Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Imports

Legislation X
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill 2019-21
Member X
Robert Neill

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Neill, Robert (14)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

United Kingdom Internal Market Bill 2019-21 (14)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank my hon. Friend for the constructive tone that he and members of the Government have adopted in these matters. It enables some of us who otherwise would not have been able to support these clauses to proceed, on the understanding that there is a specific parliamentary lock that...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c655
House
House of Commons

This has not been the most edifying spectacle for the House of Commons over the past few days, but I hope that, at the end of the day, we can find a constructive way forward. I say that it is not edifying because, although much of the purpose of the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c678
House
House of Commons

If my hon. Friend will allow me to develop my point a little, I will of course give way to him in a moment.

Without a parliamentary lock, I do not believe that it will ever be appropriate for a sovereign Parliament to contemplate breaking an international obligation. There has to...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c678
House
House of Commons

Let me put it this way: if my hon. Friend is saying that the test is something akin to that in article 46 of the Vienna convention on the law of treaties, which permits a departure from an international obligation if the violation that causes it is

“manifest and concerned a...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc678-9
House
House of Commons

I shall make two points to the right hon. Gentleman. First, he knows my record does not indicate that I am always in terror of voting against the Whip. Secondly, if anything like that was being briefed out, I never heard it, it was never said to me and I...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c679
House
House of Commons

That does not surprise me; it is consistent with my own experience. I say gently to Opposition Members that the issues at stake are too serious to be part of what might otherwise be an understandable bit of partisan knockabout. That is not what we are talking about.

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c679
House
House of Commons

It is presumptuous, it seems to me, of the hon. Gentleman to try to suggest how any of my hon. and right hon. Friends might choose to vote, just as it would be presumptuous of me to take a view as to why any Member does or does not remain...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c680
House
House of Commons

I must press on now, and not take any further interventions for some time out of respect for others who wish to speak in this debate.

The Government now accept that they must come to the House and make their case. I think that they recognise that that case would have...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc680-1
House
House of Commons

Will the Prime Minister give way?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 c43
House
House of Commons

I never object to another promotion.

I have listened carefully to what the Prime Minister says, but does he accept that were our interlocutors in the EU to behave in such an egregious fashion, which would clearly be objectionable and unacceptable to us, there is already provision under the withdrawal agreement...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 c43
House
House of Commons

I have listened carefully to the right hon. Member’s formulation and I understand much of what he says. However, an Act passed by this House only becomes law when it comes into force. He will be right, I submit, to say that as soon as any of these provisions came...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 c52
House
House of Commons

I will endeavour to prove that the best advocacy can be the most concise.

There is a great deal in the Bill that I support and that is necessary, sensible and desirable. However, there is one important part of the Bill that creates very real difficulty for me and many others,...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 cc62-3
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend is absolutely right. That is, I think, the best approach for us to take. We should stick to the letter of those provisions, as that gives proper defence of our strategic interests. For example, there is the safeguard provision in article 16, which would...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 c63
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely with my hon. Friend, and I do hope that the Government will listen carefully to that. I want to be able to support the Bill. I cannot support it with these clauses in it as they are at the moment. I hope that we will take the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2020
Reference
680 cc63-4
House
House of Commons