Skip to main content

1-100 of 246 results for subject:Schools

Legislation X
Coronavirus Act 2020

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Coronavirus Act 2020 (246)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that the temporary provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 should not yet expire. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Sajid Javid
Answering member
Jonathan Ashworth
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc644-673
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That the temporary provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 should not yet expire.

Since we set out our road map out of lockdown in February, we have reopened the economy and lifted restrictions in four steps, carefully removing the rules that have governed our daily lives during the...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the Secretary of State about the success of our vaccination programme. Does he have any concerns about whether the third dose for those with a compromised immune system and the booster dose for everyone who has had two doses is going fast enough? Are there...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for the scrutiny that he has provided of the Coronavirus Act 2020 through the Government and in many other ways over the last few months. It has been very valuable, certainly to me. On his specific question, the third jabs, whether they are for...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for giving way and apologise to you, Mr Deputy Speaker, because I am taking part in a Westminster Hall debate, but I need to ask this important question. I understand the lockdown measures, but will my right hon. Friend ensure this time, God forbid,...

Member
Robert Halfon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

During the pandemic, my right hon. Friend has done a fantastic job of drawing everyone’s attention, rightly, to the impact that the measures—the lockdown measures in particular—have had on children, especially those in school. I hope he would agree that the plans that the Government have set out, including our...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State says that this House has had time to scrutinise the legislation, but 90 minutes every six months to scrutinise the Act really is not enough time for Parliament.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is right to point to the importance of scrutiny. Of course, it is not just the time that we have for debate now or the regular time we have had since this Act has been on the statute book. Scrutiny is also provided in other ways: for...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

No one disputes the success that some of these measures have had but there is a strong resentment—which, I have to say, I share—in many quarters about giving any Government extension to powers that are quite as blank as these are. Have the Government considered any other mechanism for allowing...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

I understand my right hon. Friend’s concerns and, rightly, many people across the House share those concerns. He will know that when the original Bill was brought to Parliament, the Government said, rightly, that any measures would be kept in place only for as long as necessary and that they...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State was not originally responsible for this. The issue that my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox) raises was first raised on 23 March 2020 when we were first putting the Coronavirus Act into law. The point made at the time was that...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Like my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox), my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) makes an important point. He will understand that now that the Act is in place, it is important that the Government act promptly and quickly at...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

The Act has always been presented on the Floor of the House as an all-or-nothing Bill; MPs never have an opportunity to change, amend or scrutinise it, so I think that the Secretary of State is just a little misleading in how he is presenting it to the House today.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Unintentionally misleading.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Thank you for that intervention, Mr Deputy Speaker. I think that I have been very clear not only about the history of the Act, but about the importance of Ministers coming forward for regular scrutiny to set out which provisions can be expired or suspended, or if expiry or suspension...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

I think the problem for the Secretary of State is how the Government acted in the past by not bringing things to the House for debate; I know that the chairman of the 1922 committee, my hon. Friend the Member for Altrincham and Sale West (Sir Graham Brady), used a...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

First, may I wish my hon. Friend a very happy birthday? He makes an important point in his valuable intervention. What I can say, which I certainly hope will reassure him, is that the Act will be regularly reviewed, that parliamentary scrutiny from all quarters is very welcome and that...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

A lot of us feel that this legislation should now just lapse, because there has been a material improvement in the situation. There are other powers should things go wrong, and this House could grant powers in the space of a few hours if there were a new and unpleasant...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

What I can tell my right hon. Friend is that there are provisions that we hope to keep in the Act, subject to the House’s will today, which are still necessary. For example, there are provisions that protect NHS capacity with respect to temporary registration of nurses and other healthcare...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend recognise that by leaving the Act intact, albeit with certain restrictions, he is leaving the opportunity for extreme measures to be taken relatively simply and with limited reference to this House, as the hon. Member for Brent Central (Dawn Butler) mentioned? A lot relates to...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

In our response to the pandemic, we have set out clearly our plan for the autumn and winter; I have certainly done so in the House. We certainly expect more pressure as we head into winter. We have been very open about that; it is why the covid vaccination booster...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

Would my right hon. Friend go a little further? As a medical support worker, I can tell him that there has been very little effort to follow through on a programme

begun last year to encourage people to return to being patient-facing. They need to remain engaged; the Act is...

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right to draw attention to that point. We need to keep working on it, but it might be helpful to know that under section 2 of the Act, the Nursing and Midwifery Council has been able to register temporarily some 14,000 nurses, midwives and nursing...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
Answer corrected on 22 October 2021 at 701 cc7-8MC.
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c653
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State has been extolling the virtues of parliamentary scrutiny, which, as many right hon. and hon. Members have stated, has been sadly lacking of this Act and in its renewal debates. Will he give us a cast-iron guarantee that should he decide to bring forward vaccine passports,...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c653
House
House of Commons

I think that the Government have already been clear that should we try to bring forward what the hon. Lady calls vaccine passports, it would be a decision for the House and it would be a vote. If that happened, we would have to justify it to the House.

