Skip to main content

1-20 of 175 results for subject:USA

Member X
David Davis

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davis, David (175)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I press the Minister on his lack of answer to my right hon. Friend the Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Sir John Hayes). When it became apparent that Mandelson posed an obvious and serious security risk to the state, it was said that ongoing mitigations were put in...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
786 c408
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, given that this applies directly to the Minster, I draw the House’s attention to the motion tabled by the now Prime Minister on 4 December 2018 following non-compliance with a previous Humble Address. It starts:

“That this House finds Ministers in contempt for their failure to...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Points of order
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
786 cc412-3
House
House of Commons

Sometimes the wisdom of the House is crystallised in the comments of us ordinary Back Benchers. That was particularly evident today in the brave speech of the hon. Member for South Shields (Emma Lewell) and, indeed, the intervention of the hon. Member for Birmingham Perry Barr (Ayoub Khan) on the...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc759-760
House
House of Commons

That is entirely true, and in fact, the current Trump Administration made the same point to the Government before the nomination of Peter Mandelson.

That perverse logic led to the most obviously unwise public appointment in modern times, and the implied message, unfortunately, was clear: “Government appointments rest on networks of...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c760
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is exactly right. Indeed, it is worse than that, because this post is the nexus of the entire Five Eyes intelligence co-operation. Our service is not like that of the Americans. In the American embassy, the CIA is freestanding; the ambassador does not matter. In our...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 cc761-3
House
House of Commons

In a debate about misleading the House, it makes me wonder when Members of this House accuse others of not voting on a motion that did not lead to a vote, so I will not take an intervention. I will certainly not take an intervention from the hon. Gentleman. He...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
784 c763
House
House of Commons

Our ambassador in Washington stands at the nexus of the Five Eyes, with more classified intelligence crossing his desk than crosses the desks of most Cabinet Ministers. It is obviously one of the most important appointments the Prime Minister makes, but it is also one of the most sensitive. A...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc201-2
House
House of Commons

That is the public information. If the hon. Gentleman wants to get into the argument between UKVS, which we are now told was saying the risk was marginal, and No. 10, who are saying that the strike-off is a red, he can do that. I am talking about public data,...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c202
House
House of Commons

No, no, the hon. Gentleman has had his go. Sit down.

No. 10 has chosen to ignore these things, and that is critical. We have heard about the pressure that was being put on the Foreign Office over and over again. Forgive me again, Mr Speaker, for this direct quote, because...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c202
House
House of Commons

I came in to watch the Committee. Sir Olly actually said that the advice he was given by his director of intelligence was “borderline”. One issue that was not clear was whether the pressure from No. 10 was simply on him or on all members of the channel, down to...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 c206
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister rebuffed first the Leader of the Opposition and then the leader of the Liberal Democrats for saying that the then Cabinet Secretary’s advice to the Prime Minister was to get the clearance before the announcement. I will read one sentence from a document entitled “Options for HMA...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 cc34-5
House
House of Commons

Last week, the Government withheld the questions the Prime Minister put to Peter Mandelson and his responses, apparently at the request of the Metropolitan police. This is perhaps the most important documentation we could see and, as Madam Deputy Speaker confirmed, “Erskine May” confirms that:

“In criminal matters, proceedings are active...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
782 cc652-3
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what contact her department had with counterparts in the US on the release and ongoing surveillance of Omar al Bayoumi in 2001 and 2002.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 2026
Reference
110723
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which of her Department's officials informed US authorities that they would not observe the interrogation of Omar al Bayoumi in 2001.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 2026
Reference
110722
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions her Department had with US counterparts on extraditing Omar al Bayoumi in 2001.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
110724
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which of her Department's officials informed the Metropolitan Police that the US would not be extraditing Omar al-Bayoumi in 2001.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
110721
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what information her Department holds on the work of the Metropolitan Police in September 2001 on the possible extradition of Omar al Bayoumi.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
110720
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish correspondence between Lord Mandelson and Morgan McSweeney on the former's appointment as the British Ambassador to the United States.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 October 2025
Reference
76555
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member has made a theoretical argument and a general argument, but the actual argument is that Karen Pierce was a brilliant campaigner who would never have made the mistakes made by Lord Mandelson, which he alludes to, and she should not have been replaced.

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2025
Reference
772 c1380
House
House of Commons

I am going to pause for a second. Let me say first to the Minster that I think everyone who spoke remembered the victims. After the sound of this political gunfire is long forgotten, they will still be suffering the scarring of what happened to them as a result of...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2025
Reference
772 cc1390-1
House
House of Commons