Skip to main content

1-12 of 12 results for subject:Defence

Member X
David Davis
Session X
2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davis, David (12)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Unallotted backbench debate (part one). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
David Davis
Answering member
Peter Luff
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Backbench debates
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c472-509
House
House of Commons

The Minister has answered my question.

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c483
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right on both counts. It would suit very well the people whose mind we are trying to change if we fought against ourselves on party political or geographical grounds. Much as I look back with amusement and fondness on past cricketing experiences in the...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c475
House
House of Commons

The Minister is making a very courteous and informative speech that is very helpful to us. Will he ensure that the response of the Public Accounts Committee and the National Audit Office to my request that they investigate some of the yellow book operations is taken on board in that...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c484
House
House of Commons

I think everybody takes the point that, in the modern defence market, there will be offset. Everybody has offset; we have offset. As has been made clear, offset arrangements do occur. It is problem when those offset arrangements become the permanent new manufacturing base for the aircraft, which is effectively...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c487
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c483
House
House of Commons

Frankly, I will resist making this a Labour versus Tory argument, for a simple reason. For the past 10 years, when it comes to BAE Systems and employment in our constituencies, the right hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle and I have studiously aimed solely at protecting...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c475
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House urges BAE Systems to act to preserve the UK's defence production skills base and, as a recipient of enormous resources over many years from the UK taxpayer, to deploy those resources in such a way as to protect the nation's manufacturing capability." On 27...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c472-4
House
House of Commons

There is another side to the coin, but since my hon. Friend draws me on that point, I am afraid that on one side there is a pound, and on the other there is a ha'penny. I was the Public Accounts Committee Chairman for five years, and I looked at...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c475-6
House
House of Commons

I shall give way for the last time, because many Members want to speak.

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c476
House
House of Commons

It is certainly the consequence of deliberate decisions. Whether the management intended this outcome at the beginning, or whether it is sheer crass misjudgment, I will leave the House to judge. What I am trying to do is lay out the facts as starkly as I can, because it was...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c476-7
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend, who has been very active in this campaign, brings me to the nub of the issue. It is precisely because the company had, until five years ago, experience in civil aviation; precisely because it is the biggest employer of engineers in the country; and because of its...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
536 c477
House
House of Commons