In addition,...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c653
House
House of Commons

I welcome the lifting of the more draconian measures in the Coronavirus Act, including section 52 and schedule 22, which gave significant and unprecedented powers to the

police relating to events, gatherings and premises, with no protections for the safeguarding of freedom of expression. Most of those powers are mirrored...

Member
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c653
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for what she has said, but I think the Government have already set out clearly the provisions that they intend to expire or suspend, subject to the will of the House today, and explained why they have focused on those provisions. I can also inform...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c654
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend explain in detail which of the measures that the Government seek to retain could not be implemented alternatively by means of the Civil Contingencies Act or the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984?

Member
Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c654
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will know that there are numerous measures that the Government are planning to retain. To do proper justice to his question, I would have to go through them one by one and try to link them with every single Act, but I should be happy to meet...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c654
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c654
House
House of Commons

I think I have given the hon. Lady enough opportunities to intervene.

We have come so far and achieved so much as a country because of the sacrifices of the British people and the dedication of our fantastic public servants. We are learning to live with the virus, so we can...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c654
House
House of Commons

We do not oppose the renewal of the Act and we will not oppose its renewal in the Division Lobby, but I do have huge sympathy with the Members who have raised

concerns about the way in which the Act is scrutinised and asked questions about whether there are alternative...

Member
Jonathan Ashworth (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc654-5
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is making a powerful argument. Given what he has said, would it not be a good idea for the Opposition to vote against the motion and perhaps defeat the Government, so that the correct procedures could be in place tomorrow?

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c655
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman tempts me. I can understand that if the Act fell, there would be time for alternative provisions to be put in place, but I am afraid I do not have confidence in the continuation of this particular Treasury, which is keen to find savings in the public...

Member
Jonathan Ashworth (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c655
House
House of Commons

I always listen to the right hon. Gentleman’s comments with the greatest of interest. He is concerned that there is not sufficient scrutiny. Will he compare and contrast the attendance in this short debate on the Government Benches with that on the Labour Benches? I count three of his Back-Bench...

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c656
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is better than that, with respect. He is very experienced, and he knows full well that right hon. and hon. Members have various responsibilities as Members of Parliament. Come on! That was akin to those ridiculous tweets that we sometimes see going around, saying that an...

Member
Jonathan Ashworth (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c656
House
House of Commons

I have a great deal of sympathy with what the right hon. Gentleman has just said, but there is an underlying point. On many occasions since March 2020, the Opposition have absented themselves from providing effective voting opposition to measures that the Government have proposed, often affecting the rights and...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c656
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman knows full well that if the Government wanted to bring forward a separate Bill to pay statutory sick pay from day one—and to increase the level of statutory sick pay, which is not currently at a satisfactory level—that would of course have our support. However, that would...

Member
Jonathan Ashworth (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc656-8
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c657
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I will, of course, obey your strictures on time.

I welcome what the Secretary of State has done in not continuing with some of the most offensive and egregious provisions in the Act, particularly the one enabling almost indefinite detention. I have looked very carefully at...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c659
House
House of Commons

May I ask my right hon. Friend to hesitate in his laudatory comments about the Opposition Front Benchers? One problem we have is that we cannot amend the provisions. The deal they did not strike back on 23 March 2020, and that they should have, was that this should have...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c659
House
House of Commons

That is exactly right. It is for that reason that if there were a Division I would not be voting for this legislation, because I do not think it comes with enough parliamentary scrutiny—the sort of scrutiny that there is if we use the Civil Contingencies Act 2004.

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c659
House
House of Commons

Would it not also help the Government’s case if they gave us more detail on which of these measures actually worked and did some good? We need more post-result audits so that we can have more confidence in some of these measures.

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c660
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend makes a good point, which would be worth following up.

Conscious of your strictures, Madam Deputy Speaker, let me make a couple of final points. On the issue raised by the hon. Member for Twickenham (Munira Wilson) on vaccine passports, the Secretary of State gave half of...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c660
House
House of Commons

I had a profound sense of déjà vu in preparing for today’s debate, although it is hard to believe it is six months since we last considered this and 18 months since our nations went into lockdown, during which period I have probably said everything on this subject before. Let...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c660
House
House of Commons

When the hon. Gentleman says vaccination, I hope he also means vaccination against seasonal flu, which is currently at the front of my mind as this morning I had my jab in the Attlee Room in Portcullis House. Seasonal flu will potentially cause more of a problem this winter than...

