Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Biometrics

Member X
Baroness Carnegy of Lour

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Carnegy of Lour, Baroness (39)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I agree. I support my noble kinsman on this point, because as usual he is very knowledgeable and has thought about this problem thoroughly. Not knowing who has a dual passport in this country and having no sanction against people who do not admit to having one are...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
709 c739
House
House of Lords

While we are considering Clause 49, I ask the noble Lord why this clause is in the Bill at all. When the UK Borders Act 2007 went through your Lordships’ House there was great discussion, in which I took part, about why Scotland was not included in the provision that...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c790
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister but I do not need any more detail; I just wondered what had happened. Clearly the Government have decided that they were wrong last time and have changed their mind. That is very good news.

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2009
Reference
708 c790
House
House of Lords

There are clearly differences of opinion between the noble Lords on the Liberal Democrat Benches and the noble Lord. On the general point about fingerprints, the noble Lord said that the system is used worldwide, which it is, and that it is thoroughly reliable. I hate to say to him...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2007
Reference
693 c132GC
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Minister usually displays a great understanding and sympathy of what it is to be a child. Is he not concerned about the impression that children will get of what it is to live in a free country and what it is to be British if, in order to get the right school meals and other things, they can have their fingerprints taken? That seems completely astonishing to me. I suggest that the Government think hard about this and change their minds.
Asked by
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2007
Reference
690 c1009-10
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as far as I am concerned this has nothing whatever to do with party politics at this stage. I hope that your Lordships listened with some care to the speech of the noble Viscount, Lord Bledisloe, on this Motion, which proposes that in the present circumstances the right thing for your...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2006
Reference
680 c33-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Gould, may continue in his blissful belief that this is a corner of Britain which is completely out of touch with what is going on anywhere else. Since the Bill began its passage through this House and the noble Lord made his speeches, it is...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
677 c1020
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the noble Baroness sits down, did I understand her to say that a citizen will get a card which does not indicate externally what is actually on the chip, and that they will not receive a bit of paper accompanying the card indicating what is on the chip?...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
677 c1009
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Selsdon made one point in particular which interested me very much. He suggested that when people get their card, they should have the contents of the card in writing so that they would know exactly what was on it. That seems essential to me....

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
677 c1005
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Viscount has made an extremely important point that may not have struck most of us. The Bill is a rather ominous sign of the extent to which government has been taken over by spin. One of the main reasons why people have not been as willing...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
677 c964-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, enthusiasm for this amendment must be affected by the importance placed on the liberty of the individual and the reduction of that liberty implied by the scheme’s becoming compulsory. The Joint Committee on the Constitution clearly thought not only that the relationship of the citizen to the Government...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2006
Reference
677 c988-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I regard this as good political advice from the Front Benches. One of the points people raise whenever they talk about this Bill, as I said on a previous amendment, is the addresses they have to give from the past. Something else nearly everyone says is, ““Are they...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
677 c513-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness has enthusiastically told us of some of the benefits, and I shall not argue about that. We are talking about whether or not the benefits outweigh the costs of the Bill. Parliament should know roughly what the cost will be before it accepts the scheme...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
677 c453-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister know whether there have been proper consultations in Scotland about this? I am not in a position to say what the differences are, but there are some differences in the law concerning children. There could possibly be a clash. The Scottish Parliament has said that...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
677 c518
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot help but reflect with some amusement that we had a full discussion about wearing your face on the front of your head and not on the back, whereas we allowed to pass rather quickly the fact that the noble Baroness accepted all the recommendations of the...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
677 c528
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I found myself looking at Amendment No. 7 from the point of view of the person who was registering. Are the Government intending to have a fairly precise instruction regarding previous addresses? From conversations that I have had with people about the Bill, I have discovered that what...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
677 c489
House
House of Lords

I hate to hold up proceedings but the Minister talked about the very important issue of the meaning of consent and gave her view on what the word means in common law. Have the Government checked that this is all right in Scots law as well? It is such a crucial...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1288
House
House of Lords

I appreciate that point. I wonder why, when the Bill was being drafted and the Advocate-General was looking at it and trying to make it fit-in properly for Scotland, the Scottish Executive was not consulted and is not on the list. I find it slightly strange. Obviously the Scottish Executive has not yet...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1276
House
House of Lords

In referring to Clause 11(5), the noble Baroness mentioned the fact that the Scottish Executive is not on the list. I was fascinated, on reading the Bill, to note that this was probably considered to be a measure of propriety. It would be rather a cheek to compel the Scottish Executive to...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1275-6
House
House of Lords

The committee’s recommendations simply say that in four cases the negative resolution procedure should become the affirmative resolution procedure. Is that what the Government are going to implement?

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
676 c1266
House
House of Lords