Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:USA

Legislation X
Nuclear Safeguards (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Nuclear Safeguards (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (28)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, once again I thank the Minister for his introduction. Although the regulations have been decoupled, my remarks, like those of the Minister, were in a comprehensive single form, but I am happy to bring forward one or two questions on these regulations.

These new regulations on fissionable material conform...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c652
House
House of Lords

It appears that there may be an issue with Japan. The Minister says that there is an agreement and we do not need to do anything but also that there are discussions about whether the agreement will remain operable. Could he clarify whether there are any issues at all with...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c654
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again I thank the Minister for his introduction to and explanation of the regulations before the House. These regulations were previously the responsibility of Euratom, under the Euratom treaty. Following the UK’s departure from the Euratom community, the UK will take over

this responsibility and extend the...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc657-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we move to a close on the statutory instruments that I have put before the House. I will start by reemphasising, as I think it is always important to do in debates on nuclear safeguards—which it feels I have been doing for some time—that we are talking about...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c659
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is possibly getting confused with safety and security, and thinking not only about nuclear safeguards. We are talking about only three sites, two of which are in west Cumberland—I have forgotten where the third is, but I shall write to the noble Lord. We will continue to...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be increasingly careful about what words I use when I speak in front of distinguished lawyers such as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. I will try to avoid using “only” in future. What I am saying is that we will meet our standards in relation to...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc660-1
House
House of Lords

I hope that the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, is not trying to frighten the horses; I am sure he would never want to do that. What I am saying is that we are going to meet the very high international standards of the IAEA—there were queries about this during the...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c661
House
House of Lords

I will write to the noble Lord about the precise moment, but we are moving towards that in terms of the extra staff the ONR is seeking to recruit.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c661
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, too, I suspect, is trying to frighten the horses. What I am saying is that we are meeting some very high nuclear safeguards standards—nothing to do with security or safety—and we will be there in due course. We have always been clear that we will deliver on...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c662
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for not being here at the beginning of the debate. As I understand it, these safeguards relate purely to the ability to monitor that none of the products from the nuclear industry are being used somewhere where they could make a nuclear weapon. Am I correct?

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c662
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is absolutely right and he gave a very good definition for the layman. Given his expertise, we would not dismiss him as such, but he gave a very good layman’s definition of nuclear safeguards. It is important that I make it clear again that this has nothing...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c662
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Henley
Answering member
Lord Grantchester
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc649-654
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Henley
Answering member
Lord Grantchester
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc654-662
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to move this and the next set of regulations jointly, as set out on the Order Paper. However, I received a request from the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, and I am grateful to him for giving notice that he would find it more convenient if...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc649-651
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I can deal with most of the points that have been made in the debate by noble Lords. If I miss any, perhaps on Regulation 4, we will be able to catch up on them. The noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, said that he had only...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc652-4
House
House of Lords

I am not aware of any issues. As I said, we have an NCA in place with Japan that goes back to 1998. That will remain in effect but, obviously, we want to continue discussions just in case. If I can help the noble Lord any further I will write...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c654
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these regulations set out the detailed legal framework for the United Kingdom’s new domestic civil nuclear safeguards regime after withdrawal from the European Atomic Energy Community, Euratom. The regulations are made under powers set out in the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018 and in the Energy Act 2013, as...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 cc654-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wrote only one speech to the two SIs, so I will make only one—do I get a sweetie as well? These provisions seem necessary. The Minister mentioned that NCAs had been signed with a number of countries. Does there need to be an NCA with Euratom itself...

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c651
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these are highly technical regulations and all I have to go on in seeking to scrutinise them is the debate that took place in the House of Commons on 14 January. On the issue of bilateral agreements with other nations, which are clearly vital to the handling of...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c651
House
House of Lords

I hesitate to participate in this debate, given that this is a very complex issue, but I imagine that members of the public and the industry would wish to be assured that the House is scrutinising issues of such significance from the point of view of public safety. I note...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 January 2019
Reference
795 c652
House
House of Lords