Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,128 results for subject:Injunctions

House X
House of Lords

Type

House

House of Lords (1,128)

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin with a brief explanation of what this instrument is not. It is not a mechanism for extending legal aid, and it does not represent a change to legal aid policy. It does not introduce any new pressure on legal aid, and thus we do not expect...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc440-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for laying this instrument. We on these Benches support the order. As the Minister explained, this is a largely technical instrument. It ensures that legal aid continues to be available where new civil orders introduced by the Crime and Policing Act replace or mirror...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 cc442-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen of Elie, for welcoming this statutory instrument. The answer to his question on the legal aid agencies is yes; we are ready for that. This instrument, as the noble and learned Lord said, is a necessary step...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
857 c443GC
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 1 disagreed to on division (86 to 178). Amendment 4 agreed to. Amendment 7 agreed to on division (205 to 188). Amendment 11 agreed to. Amendment 13 agreed to on division (213 to 150). Amendments 15 to 17 agreed to. Amendment 18 disagreed to...

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Lord Katz
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-660
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Doocey

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 4, leave out “just and convenient” and insert “necessary and proportionate”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment amends the test for imposing a respect order to require the court to be satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate to make the order for the purpose...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c612
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the House; I was not ready, but it is worth waiting for. This amendment would change the legal test for imposing a respect order, requiring the court to consider this step “necessary and proportionate”, and not merely “just and convenient”, in preventing a person engaging...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc612-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey. As I understand the Government’s position, they accept that it would not be appropriate to impose such an order unless it is necessary and proportionate, and indeed that is the test applied by the European Convention on...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c613
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a lot in this group. The Government are undoubtedly sincere in wanting to use the Bill to further tackle anti-social behaviour, and such moves to take on this blight on communities will certainly be popular. However, we have to pause a moment and say that there...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc614-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendment tabled in my name. As noble Lords know, I am terrible with the billion rules that we have in this place, so bear with me. This amendment would make a small change that would make a big difference to many residents around...

Member
Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c617
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendments in my noble friend Lady Doocey’s name and mine, which seek to ensure that the Government’s new anti-social behaviour powers are grounded in evidence, proportionality and democratic accountability, as well as to other amendments in this group.

On these Benches, we do not...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc617-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it will come as no surprise to the Minister that these Benches maintain our opposition to the Government’s respect orders. We have heard, in Committee and today, many concerns about the new regime. Our concerns are slightly different from some of those expressed by other noble Lords, in...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc619-620
House
House of Lords

It is good to be back, is it not? It feels like we have been away for ages and now here we are again, back for another session of interesting amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. I am grateful to all noble Lords for tabling them.

As the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc620-1
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister accept that it is very difficult ever to think of circumstances in which it would be appropriate for a court to impose a respect order, with all the implications that has for an individual, unless the court is satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c621
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made his point. I am trying to give the defence from the Government’s perspective. That is our view. He has made a reasonable point, but that is our view and I hope he accepts our comments on those issues in good faith.

On Amendment 2, I hope...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc621-3
House
House of Lords

I rise just to clarify and to help the Minister. I would not want in any way to stop the Government implementing their manifesto promises. The aim of the review was not to stop respect orders; it was to suggest that the anti-social behaviour on the statute book was reviewed...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c622
House
House of Lords

I am always grateful for the noble Baroness’s help on these matters. It is as rare as hen’s teeth normally, but I am always grateful. I still say to her that the implementation of respect orders is crucial to ensuring that we tackle anti-social behaviour effectively. I put it to...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 cc622-4
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister. Nobody doubts or questions that addressing anti-social behaviour is a manifesto commitment; that is taken as read. However, if it is a manifesto commitment, it must be put in words that clearly describe what the Government are trying to say. I find it...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c624
House
House of Lords

As ever, I am genuinely sorry that I have not been able to persuade the noble and right reverend Lord of the Government’s case. We have taken the view that “just and convenient” mirrors the civil injunction regime of the 2014 Act, passed by a Conservative and Liberal Democrat Government....

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I remain unpersuaded. The Minister keeps mentioning the manifesto commitment, but the manifesto makes no mention of the liability threshold for a respect order, so it is surely perfectly legitimate to question the basis on which the respect order the Government are introducing is based.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c625
House
House of Lords