Skip to main content

1-20 of 126 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Member X
Stuart Bell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bell, Stuart (126)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The hon. Lady makes a valid point. We have examined proper advice on employment law and we will do that again. However, I assure hon. Members that the most complete analysis and investigation of that serious matter will be undertaken. Members of the Commission, under Mr. Speaker's chairmanship, are well...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1078
House
House of Commons

I always enjoy hearing the hon. Lady, but history gets rewritten quickly. If she reads Hansard tomorrow, she will realise that I did not say what she claims.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1079
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman's point touches on what the shadow Leader of the House said. There is a perception in the public domain that the salaries of Members of Parliament's secretaries and assistants are part of our income. I was on a TV programme with Andrew Neil, who said to the...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1078-9
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes her point, which is a matter for the Government, not me as a member of the House of Commons Commission. I simply say that, between now and 29 October, staff salaries and their relation to Members of Parliament will be carefully considered.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1079
House
House of Commons

I have only 10 minutes to spend on the subject and I should like to make some progress. The shadow Leader of the House mentioned the Green Book and that it is only a month old. The Green Book is a book of principles and governance and it carefully states...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1079-80
House
House of Commons

I assure my hon. Friend that no decisions will be made without a full review by the House of every aspect of the evidence.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1079
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has hit on an important point. Not only is there the question of transfer; there is also the question of pensions and pension rights, which is a major matter that we will need to consider.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1080
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a point similar to that which the Opposition made earlier about the anxiety among staff, even if we have a general election and there are changes in the membership of the House, about what would happen to them. As I am indicating, at this moment in...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1080
House
House of Commons

That is a pertinent point. The Leader of the House said that the House of Commons Commission would examine the matter carefully between now and 29 October. My right hon. and learned Friend was asked whether it would take evidence and representations. I assure hon. Members that, under the chairmanship...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1078
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak early in the debate and to follow my right hon. and learned Friend the Leader of House. I also speak as a member of the House of Commons Commission and of the Members Estimate Committee. I welcome my right hon. and learned...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1077-8
House
House of Commons

I have been talked out on the Floor of the House. This is a debate of the utmost importance—constitutionally, for this Chamber and for Members of Parliament. We belong to the future, as well as the past. We must remember that point, because it is extremely important—a sovereign people and...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1081
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point about the transfer from the incidental expenses provision to salaries, which is also one that we may look at.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1081
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Meg Munn) makes another point, from a sedentary position, which I have already made to the authorities. There is such a thing as TUPE—the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981, which we passed through this House many years ago. As...

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1080
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point.

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
491 c1080
House
House of Commons
Good morning, Mr. Speaker. The proposal, which recognises that housing is an important element in the terms of service of office holders, seeks the provision of appropriate accommodation and the establishment of a consistent framework to govern the relationship between housing providers and office holders.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101
House
House of Commons
I welcome the hon. Gentleman to these question sessions, and I also welcome the pertinence of his question. Clearly, the matter he raises preoccupies Members of the House. The General Synod will be aware of that when it meets next week, and I have no doubt that the views expressed here will be taken into account in its debates.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
I can assure the hon. Gentleman that we shall listen very carefully to the views of the General Synod next week. As he will know, ““Render unto Caesar that which belongs to Caesar””. To reverse the role, we must render unto the General Synod that which belongs to the General Synod. It will meet next week to discuss the matter. There are differences of views, but the hon. Gentleman, who is a member of the Synod, will be able to participate in those proceedings as well as the proceedings here.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101-2
House
House of Commons
In order to enlighten my hon. Friend and the House on what will be proposed and debated at the Synod next week, I can tell him that the primary aim of the legislation is to improve the security of the clergy by giving them rights equivalent to those enjoyed by employees under the Employment Relations Act 1999. As I said, the General Synod will consider that significant piece of legislation next week, and we await the outcome of its considerations.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
With reference to the Ecclesiastical Offices (Terms of Service) Measure, for what reason the ownership of a parsonage house is being removed from incumbents and vested in the diocese.
Asked by
Robert Key (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101; 185162
House
House of Commons
The legislation to which the hon. Gentleman refers will improve the security of tenure of the clergy and ensure that they are able to exercise the duties of their offices competently.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
469 c442
House
House of Commons