Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:USA

Legislation X
Protecting against the Effects of the Extraterritorial Application of Third Country Legislation (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Protecting against the Effects of the Extraterritorial Application of Third Country Legislation (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 (11)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
George Hollingbery
Answering member
Bill Esterson
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
1 April 2019
House
House of Commons

My Lords, EU Council regulation 2271/96, which protects,

“against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom”,

is commonly known as the EU blocking regulation. It seeks to protect UK and EU businesses from the harmful effects of the extraterritorial...

Member
Baroness Fairhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1803-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think there will be any difficulty on these Benches about ensuring the continuity we will require in order that there is certainty for British businesses that they can operate on the correct side of international law. The only areas that I hope the Minister will...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1804-5
House
House of Lords

I, too, am very grateful to the Minister for her very full introduction to this SI. It took us into areas new to me, such as the intersection between foreign policy and trade policy. That is an interesting issue and the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, was right to focus his...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1805-6
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their contributions in this short but useful debate. I hope I have been clear about the Government’s commitment to the continuation of these regulations. To address the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson of Balmacara, about why we are doing this, we believe...

Member
Baroness Fairhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1806-7
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister’s flow and I am grateful to her for giving way. I was trying to make a slightly different point, which is not the broader case about the JCPOA but on the British national currently held in detention in Iran for whom diplomatic efforts...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 c1807
House
House of Lords

I do not deny that other issues are at play. For the purpose of this debate, the question is whether the blocking regulation supports our approach to the JCPOA, and I think it absolutely does.

Member
Baroness Fairhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 c1807
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for giving way. On the JCPOA, the core members of the EU, including the UK, have established a financial mechanism which will effectively protect British businesses conducting business with Iran. If we are moving to having a distinct system outside that mechanism, which is protected through...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 c1807
House
House of Lords

Let me address that head-on. We are absolutely clear that we want certainty and protection for businesses. It is a difficult issue: support comes through banks, many of which choose not to engage given their dependence on their licence to operate in the US or for other commercial reasons. That...

Member
Baroness Fairhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 c1808
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Fairhead
Answering member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1802-8
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Liam Fox
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
7 March 2019
Reference
SI 2020/1660; 2019/
House
House of Lords; House of Commons