Skip to main content

1-20 of 56 results for subject:Finance

Member X
Nicholas Dakin
Subject X
Further education

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Dakin, Nicholas (56)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Further education (56)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The £200 uplift in 16-to-18 funding is welcome—but it is only a start; it is for only one year; and it falls short of the £760 per student for which Raise the Rate campaigners asked. Will the Secretary of State take an early opportunity to put that right?

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
664 c72
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Minister’s clarification that there is no desire to throw the baby out with the bathwater, and that high-quality qualifications such as BTECs and HNDs, which have served generations of students well, have nothing to fear from this review; indeed, they may well do well from it. How...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2019
Reference
663 c53
House
House of Commons

A shrinking curriculum, larger class sizes, less student contact time and less student support are some of the effects of shrinking student funding for 16 to 18-year-olds. It is time to raise the rate. What order of priority is being given to speaking to the Treasury to ensure that that is done?

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2019
Reference
662 c469
House
House of Commons

What recent representations he has made to the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the adequacy of funding for further education.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Tabled
Date
9 April 2019
Reference
910394
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Sir Roger; I shall rattle through my speech. I thank the hon. Member for Gloucester (Richard Graham) for clearly setting out the case for colleges, which is echoed by the big number of hon. Members attending the debate. I hope that the Government are listening.

Colleges provide a bridge...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 April 2019
Reference
657 cc298-9WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much funding has been allocated to schools and colleges through the large programme uplift in each year since its introduction.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
222718
House
House of Commons

As 16 and 17-year-olds attract 23% less funding than pre-16 students and young people, is it not just time to raise the rate and tackle this problem?

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
654 c3
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend as puzzled as I am that, at £3,300 each, 18-year-olds are the cheapest people in the world to educate, given that, in my experience, people on an additional year are actually the most demanding to teach?

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2019
Reference
653 c305WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Bone. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) for getting the debate off to such a good start, and I congratulate the students from Brockenhurst College on their work to ensure that the debate took place.

We...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2019
Reference
653 cc29-30WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her intervention. One the great colleges in my constituency, John Leggott College, which I was proud to lead, contacted me this week and said that the staff pay increases would be a real challenge for colleges. If the pension increases remain unfunded, that will...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2019
Reference
653 cc340-31WH
House
House of Commons

The national funding rate for 16 to 18-year-olds has been frozen for five years. That is beginning to cause significant problems in delivering for this age group. Will the Government do something about it before it is too late?

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2018
Reference
651 c132
House
House of Commons

What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Education on the adequacy of funding for further education.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2018
Reference
651 c132; 908124
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much money from the public purse has been spent by (a) further education colleges and (b) academies in offering subsidies to attract students in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2018
Reference
193423
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much funding her Department has provided to further education and sixth form colleges since 2010 to support them in tackling homophobic and transphobic bullying.

Asked by
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2015
Reference
7381
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak briefly in support of this debate. We should all seize the opportunity to celebrate vocational qualifications, and it is good that we are doing so today. Vocational qualifications play a huge part in the mix of qualifications that young people and older people gain...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 cc40-1WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on initiating this very important debate, but let me press him further on funding. Although further education colleges are in the vanguard of providing vocational qualifications, they have had to suffer, in addition to the cut in February that my hon. Friend the Member for...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 c36WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that careers advice is crucial, and that it is unfortunate that even today, 63% of young people, when asked,

can name A-levels but cannot name any vocational qualifications? That shows the distance that we need to travel to achieve the parity of esteem that we...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 c37WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that further education has been a Cinderella area of education and training. One reason why I applaud vocational qualifications day is that it represents a real effort to rebalance what we are saying out there, and what is being said back to us. It is...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 c41WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. That is where there is a real danger in the fragmentation of schools, academies, UTCs and other provision. Sadly, the evidence is that in schools with their own sixth form, the quality of careers education, as regards raising awareness of the various pathways available, is lower than in schools...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 cc41-2WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is right that taking on an apprentice—and I have taken on two so far in my current role—helps to educate us as employers about the challenges in taking on such a responsibility. It is hugely rewarding, and we should celebrate the employers’ role.

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2015
Reference
596 c47WH
House
House of Commons