Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:"Voting behaviour"

Member X
Lord Cormack

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Cormack, Lord (25)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I entirely agree with what my noble friend just said. Almost every word that has been uttered during this interesting debate underlines the feeling that I have had for a long time that it would be a really sensible thing for us to go back and re-examine the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 c583
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I was first elected to the other place, I was a very staunch believer in parliamentary democracy, full stop, and did not like the idea of introducing the referendum into our system. But the fact is that we have done so, and on a number of constitutional...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c186-8
House
House of Lords

I am extremely grateful to the noble Lord, but when he read out the list of issues which could be subject to a referendum he mentioned the abolition of the monarchy and the abolition of either House. Does he not accept that, if your Lordships’ House is replaced by a...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c183
House
House of Lords

It is nowhere near as high a threshold as has been put in this Bill for a dissolution of Parliament.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c185
House
House of Lords

Yes, of course, but I respectfully say that there should have been consultation before we got into this mess. As I listened, I could not help but remember a quotation from WH Auden, writing just before the last war, who said that every great drama has two acts. In the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c204
House
House of Lords

My Lords, never has a probing amendment produced more in the way of disturbing information from my noble and learned friend. Anyone who knows him likes him. He is an extremely agreeable man who was rightly very popular in the other place and is clearly popular in your Lordships' House,...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c203
House
House of Lords

4: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, leave out ““7 May 2015”” and insert ““27 March 2015””

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c197
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish to detain your Lordships for long on this amendment. I am conscious that there are other very important debates to come, and I am also aware that there is very important dinner break business. I tabled this amendment for one simple reason: I am...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c198
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for his speech, rather than his intervention. This is very much an issue that your Lordships’ House should consider, and the Government should give us a very considered response. There is of course an additional by-product of my amendment. Bringing forward the election...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c199
House
House of Lords

I make one brief point following the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Martin. Surely in a coalition Government the Prime Minister could not do what his partner, the Deputy Prime Minister, did not wish him to do. So why are we here?

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c223
House
House of Lords

If the virtue of five years is to give more time to plan, and I accept the logic of that, why have we not had better planning in the first year of this Parliament?

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c227
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord recollect that in the election of 1974 there were very few postal votes cast? People actually made their way in inclement weather to the polls because they felt strongly about the issues. Have we not made voting too easy with too many postal votes allowed, and...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c161
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lords, Lord Howarth and Lord Rennard, have performed a very real service to the Committee in enabling us to debate this issue. When the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, referred to the Electoral Commission and those dreadful words ““modernisation”” and ““strategy””, I began to have my doubts...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c166
House
House of Lords

I obviously listened carefully to what the noble Lord said, but there have been some disturbing accounts of the way in which postal voting has been conducted, and he knows that as well as I do. The security of the postal vote does not begin to compare with the security...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c166-7
House
House of Lords

The answer is simple: the Government knew that they could not get AV through the House of Commons. Therefore, they have gone to a wider electorate.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c178
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his support. The only circumstance where the death of one candidate in a two-candidate race could conceivably happen is where one of the candidates was the Speaker, because it is the custom that the major parties do not normally contest that...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c277
House
House of Commons

Yes, let us get on.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c264;439 c265
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Member for East Antrim (Sammy Wilson), who is in fact on the Northern Ireland Policing Board, says, we call in the police. Perhaps we should leave that one there. My plight before 5 May underlined a very real problem, and Members in all parts of the House...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c274-5
House
House of Commons

I put forward that proposal in my first speech, when I introduced my Bill. I had talks with the Minister and her officials and with the chairman of the Electoral Commission, but they all felt that it would be difficult to agree on any particular point. I also suggested—this might...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c273;439 c274
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to be able to move new clause 3 and grateful to you, Sir Alan, for grouping it with new clause 2. It has been a long wait, but not quite as long as the wait that I had before I got here in the summer. I begin...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c271-3;439 c272-3
House
House of Commons