1-20 of 1,230 results for subject:Police
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.262 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.012 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Police
- We searched for
- subject_t:Police OR subject_t:"Police officers" OR subject_ses:92476
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
Moved by
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Moved by
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Moved by
Lord Coaker
Moved by
Lord Coaker
My Lords, I beg to move the Motion in my name. I will leave the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, to speak to his worthwhile and important amendment and, in view of the time, will concentrate on those in my name, namely A1 and B2. Amendment A1 would remove the noise...
My Lords, I beg to move the Motion in my name. I will leave the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, to speak to his worthwhile and important amendment and, in view of the time, will concentrate on those in my name, namely A1 and B2. Amendment A1 would remove the noise...
More!
More!
No. As an aside, I googled double-gazing companies, just in case the Minister wanted a hand with that. However, I thought that was not taking this, or dealing with this, with the seriousness it needs. I get criticised for using humour but the reason I do so is not to...
No. As an aside, I googled double-gazing companies, just in case the Minister wanted a hand with that. However, I thought that was not taking this, or dealing with this, with the seriousness it needs. I get criticised for using humour but the reason I do so is not to...
My Lords, for all the reasons explained by the noble Lord, Lord Coaker, we support Motions A1 and B2 on the noise trigger. Specifically, asking the police to anticipate what noise levels a
protest that has yet to take place might result in is likely to bring the police into...
My Lords, for all the reasons explained by the noble Lord, Lord Coaker, we support Motions A1 and B2 on the noise trigger. Specifically, asking the police to anticipate what noise levels a
protest that has yet to take place might result in is likely to bring the police into...
My Lords, I rise briefly to offer the Green group’s support for Motions A1 and B1. Another thought the police might have to consider is the historical place: how their judgment might be judged, both at that moment and later in history.
I have on my office wall a cartoon from...
My Lords, I rise briefly to offer the Green group’s support for Motions A1 and B1. Another thought the police might have to consider is the historical place: how their judgment might be judged, both at that moment and later in history.
I have on my office wall a cartoon from...
My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. I say from the outset that these provisions do not enable the police to ban noisy protests. They enable the police to attach conditions to a protest in relation to the generation of noise. That is quite...
My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. I say from the outset that these provisions do not enable the police to ban noisy protests. They enable the police to attach conditions to a protest in relation to the generation of noise. That is quite...
My Lords, I wish to test the opinion of the House on Motion A1.
My Lords, I wish to test the opinion of the House on Motion A1.
Moved by
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Moved by
Baroness Williams of Trafford
I have already spoken to Motion B, so I beg to move.
Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B)
I have already spoken to Motion B, so I beg to move.
Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B)
Moved by
Lord Paddick
Moved by
Lord Paddick
I wish to test the opinion of the House.
I wish to test the opinion of the House.
Moved by
Lord Coaker
Moved by
Lord Coaker
I beg to move.
I beg to move.
My Lords, in moving Motion A, and with the leave of the House, I will also speak to Motion B.
We return to familiar ground, namely the powers of the police to attach conditions to a protest, in particular relating to the generation of noise. In our last debate
on these issues,...
My Lords, in moving Motion A, and with the leave of the House, I will also speak to Motion B.
We return to familiar ground, namely the powers of the police to attach conditions to a protest, in particular relating to the generation of noise. In our last debate
on these issues,...
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Motion A, to not insist on amendment 73 or disagreement with amendment 73C and 74A, to not insist on amendment 74B in lieu, or on consequential amendments 74C-G, to not insist on amendment 87 or on disagreement with amendment 87A-F and 87H, and to agree with amendments 73E in lieu and amendment 87K. Motion A1 moved in amendment to motion A. Motion A1 disagreed to on division (133 to 180). Motion A agreed to. Motion B, to not insist on amendment 80 and to not insist on disagreement to amendments 80A-f and amendment 80H, and not to insist on amendment 80J and to agree with Commons amendment 80K. Motion B1 moved in amendment to motion B. Motion B1 disagreed to on division (84 to 171). Motion B2 moved as amendment to motion B. Motion B2 disagreed to on division (113 to 169). Motion B agreed to.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Motion A, to not insist on amendment 73 or disagreement with amendment 73C and 74A, to not insist on amendment 74B in lieu, or on consequential amendments 74C-G, to not insist on amendment 87 or on disagreement with amendment 87A-F and 87H, and to agree...
Consideration of Lords message. Motion, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 73, insists on its Amendment 73C to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement to that Amendment, insists on its Amendment 74A to Lords Amendment 74, disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 74B to that Amendment in lieu, disagrees with the Lords in their consequential Amendments 74C, 74D, 74E, 74F and 74G, insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 87, insists on its Amendments 87A, 87B, 87C, 87D, 87E, 87F and 87H to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement to that Amendment but proposes Amendment (a) in lieu of Lords Amendment 73 and additional Amendment (b) to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 87. Agreed to on division (300 votes to 220). Motion, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 80, insists on its Amendments 80A, 80B, 80C, 80D, 80E, 80F and 80H to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement with that Amendment, disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 80J instead of the words left out by that Amendment but proposes additional Amendment (a) to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 80. Agreed to on division (302 votes to 221).
Consideration of Lords message. Motion, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 73, insists on its Amendment 73C to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement to that Amendment, insists on its Amendment 74A to Lords Amendment 74, disagrees with the Lords...
I beg to move,
That this House insists on its disagreement with Lords in their Amendment 73, insists on its Amendment 73C to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement to that Amendment, insists on its Amendment 74A to Lords Amendment 74, disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment...
I beg to move,
That this House insists on its disagreement with Lords in their Amendment 73, insists on its Amendment 73C to the words restored to the Bill by its disagreement to that Amendment, insists on its Amendment 74A to Lords Amendment 74, disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment...