Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for subject:Defence

Member X
John Baron
Subject X
Conditions of employment

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Baron, John (37)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Conditions of employment (37)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

For those of us who felt compelled to vote down the previous withdrawal agreement and deal, I would suggest that this deal has indeed been worth waiting for, and, as indicated last week, I will support it in the Lobby tonight. The Prime Minister has proved his critics wrong. The...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 cc882-3
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady referred to me, so I thank her for giving way. Some of us were shaking our heads because we disagree with one or two of the

factual statements made by the right hon. Member for East Antrim, but we are happy to pursue that conversation afterwards....

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c883
House
House of Commons

I accept what my hon. Friend has said about the MOD’s cash envelope, but surely this comes down to national priorities. The plan was not to wind down the regulars to such a degree without first ensuring that the reservists could take their place, but the plan has changed. None...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1268
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is being very generous in giving way, and I appreciate the tone in which he is setting out his case, but may I address his central point by reminding him that the delay or postponement—the pause—need not be long at all because the report could be laid...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 cc1269-1270
House
House of Commons

New clause 3 and consequential amendments tabled in my name and that of other hon. Members will, if successful, postpone the implementation of the Government’s reservist plans until their viability and cost-effectiveness have been scrutinised and accepted by Parliament. I should clarify what these amendments are not about, because a...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1271
House
House of Commons

I will very directly answer both those questions. I completely agree that the report the Government would submit would be subject to the scrutiny of this House and a vote, but the fact that the Secretary of State seems concerned about that points to a bigger story about the reforms....

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1271
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend. The restructuring of other areas of government, such as the NHS, has been subject to the scrutiny of this place, yet here we are undertaking a major restructuring—the Secretary of State cannot disagree with that—of the Army and we are not prepared to subject...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1272
House
House of Commons

I very much agree. I sometimes think in this place, where there is no shortage of former serving soldiers, that Front Benchers can be a little too sensitive about how stoical troops are. Their job is to get on with it, particularly if they are professional soldiers. They know these...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1272
House
House of Commons

What the Secretary of State cannot get away from, however, is that this is not that sort of report. It would be the equivalent of a speech to the House followed by questions; it would not be subject to proper parliamentary scrutiny and a vote. We are talking about proper...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 cc1272-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will just have to accept that we are suggesting a brief pause. Why should Parliament not be able to ask for a brief pause in a process that is clearly not going to plan, with recruitment targets being missed, an ever-widening capability gap and rising costs? If...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1273
House
House of Commons

If I could just answer the question. I thank my right hon. Friend the Member for North East Hampshire (Mr Arbuthnot) for his kind words, but let us be clear: there have been three major tranches of redundancies in the regulars already. I think a fourth one is due shortly,...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1273
House
House of Commons

To save my hon. Friend mentioning texts and e-mails a third time, I can assure him that I have no shortage of texts and e-mails from reservists and members of the TA saying, “Yes, you’re absolutely right. These plans are not working and it would be right to pause and...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1274
House
House of Commons

I hear what the hon. Gentleman says, but I am focusing my remarks on the reservists—that is what the Bill is about—rather than full-time regulars. I suggest that we could very easily reverse the cuts to the regulars because, as things stand, more people are willing to become regular soldiers...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1274
House
House of Commons

I completely disagree; it is not grossly unfair at all. In fact, my hon. Friend highlights the fact that we have fundamental problems with the way the system works. If people are having to wait 13 months for computer systems to talk to each other, then that, if anything, reinforces...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1275
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is ascribing a victory to me before it has taken place. The bottom line is that the new clause, like the Bill, would not take effect until the Act receives Royal Assent in the spring of next year. If he is as confident as he says...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1275
House
House of Commons

I disagree with my hon. Friend. The intention behind the new clause is very straightforward; it does what it says on the can. These plans are not working and a series of things are going wrong, and it merely says, “Let’s pause for a moment to make sure that the...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 cc1275-7
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that my hon. Friend has asked that question. It completely misses the point, and illustrates the weakness of the Front-Bench position. I am not saying for one moment that the present Secretary of State has said anything other than what he has said. My point is that...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1277
House
House of Commons

I completely agree with my hon. Friend. To double the mobilisation is a big enough challenge. The plan represents a fundamental change in another respect, which provides a further reason to scrutinise it in some detail. I am proud to have served alongside TA soldiers, but the bottom line is...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1278
House
House of Commons

I will not, if my hon. Friend does not mind; I am responding to another intervention.

Those TA soldiers were in-filling, but let us not forget that part of the present plan is to deploy Reservists as units. That is very different from what has happened before; it represents yet another...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1278
House
House of Commons

I will not give way. I have given way three times to my hon. Friend the Member for Canterbury, and I must conclude my remarks, as I know other Members want to speak.

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
570 c1278
House
House of Commons