518-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for noble Lords who are interested in this amendment, perhaps I may start again. The first amendment on today’s Marshalled List deals with expenditure on the campaigns in support of or against the alternative vote system. My amendment to Clause 5, and that of my noble friend Lord...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c507-9
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 5, page 4, line 48, at end insert— ““( ) Party election broadcasts during the referendum period will not be broadcast if they deal with pictures or implied support of any particular side in the referendum on the voting system for parliamentary elections.””

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c507
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today's date was fixed without consultation. Had we been consulted, we would have said that there was no reason not to comply with the usual interval of three working days between Report and Third Reading, meaning that Third Reading would have taken place tomorrow. I raise the point...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c507
House
House of Lords

I accept the noble Lord’s implied, or indeed express, criticism. My wording is not good and that is my fault. It would have been much better if the amendment had said: ““Party election broadcasts during the referendum period will not be broadcast if they support any particular side in the...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c509
House
House of Lords

I apologise: at Third Reading today. It is an important issue, and I wait with interest to hear what the Government have to say. In the course of my telephone conversation with the Minister last Friday, one of his officials, plainly reflecting policy, said that either the Electoral Commission or...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c509
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord for his speech, but there is a fundamental problem with it; he referred to flexibility, but the amendment seeks to establish the principle that in a party political broadcast you should not be able to support an outcome in the AV...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c511-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Clerk, brutally, is shaking his head. I would be willing to adopt the noble and learned Lord’s approach to this matter. However, if the House adopts the approach that I am taking, I anticipate that the Government will either reject the amendment in the other place, or,...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2011
Reference
725 c512
House
House of Lords

She has got two ears. I agree with that. I will go on. I am sure that the fact that she has two ears has some significance to the story. There are 12 offences identified in paragraph 8. The purpose of the offences, as I understand it—though I stand to...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
723 c652
House
House of Lords

I was not sure when the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, and the Minister envisaged that we should have this debate. If they could identify on which particular issues we should have it, that would be fine. My question—

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
723 c653
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish this was as simple as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, said. The difficulties in this area spring from the inappropriateness of parts of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 and its rules on expenditure as applied to this particular circumstance....

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
723 c631-2
House
House of Lords

39AC: Clause 6, page 4, line 3, after ““15A”” insert ““and as if the Schedule set out in Schedule (Limits on referendum expenses by permitted participants) to this Act were inserted into that Act as Schedule 14A.””

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
723 c631
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I indicated in my remarks on the first group of amendments that I proposed to Clause 5 that the clause was introduced to deal with the problems identified by the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee in the other place. In principle, we think that it is a good...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
723 c625
House
House of Lords