Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:USA

Member X
Vincent Cable
Subject X
Tanzania

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Tanzania (21)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Surely the Solicitor-General is aware that, before 2002, it was still an offence to engage in false accounting and bribery in the United Kingdom and those were among the matters that were being investigated.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c877
House
House of Commons

May I repeat my point? If the documents on the 1980s were available, we would all be able to gain a better informed view of the economic and other benefits, but is the hon. Gentleman aware that the Treasury, the Bank of England, the Export Credits Guarantee Department and the...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c882
House
House of Commons

One practical way in which the Minister for the Middle East, who I think will be speaking next, could help us is by giving some indication of how the advice from the Saudi Government was received. If it was a formal demarche from the Saudi authorities, that is of a...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c867-8
House
House of Commons

Yes, the issue of jobs is of course important, and it does concern me and I will return to it. However and as the right hon. Gentleman knows, it is not relevant to the anti-bribery case and is specifically precluded by the convention. There is another issue, which I hope...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c866-7
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is rather clutching at straws. If there were any hint that that was the problem, the head of the SFO would surely have indicated that he did not have reservations about the eventual decision. Let me move on to the other issue, which, in many ways, is...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c866
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friends just commented from a sedentary position, in that case there is absolutely nothing to be lost from publishing it. Moreover, I understand that—The Daily Telegraph has reported this—there was a second report in 1997, which updated the previous one and is more relevant to the account...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c864-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House notes the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) ongoing investigation into the sale by BAE Systems plc of a military air traffic control system to Tanzania and other arms-related inquiries; further notes that the SFO has ceased its investigation into BAE Systems plc and Saudi Arabia;...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c863
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman puts the point well. That is indeed what is humiliating this country and the Government in our dealings with other OECD countries. We have now signed an international agreement to that effect.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c870
House
House of Commons

I think that it has been financially and economically highly questionable. It is a future issue as well as a past issue, because the ECGD still needs to make a judgment on export credit for the current negotiations. Among other things, it will need to produce a warrant attesting to...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c869
House
House of Commons

It is economically illiterate to say that any £40 billion deal is acceptable at any price. Had the hon. Gentleman’s party known about the corruption involved, I suspect that he would have had great reservations about it.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c869
House
House of Commons

They would not necessarily have been tarnished in the way that has been portrayed by the Government. I am merely echoing the judgments that were made by, for example, the Treasury, the ECGD and the Bank of England, which all considered that that deal was extremely bad for Britain. That...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c868
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman normally has a higher standard of wit than that. I was talking about our relationships with developing countries. I do not know whether the Minister for the Middle East has seen the DVD that his Department is promoting around Africa, but it is a sort of do-it-yourself...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c871
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is rehearsing the legal arguments for one side, but there is another side—our Serious Fraud Office. In view of what he has said, it is all the more regrettable that BAE Systems has been denied its day in court, when it could have made these points itself....

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c871
House
House of Commons

I have given the Minister a go, so I shall just wind up my remarks. The main and final point that I want to make about the cost of the decision to this country has to do with the damage done to this House of Parliament by the suppression of...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c871-2
House
House of Commons

I was going to come on to that point, but I have read the comments by the company carefully, as I was surprised to note that BAE Systems never denied that large commissions were paid. It was open about that, but it has claimed that it was not, legally speaking,...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c870-1
House
House of Commons

National security considerations must of course be at the centre of decisions of this kind. The point that I made earlier was that all the evidence that has emerged shows that that was not the advice of the intelligence services. Had it been, the story would have been a very...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c870
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has tried once, and I am sure that he will have another attempt shortly. The report was suppressed in 1992, but it is now clear that the reason had nothing to do with national security, because the whole al-Qaeda operation was not in flow then—indeed, it was...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c872
House
House of Commons

Well, I am sure that the Minister who makes that assertion has read Mr. Mitchell’s book. If all those facts are known and in the public domain, why are the Government concerned about keeping the report hidden? It may be that it establishes that no criminal offence has been committed:...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c872-3
House
House of Commons

Al-Yamamah arms agreement. Fifth opposition day debate (part 1). Motion negatived on division (74 to 309). Amendment agreed on question.

Lead member
Vincent Cable
Answering member
Kim Howells
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c863-912
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman can make a speech in due course. The question that we on these Benches ask is: why has the report—uniquely in the history of the House—not been released?

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2007
Reference
456 c872
House
House of Commons