Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:"Video recordings"

Member X
Lord Clement-Jones

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Clement-Jones, Lord (11)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, these offences are bad enough by themselves, but does the Minister accept that there is a direct connection between animal

cruelty and violence towards humans? If so, is this not yet another reason why the Government should use the Online Safety Bill to combat animal cruelty offences and make this a priority offence under the Bill?

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 June 2023
Reference
831 c579
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 April 2021
Reference
811 cc125-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today’s SI is a bit of a sideshow compared to the important revised AVMS regulations which came into effect on the first of this month, but it is an opportunity to raise a number of issues. I welcome the transposition of these duties on internet platforms into UK...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2020
Reference
808 cc443-4
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to encourage the adoption of British Board of Film Classification and Video Standards Council best practice guidelines on voluntary age labelling; and what plans they have to introduce legislation on age labelling if it is not implemented voluntarily.

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 November 2020
Reference
HL10057
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for his introduction to the regulations. Over the past 30 years, the Video Recordings Act 1984 has certainly attracted parliamentary debate on a number of occasions. As noble Lords will recall, the Act had to be revived by a special Act in 2010...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2014
Reference
755 cc563-5GC
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to review the operation of the Association for Television on Demand in the regulation of video on demand under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.
Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2011
Reference
729 c122
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that reply, which is reassuring because surely ATVOD is everything an industry-based co-regulatory scheme should not be: expensive, too wide in scope, far from light touch and, indeed, already giving rise to litigation. I am delighted to hear that the DCMS will be making sure that ATVOD is fit for purpose.
Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2011
Reference
729 c122-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that helpful reply, but this is unfinished business from last year’s Digital Economy Act. As my noble friend will have seen, the recent parents’ online poll on the Mumsnet website demonstrates conclusively the importance that parents attach to proper classification of some of those products which are currently exempt. I noted that the Minister said ““by the summer””, but if the evidence is collected earlier than that, will the Government institute the consultation as soon as possible?
Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2011
Reference
726 c731-2
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they will launch a consultation on the current exemptions from regulation under Section 2 of the Video Recordings Act 2010.
Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2011
Reference
726 c731
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his comprehensive introduction of the Bill. We all have the same purpose today. As a result of the then Government failing to notify the European Commission of certain technical aspects—the classification and labelling requirements—of the Video Recordings Act 1984, we now know that...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2010
Reference
716 c781-3
House
House of Lords

I apologise for intervening again. The Minister was pretty clear about the non-retrospective effect of the Bill on the Act. Therefore, the answer to the question I asked about whether the examples in Cheltenham, Powys and so on have got away with it is, presumably, yes.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2010
Reference
716 c787
House
House of Lords