Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Member X
Ed Davey
Subject X
Constitutional and administrative law

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Davey, Ed (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Constitutional and administrative law (10)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Answer the question.

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c225
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has taken a principled stance on this issue over many years. At the time of the Maastricht debate, I was one of the backroom boys for the Liberal Democrats who worked on the treaty as it went through this House as legislation, and I remember the very...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c237
House
House of Commons

Indeed. The real reason why the Conservatives want to debate referendums tonight, despite their embarrassment at dropping their cast-iron guarantee, is that they do not want to debate the real issues on Europe. They have very firm few positions, as we saw when we debated the substance of the Lisbon...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c237-8
House
House of Commons

No, not yet. The Conservatives seem to want to commit us to referendums on almost any conceivable European treaty, however insignificant, but there are other serious problems with the amendment. The hon. Member for Rayleigh was present for the debates about the legislation on Lisbon, so he knows that there...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c238-9
House
House of Commons

We are saying that they should be consulted, but on a question on which we think they want to be consulted. The hon. Member for Rayleigh seems to want multiple referendums, and that is not sensible. We want a clear decision on the matter, but, although I agree with much...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c236
House
House of Commons

As I said at the beginning of my remarks, we believe that there should be a referendum on the future of Britain's membership. There have been so many treaties over the past 20 years, as the right hon. Member for Leicester, East reminded us, and the British people have not...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c236
House
House of Commons

No, because we need a clearer question about Britain's membership of the EU. I hope that that is helpful, but the fact that we would want a different question in the referendum is not the only reason for our opposition to the amendment. Another reason is that we think it...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c235-6
House
House of Commons

I shall make it clear from the start—I hope this will put the hon. Member for Rayleigh (Mr. Francois) out of any pain—that we will not be supporting his amendments tonight. We will be voting against them, and I shall explain why. Liberal Democrats support a referendum on Europe, but...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c235
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman explain the difference between a statutory protection and a constitutional protection? It seems to me that a statutory protection such as that which he and his hon. Friends wish to introduce could be overturned by a Government, who could change the law. It therefore cannot be...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c229
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c229
House
House of Commons