Skip to main content

1-20 of 44 results for subject:Finance

Member X
John Denham
Subject X
Education

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Education (44)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Today I am announcing the successful proposals for England to receive a share of the migration impacts fund. The fund provides £35 million across the UK for 2009-10 financed by a levy on migrants and, subject to a review in the autumn, a similar amount in 2010-11. This money will...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
9 July 2009
Reference
495 c50-1WS
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to reply to the debate. I apologise to my hon. Friends and to Opposition Members if I cannot respond to all their comments in detail. A wide range of issues has been raised. My hon. Friend the Member for Blackpool, South (Mr. Marsden) emphasised the needs...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c119-20
House
House of Commons

Whatever is the case, the Opposition are in some confusion on this issue. The hon. Member for Surrey Heath said he had inadvertently deleted a letter from my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families asking about the schools budget, so let me remind the...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c121
House
House of Commons

What the hon. Gentleman needs to understand is that what matters—this is very important—is the number of people who successfully qualify in an apprenticeship. When the hon. Gentleman's party was in power about a quarter of people—if that—ever completed an apprenticeship. The completion rate is now up to two thirds....

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c122-3
House
House of Commons

This is an important measure and it will take forward the skills agenda—[Laughter.] It will take it forward in a way that the Opposition have never done. When they were in power, there was no investment in apprenticeships, and none in the FE capital programme. I heard the concerns expressed...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c123
House
House of Commons

I have resisted intervening on a number of tendentious facts and claims uttered by the hon. Gentleman in the past half hour, but will he withdraw his claim that there has been a moratorium on construction, and will he confirm that the full £2.3 billion of further education capital budget...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c48
House
House of Commons

Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings in Committee, on Report, Third Reading and any other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question. Ways and Means resolution agreed to on question.

Lead member
Ed Balls
Answering member
Lord Gove
Department
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c23-124
House
House of Commons

As I understand it, the two projects to which my hon. Friend refers have received full approval in detail. None of the colleges that have received such approval is affected by the current delay in LSC consideration.

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c719
House
House of Commons

We have established a clearing house in the construction sector to try to match apprentices who may lose their jobs with other placements. We have also changed some of the rules in the system to make it easier for apprentices to continue their college-based training to get the necessary technical...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c722
House
House of Commons

As I understand it, no college plan has been presented to the LSC in the hon. Gentleman's constituency for approval, even in principle. It may well be that his local college has aspirations and hopes to move forward, as many others do and rightly should, but it does not do...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c718
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that that is true. If we move to cut hundreds of millions of pounds from a budget in just a couple of months' time, large areas of spending will not be possible. For that sort of cut, we could shut six universities—but of course we could not...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c717
House
House of Commons

I shall make a little progress and then come back to my hon. Friend. We believe that, in addition to support for investment in skills and training, there should be an increase in support for those who lose their jobs. The Conservative party opposed the measures needed to pay for...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c717
House
House of Commons

As the Conservative party has made clear, the whole £1 billion in the Train to Gain budget for 2010-11 would not be spent on those activities. I shall come back to that issue later. The whole package of support for small businesses, and now for larger companies, and for the...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c717
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Gentleman, yes.

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c718
House
House of Commons

I might choose more temperate and moderate language. However, it is reasonable to assume that many Conservative Members seeking to intervene will, like the hon. Member for Havant, want to suggest that more money should be spent. Conservative Members need to understand that they come from a party whose leader...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c716
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right on both points. It is indicative that the hon. Member for Havant was unable to recognise one of the biggest success stories of recent years—that by providing modest financial support for people at work to encourage their friends to get involved in learning, we have...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c716
House
House of Commons

Skills and further education. Fourth Opposition Day debate (part 1). Motion negatived on division (308 votes to 218). Amendment agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Willetts
Answering member
John Denham
Department
Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills
Type
Opposition days
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c705-64
House
House of Commons

I suggest that the hon. Gentleman go back and look at the statistics about 10 years ago, and he will see that on every one of the measures that he quoted, there has been a dramatic improvement under this Government as a result of the investment that we have made....

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c715
House
House of Commons

Indeed, I shall do that in a moment. However, will the hon. Gentleman help us? The leader of his party announced billions of pounds of spending cuts for the next financial year. He protected some areas of spending but not this Department. That is where the £610 million of cuts...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c710
House
House of Commons

Let me get a little further, if I may, in setting out the position. As part of the boost to the economy, which the Conservative party has opposed, we have brought forward £220 million over the spending review period to this year and the next. Let us be clear: it...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
487 c718
House
House of Commons