Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:Imports

Legislation X
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill 2019-21
Subject X
Service industries

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

United Kingdom Internal Market Bill 2019-21 (180)

Subject

More
Service industries (180)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As I have said repeatedly, we are absolutely committed to the Good Friday agreement, and I can give the hon. Gentleman an illustration of that in UK law on the very next clause. I can assure him that amendment 48 is simply unnecessary. The protocol guarantees that there will be...

Member
Robin Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc659-660
House
House of Commons

Committee stage (third day). Clause 11 discussed with amendments, new clauses 6 and 7, and clauses 40 to 45 and 50. Clause 11 agreed to. Amendments to clause 40 negatived on division (255 to 346, and 6 to 350 respectively). Clause 40 agreed to. Government amendment made to clause 41....

Lead member
Robin Walker
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HC); Debates on bills
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc641-760
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to amendments 52 to 60, which I tabled with my hon. and right hon. Friends. Together, these amendments seek to provide a solution to the mess that the Government have got themselves into by removing the provisions in the Bill that put our country in conflict...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc661-2
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making some absolutely crucial points, particularly about the Vienna convention. Does he accept that there is an issue here that goes well beyond the provisions in the Bill and the process we are discussing regarding the internal market? That is that it has damaged Britain’s reputation...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c662
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention. He sums up well the seriousness of the decision before us today.

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c662
House
House of Commons

Why does the hon. Gentleman not see that this Bill has been brought about by the EU’s wish to break the agreement and what he would call international law by not respecting the sovereignty of the UK, which is fundamental in the agreement, and not going ahead with the free...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c662
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Member for that intervention. I would be interested to know his views on article 184 of the withdrawal agreement, which embraces the political declaration as the basis for securing our future relationship. On the intentions of both parties, I simply cite the Government’s response to...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c662
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c703
House
House of Commons

Yes.

Member
Stephen Farry (Alliance)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c689
House
House of Commons

The Minister invites us to withdraw the amendments. This is the second occasion in the past week on which a Minister has stood at the Dispatch Box and held up an olive branch of potential amendments or provisions that will be brought forth in the Finance Bill. We have not...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c657
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Stone (Sir William Cash), who has that classic flair of oratory, as when he said that some Members may be somewhat bothered to some degree. Whether we agree or disagree with him, he raises a smile through the Chamber.

I rise...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c673
House
House of Commons

It was not accepted by the Government, but the right hon. Lady was a member of the Government who brought forward three iterations of a withdrawal agreement that did not honour that provision. That provision was not honoured in the earlier iterations of the withdrawal agreement.

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c674
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady may be right on that point, but here we are yet again, seeking to legislate domestically within the United Kingdom to right the wrongs of a negotiation that should never have advanced in the way that it did. Our Government fell into the trap of trying...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c674
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful for the question, and I know that the Government would respond by saying “Look in the Bill. It is for the Secretary of State and no one else to raise issues or notify the European Union on state aid issues.” I am concerned not just about...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c674
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right, and I mentioned the chilling effect. Arguably, if the UK Government and officialdom in Whitehall had not offered such religious observance to EU regulations over the past 40 years, this country would not have agreed to leave the European Union. We know that...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c675
House
House of Commons

I do agree. I know that the Minister went through a number of the amendments we have tabled and said, “Look, there are provisions about direct and non-direct discrimination and those still apply.” However, where a business is competing in a sector for which there are state subventions and subsidies...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc676-7
House
House of Commons

The first aspect of that question is the intended breach, and the answer is clearly no, because amendment 68 talks about “new requirements”, and if the hon. Gentleman reads the content of the amendment, he will see that. The Northern Ireland Assembly has cross-community voting mechanisms not to provide vetoes...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc677-8
House
House of Commons

I think the second-last point—the penultimate point—was right, and I agree with the hon. Member. However, on the petition of concern and the cross-community voting mechanisms, she knows the reason they are there. She does not like it when people use them for reasons that she does not agree with,...

Member
Gavin Robinson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c684
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c655
House
House of Commons

May I take the Minister back to the undertaking that he gave to his hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Sir Robert Neill)? Some of us have some misgivings about that undertaking, because this Government have shown an exceptional fondness for withdrawing the Whip from those in their...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c656
House
House of Commons