Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Patients

Member X
Andy Burnham
Subject X
Education

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Burnham, Andy (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Education (13)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I have answered the right hon. Gentleman's question. It was an entirely different situation altogether. On the suggestion that we are setting our face against reform, we have not said that, and I as Secretary of State initiated a review of the private patient cap, because the issue came up...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c720
House
House of Commons

Non-foundation trusts were managed by the Department, and the Department's policy, during our time in government, was to have a tight cap—[Interruption]. There was a tight cap on the income that trusts could earn, so the very fact of foundation trusts' creation gave rise to the question of whether there...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c720
House
House of Commons

It is not rubbish. They can earn 49% of their income, according to this Bill, from the treatment of private patients. That is a fact, and why the hon. Lady shouts ““rubbish”” I have no idea.

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c720
House
House of Commons

Let me answer that directly. The Financial Times has analysed the latest data on actual NHS income earned through the treatment of private patients and demonstrated that in the last year not a single hospital trust would have been caught by this so-called safeguarding amendment. It used the example of...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c719
House
House of Commons

No, I do not, is the answer—[Interruption.] Well, what has that proved? We had trusts earning income, but the foundation trust legislation set a cap: it allowed the principle but tightly controlled it for the vast majority of hospitals. That was its purpose. This Bill removes those tight controls. This...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c720
House
House of Commons

It is important to begin by setting out the background to many of the amendments in this group. Despite the pause that the Government ordered for the Bill, they failed to allay fears about the creation of a market based on a 1980s utility privatisation, with Monitor acting as an...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c718-9
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I am not at all reassured by that, or in fact by anything the Minister says. The letter that we have from the Deputy Prime Minister spoke of insulating the NHS from European competition law, but I am still waiting to see the amendment that delivers...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c722-3
House
House of Commons

I am not going to debate that now. The right hon. Gentleman is going to have to defend himself on whether he has his facts right. I do not think that he has. We need to put firmly on the record that there are real flaws in the Liberal Democrats'...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c722
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman should make a speech if he wants to make interventions of that length. We had a cap to protect the interests of private patients; he is getting rid of the cap, and he is going to have to explain to patients in his constituency, if waiting lists...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c721
House
House of Commons

That is the ideological difference between us. The hon. Gentleman says that the decision should be at the hospital's discretion, but the Bill essentially sets everybody on their own. Hospitals are being told, ““You're on your own. There's none of the support from the centre any more, no bail-outs, as...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c720-1
House
House of Commons

The amendment gives us no protection at all, and it gives us no protection from the NHS cross-subsidising private care. There is nothing in the Bill which says, ““The whole costs of the provision of that care have to be reimbursed to the national health service””, as the Financial Times...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c721-2
House
House of Commons

I listened to what the right hon. Gentleman said about misrepresentation and I wonder who he had in mind. Did he have in mind the members of his own party who went to Gateshead and asked for the Lords not to support the Third Reading of the Bill, although they...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c746
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2012
Reference
542 c725
House
House of Commons