Skip to main content

1-20 of 48 results for subject:Schools

Member X
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Subject X
Appeals

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bassam of Brighton, Lord (48)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Appeals (48)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My recollection is that the noble Earl, Lord Onslow, is a graduate of Eton, so perhaps he knows more about it. Or perhaps I have got that wrong.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c157
House
House of Lords

My noble friend Lord Borrie says that it is in law. The important thing, as I have said, is the public benefit test.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c157
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord   Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, made the important point that we have sought to achieve a delicate balance in the Bill. That is exactly what we have tried to do. I have heard what my noble friend Lord Campbell-Savours and others have said in setting out the rationale...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c156-7
House
House of Lords

That is a rather broader question.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c157
House
House of Lords

That is right; I offered a definition of religion, which holds good for this Bill as well.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c150
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 7:"Page 3, line 3, at end insert—" ““(5A)   Any reference in any enactment or document (in whatever terms)— (a)   to charitable purposes, or (b)   to institutions having purposes that are charitable under charity law, is to be construed in accordance with subsection (1). (5B)   Subsection (5A)— (a)   applies whether the enactment or...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to answer the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, first, they are not covering McColl points. I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising the point. As ever, the noble Lord, Lord Phillips of Sudbury, is, I am sure, trying to be helpful. I do not...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I believed that this would be a lengthy discussion and I was not disappointed. I have listened very carefully to what my noble friend Lord Wedderburn and supporters of his amendments have said, and to other contributions during the course of the debate. It is important, not least...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c144-7
House
House of Lords

That may well be the case,   but I am not going to make that judgment this afternoon.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c147
House
House of Lords

It is not for me to make that argument. It is for Animists to do that.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c147
House
House of Lords

We covered the ground introduced through the amendment thoroughly in the previous debate. Those arguments hold good for this amendment, as they did for the earlier one. I do not accept that secularism, as opposed to theistic beliefs, has second-class status in terms of this piece of legislation. We see...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c149-50
House
House of Lords

We return to the issue of independence. I thought we had already got ourselves to a good position during the debates on the Bill prior to the election, but I am not surprised that the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson has come back to this in another form, and I congratulate...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c174-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to respond to this amendment because, although I ultimately have to resist it, it is one that has usefully focused on an important part of the Charity Commission’s work. We certainly agree with the principle and the spirit behind the amendment; that is, that charities...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c179
House
House of Lords

I think that the answer to the noble Lord’s question is ““No””, but I would like to set that out more clearly. Of course, I will as usual ensure that the letter is circulated to those who are interested.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c170
House
House of Lords

The Government introduced the community amateur sports scheme (CASC) as an alternative to charitable status for amateur sports clubs in 2002. As the noble Lord, Lord   Phillips of Sudbury, knows, it gives qualifying clubs many but not all of the tax reliefs that charities enjoy from both direct taxation and property...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c172
House
House of Lords

Clearly, the contents of the document would be taken into consideration if there were some form of legal challenge. The commission’s document makes it clear that it can carry out public benefit checks under the Bill as drafted. In describing how it would approach an apparent lack of public benefit...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c169-70
House
House of Lords

We have certainly had a   wide-ranging debate on this amendment, with support for the proposal made by the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, coming from interesting quarters. The Bill requires, through Clause 4, the Charity Commission to publish guidance on the operation of the public benefit requirement. The public benefit requirement is...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c168-9
House
House of Lords

I am very much drawn to what the noble Lord, Lords Swinfen, had to say on this issue. The construction proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, might leave us in a less flexible situation and make it more difficult for the Charity Commission in certain circumstances. I am advised...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c160
House
House of Lords

Before I get into the meat of the arguments that have been advanced in support of these two amendments, I ought first to issue a ““welcome back”” to everybody who has contributed to this Bill over the many hours, days, weeks and months that we considered it very carefully before...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c134-6
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord will let me finish. I listened to the force of the argument made by the noble and gallant Lord. I want to reflect a little more on the first of his amendments, but I also wish to make   it plain that I will have to continue to...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2005
Reference
673 c136
House
House of Lords