Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for subject:"Voting behaviour"

Member X
Lord Brennan of Canton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Brennan of Canton, Lord (27)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right hon. Friend is right. I shall come to that point. The Minister is still trying to obfuscate over the threshold and suggest that in some way it would negate the proposals in the Bill. What is unusual about the proposed referendum is that the Government are making it...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1087-8
House
House of Commons

Like my hon. Friend the Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant), I support AV and will vote yes in the referendum. Hon. Members might wonder about the Minister's desperate desire to sit down without explaining the amendment that he is asking us to send back to the House of Lords. He...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1087
House
House of Commons

To return to the amendment in lieu that the Minister has proposed, does my hon. Friend agree that it effectively constitutes a direct insult to the other House, first because of its puerile nature and the fact that it is totally unrelated to the amendments from the other place, and...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1080
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1077
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1076
House
House of Commons

I understand the Minister's point about the technical reasons for the Government's amendment, but does he not owe it to the House to explain what he considers to be the benefits of the amendment if we are to vote on it?

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
523 c1074
House
House of Commons

It might not have been entirely inappropriate for the hon. Lady to intervene, because, as I recall from my visit to Corby as a young man, most of it was populated by Scots and Welsh people, who were there to set up the steelworks at the time. On the date...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c808
House
House of Commons

I do not want to push the point too far, but it is a serious point. Normally, people are issued with a pencil at polling stations. Given that, as the Minister has confirmed, the ““black ink”” instruction did not appear in the original version, I am intrigued that it has...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c799
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend knows it is unwise not to give way to me, because it might end up in a point of order. I have described this Bill as a Wallace and Gromit Bill because of the way in which, rather like Gromit in ““The Wrong Trousers””, the Government are...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c802
House
House of Commons

I will attempt to be reasonably concise. It is worth returning to the amendments, which are about the combination of polls, and reminding ourselves—and the literally dozens of people who I am sure are still watching on the BBC Parliament channel, after our deliberations so far—why we are discussing combining...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c820
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is entirely right, and that point has been clearly made during the debate. We know that that is the reality. Debates on national elections in Scotland and Wales, and elections in Northern Ireland, will be swamped in the general UK media by discussion about the referendum on...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c821
House
House of Commons

Of course, Mr Deputy Speaker. The point that I was making was that the very reason for the amendments that are before us, about the combination of polls, is to do with the beliefs of one person, who has put up the Minister, as it were, to come along and...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c820-1
House
House of Commons

We have found out what respect means to the hon. Lady. For me it means having mutual respect, and when the previous Administration offered devolved government to people in England, they turned it down. It is a matter of respect that if people in England do not want devolved government,...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c822
House
House of Commons

I fear that I will test your patience, Mr Deputy Speaker, if I make a further reference to he who shall not be named, but clearly my hon. Friend is absolutely correct. My point, Mr Deputy Prime Minister—I mean Mr Deputy Speaker; that was a Freudian slip, and he shall...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c822
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm now—or, if not, later in that letter—whether, if an elector does not use black ink, the postal vote will not be invalidated?

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c826
House
House of Commons

I will give way in a moment, but first I want to make my second point, about why I think the hon. Lady is wrong. One of the first actions by her leader, when he became Prime Minister—many of us thought it was commendable at the time—was to visit the...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c821
House
House of Commons

Bismarck.

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c870
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady acknowledge that the date of the referendum is not set in stone in the coalition agreement, and that it is simply a part of the Bill? Does she also agree that the Deputy Prime Minister's desire to maximise the chances of winning the referendum by holding...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c872-3
House
House of Commons

I notice that the instructions set out in amendment 156 ask voters to complete the ballot paper and form ““in black ink””. Is the same instruction in the original Bill, and by building this provision directly into the Bill would we invalidate the ballot papers or forms of voters who...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c798
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that. The Minister might be able to elucidate later whether the requirement for black ink was part of the original instruction. My fear is that when something is written directly on the face of a Bill, it is sometimes open to a more literal interpretation than the Minister...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2010
Reference
517 c798
House
House of Commons