Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Biometrics

Member X
Philip Davies

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davies, Philip (35)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment she has made of the use of IRIS scanners; what estimate she has made of the total cost of this technology, including its removal; and if she will make a statement

[118141]

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 September 2012
Reference
118141; 549 c191W
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister know of any innocent person who has been negatively affected by the placing of his details on a DNA database? This is a question of balance. The Government's main aim appears to be to ensure that the DNA of someone who has not committed a crime is...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c566
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that if someone's DNA is held on a database, it does not impinge on their freedoms to go about their daily lawful business, unimpeded in anything they want to do? Does he further agree that people's freedoms are enhanced by having as many murderers,...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c564
House
House of Commons

I will have another go. Rather than asking me a question, although I am happy to debate it at a later date, I wonder whether the right hon. Gentleman will answer my question: how was this person negatively affected by having their details on the DNA database?

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

I wish to bring the right hon. Gentleman back to the case of his constituent who intervened in the fight and was put on the DNA database. How has that person's life been negatively affected by having those details on the DNA database? Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2012
Reference
542 c571
House
House of Commons

The Minister referred to the word ““may””. My new clause uses the word ““must””. There is a distinct difference between the two. Clearly, some problem arose that allowed those two people to leave the country without their identity being checked. My new clause requires that people’s identity be checked whether...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c244
House
House of Commons

As ever, my hon. Friend makes a valid point. My new clause does not specify—nor would I want it to—that people should not be allowed to wear a veil if they so wish. If they want to wear it, they should be allowed to do so, as we have enough...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c242
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that intervention. In some respects, he makes my point for me. I am sure that on some occasions that does already happen. My new clause merely insists that immigration officers ““must ensure”” that any such clothing be removed. That is clearly not...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c243
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the Minister’s indignation is unjustified. No one is saying that immigration officers do not do a good job, often under very difficult circumstances; I am merely highlighting the point that at least two people, it would appear, have fled the country in the unbelievable circumstances that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c242-3
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is entirely right. My new clause aims to help immigration officers so that they do not feel that they are being put in a difficult position, and so that no one can accuse them of some kind of political correctness or misguided racism just because they are...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c243
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c241
House
House of Commons

Until the police finally trace those people, track them down, catch them and bring them to justice, we will not know for sure whether they did. The likelihood is—certainly according to the West Yorkshire police—that the chief suspect in the Sharon Beshenivsky murder case left the country in that way....

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c242
House
House of Commons

New clause 5 would require an immigration officer to ensure that any clothing covering the face or part of it was removed to verify the identity of an individual on entering or leaving the United Kingdom. I am disappointed that I need to table the amendment, as most people would...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c241
House
House of Commons

The Minister is absolutely right, which is one of the reasons why I want Britain to regain control of its borders. To do so we need to leave the European Union, but that is a debate for another day. However, I agree with the Minister that the scale of immigration...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c247
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right and I pay tribute to all his work on the issue, highlighting the scandal of the level of immigration to this country. New clause 8 would increase the age at which someone could enter the UK through marriage from 18 to 21. The hon....

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c248
House
House of Commons

I have the advantage of not having to speak from the Front Bench. As I said earlier, I would very much like us to leave the European Union. The Minister may not know that that would save us £14 billion a year—more than enough to build secure accommodation.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c246
House
House of Commons

As ever, my right hon. Friend is right. According to a survey conducted by the TaxPayers’ Alliance, the public believe that a quarter of all Government expenditure is wasted, although I suspect that that is a Conservative estimate. I am sure that there is plenty of money available—and, in addition,...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c247
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady for that point. I would not wish to deny universities the income that they get from foreign students. My new clause relates specifically to people given leave to remain in this country, which is a slightly different issue.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c245
House
House of Commons

I have limited time left and I still wish to refer to two new clauses. I have tried to be as generous as possible in allowing interventions, but I must now make progress. The purpose of new clause 7 is to ensure that people wishing to claim asylum in this...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c245-6
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister. I must apologise to you, Madam Deputy Speaker, and to the House; I had a meeting with a constituent and the Minister of State, Ministry of Defence, the right hon. Member for East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow (Mr. Ingram), and it overran, which meant...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2007
Reference
460 c214
House
House of Commons