Skip to main content

1-7 of 7 results for subject:"House of Commons"

Member X
Geoffrey Cox
Subject X
Constitutional and administrative law

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Cox, Geoffrey (7)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Constitutional and administrative law (7)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I shall take just a short time to defend from multiple attacks this modest, moderate and practical measure offered by my hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh (Mr. Francois). Some of the positions that have been articulated today by Labour Members—and, indeed, by Liberal Democrats—are almost impossible to comprehend. What...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c248
House
House of Commons

Hon. Members are saying that the provision does not say that. It is a matter of interpretation. In my judgment, if the matter were taken to court, it is inconceivable that a judge would conclude that some minor transfer would trigger this provision, as the hon. Member for Kingston and...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c248-51
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mrs. Heal. It cannot be appropriate for the Minister to descend to such an undignified submission about Opposition Members. It must be wrong to suggest that there is a conflict of interest in that respect.

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c256
House
House of Commons

What does the European Court of Justice mean when it describes something, as it has done in hundreds of its judgments, as being within the exclusive competence or jurisdiction of the European institutions?

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c254
House
House of Commons

Not "right honourable".

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c256
House
House of Commons

If the European Union or its countries have spent years negotiating to produce a treaty, and the changes require a treaty and cannot be made through the ordinary revision procedure, the presumption must be that whatever is being done by the treaty is of some significance and seriousness. Otherwise, dozens...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c253-4
House
House of Commons

Why does the one exclude the other? Why can we not have the referendum on the in-out question, and why should Liberal Democrats not agree to the idea that, when there are substantial transfers in future treaties, the British people are consulted?

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2010
Reference
504 c236
House
House of Commons