Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Member X
Lord Bach
Subject X
By-elections

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Bach, Lord (21)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
By-elections (21)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have said that the procedure is the same as for all Bills. In other words, all Members, if they are so minded, have the right to put down amendments to Bills. The timetable is speeded up considerably. I cannot assist the House much more on this subject....

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c965
House
House of Lords

I would argue that we have kept up the momentum. It is essential that this House is able to deal with disciplinary issues effectively. Last year, the Privileges Committee concluded that this House did not have the powers it needed to expel Peers, or to withhold a writ of summons...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c962-4
House
House of Lords

I do not have the answer. I suspect that I know what the answer to the noble Lord’s question is and I will certainly answer it when I come to wind up the debate later today. Part 5 contains a package of measures which relate to your Lordships’ House. The...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c961-2
House
House of Lords

I think that the answer is none, but some other Bills that have gone through wash-up are extremely important and have had a great influence on our national life, not least Bills on education, criminal justice and other matters. I dare say we will discuss this later this afternoon and...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot comment on whether wash-up will begin soon or not. It is an entirely theoretical consideration at this stage. I can say to my noble friend, and I choose my words carefully, that as the House will know, the wash-up is a regular feature at the end...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

Undoubtedly, the noble Lord and others feel strongly about this matter. We are now 10 years down the line. For 10 years, these by-elections have taken place.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

Most Members of Parliament, even on the noble Lord’s side, would agree that we break with great difficulty the principle of one Member in one constituency. On the House of Lords, the issue is pretty stark. I was most impressed by the noble Lords elected as hereditary Peers, two of...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

I am not in a position tonight to give details of the Government’s proposals. Much as my noble friend may tempt me, I will not fall into that trap. The aim of the Government, if re-elected, would be substantial reform of the House of Lords in the way I have...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1048-50
House
House of Lords

I think that it is the issue of additional Members that caused the Government some problem with that. All those who serve in the House of Commons should represent a particular constituency. I do not want to get into this argument tonight. I know that there are strong feelings on...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

I would like to agree with the right reverend Prelate, but for me, at least, and, I should have thought that for many Members of another place and many noble Lords, the idea that there should not be one Member of Parliament for one constituency makes the issue very difficult...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1050
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord should know that a draft Bill is not always the Bill that is finally produced. The workings of government are such that sometimes these things take longer than they should. I concede that, but for the noble Lord to get too high and mighty about that happening...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1054
House
House of Lords

The answer that the noble Lord, Lord Steel, gave to this question a bit earlier—

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1051
House
House of Lords

You are about to get one if you will be patient. The answer is the same as that given by the noble Lord, Lord Steel. The changes to be made to the House of Lords, some of them in this Bill, represent a change from the position as it was...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1052
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl has reminded me yet again tonight why he is here—I will not use his phrase. That is why we will have in our manifesto a commitment to an elected House of Lords as quickly as possible. I must move on. I should say something about the tax...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1052-3
House
House of Lords

Let me be frank with the noble Lord. He has more knowledge of government than I will ever have, and he will know better than most that sometimes within government it takes time to come to an agreement about what should or should not be in a Bill. Various departments...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1053
House
House of Lords

I think I have got the noble Lord’s point. I am coming up to 30 minutes. The House has been very patient with me. I hope that large parts of the Bill will become law because I think that they are not contentious but will add value in a number...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1054
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl makes his point, which has perhaps been made ad nauseam today. It is a good point, which I shall deal with in my own time at the end of my remarks. I want to deal with the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Steel, and I genuinely...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1048
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, and quite genuinely, believe it or not, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I have not agreed with every word—not with many of them, actually—but the quality of the speeches has been great. The expertise that we have seen on Civil Service...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1047-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, much of the Bill crosses familiar territory for your Lordships. It was preceded by the Government’s draft Constitutional Renewal Bill which was published in March 2008 for pre-legislative scrutiny. The draft Bill was also put out for public consultation in the Government’s draft legislative programme. In total this...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c959-61
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c958
House
House of Lords