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c661
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his comments, and I do indeed agree. I wonder whether he has seen an advance copy of my notes, because I was coming to that very point. We are still witnessing too many infections and I worry that, when they are combined with...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c661
House
House of Commons

Scotland and Wales have national ID cards, and if plan B is triggered in England, there is a possibility that we will have an ID card in England, too. Does the hon. Gentleman feel it would have been better to have a whole-United Kingdom covid ID card, so that each...

Member
Chris Green (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c661
House
House of Commons

I should point that they are not ID cards but vaccine certificates. As I have said, we respect the differences, and although we welcome a four-nations approach we will move differently if things move at different paces.

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c661
House
House of Commons

On the hon. Gentleman’s stricture about the mask mandate— the requirement on which he wishes us to follow Scotland—the wearing of masks does not seem to have reduced the rate of infection in Scotland, which is somewhat higher than it is in England, does it?

Member
Desmond Swayne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c661
House
House of Commons

I am an enthusiastic mask wearer for one simple reason that I think helps us all: it sends a very strong message to people that the virus has not gone away. I therefore encourage people to wear a mask, which also has benefits in the reduction of transmission.

The UK Government...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc661-2
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c662
House
House of Commons

We are in a profoundly different place from where we were 19 months ago when we entered the pandemic and went through a series of lockdowns. The medicines that doctors use and prescribe and the procedures that are in place are all profoundly improved. The vaccination programme has been a...

Member
Chris Green (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc663-4
House
House of Commons

Today really feels like groundhog day. The Government are again pushing through the Coronavirus Act with no scrutiny from Parliament. I do not know what it is about this authoritarian Act that the Government love to push through. Some 18 months ago, the Bill was nodded through—understandably, in a way,...

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc664-5
House
House of Commons

I agree with every word of what the hon. Member for Brent Central (Dawn Butler) said. She made the point that we took the Bill through the House in one day and it was in fact unnecessary because the power was already replicated in the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 and...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc665-6
House
House of Commons

I agree with the comments of the right hon. Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) and the hon. Member for Brent Central (Dawn Butler).

Given the sweeping and draconian powers that this Government granted themselves under the cover of an emergency, Liberal Democrats only very reluctantly supported this unprecedented legislation...

Member
Munira Wilson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc666-7
House
House of Commons

I refer to the declarations I have made relating to the Covid Recovery Group. When we rammed this Act of Parliament through, I stood over there in Committee and said it would bring forward a dystopian society. I had no idea then of just how dystopian it would be. I...

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc667-8
House
House of Commons

We need to have a frank and honest discussion about where we are on covid. It is now clear that the Government’s covid strategy is again going badly wrong with fatal consequences.

We need to be clear that our country currently has the world’s second highest number of new cases and...

Member
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc668-9
House
House of Commons

I begin by expressing my gratitude to all the healthcare workers in my constituency and across the rest of the UK. They have had an incredibly hard shift and they have coped with it admirably.

I do not want to rehash comments that have already been made about the Government’s avoidance...

Member
Neale Hanvey (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c669
House
House of Commons

I will be very quick. I am not sure where I stand on vaccine passports, but I do know where I stand on the fact that one of my constituents, who was vaccinated in England and then vaccinated in Scotland, cannot go to university courses because the four nations strategy...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c669
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for making that point, which I was not aware of until now, but I am certainly not the person to speak to in defence of

vaccine passports. Quite frankly, I really think they are a gimmick and a sticking plaster. I would say that we...

Member
Neale Hanvey (Alba Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc669-670
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to be closing this debate, and I thank hon. Members from all across the House for their contributions today. It is clear from the speeches we have heard—and, indeed, from the fact that the House can meet at full capacity once again—that we have made so...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c670
House
House of Commons

May I invite my hon. Friend to remind the House and the country that the instincts of the Government sitting behind this Act were benign and in support of public health, not malign and vindictive and trying to erode liberties? These were unprecedented times that required emergency action. Those actions...

Member
Simon Hoare (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c670
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention. The Government were acting in very difficult times and had to take unprecedented measures, as he rightly said.

The Secretary of State explained the provisions in detail in his opening statement, so I will not repeat those that we will be expiring but...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc670-1
House
House of Commons

I rise to repeat the point I made to the hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Neale Hanvey). It would be very good if the NHSs in all four parts of the kingdom were to get together and ensure that those who have had one vaccination in one part of...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c671
House
House of Commons

I reassure my right hon. Friend that there are ongoing talks across all the devolved nations and the interoperability of the devices are being looked into; work is under way on that.

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c671
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend also scrutinise the Bill, as a number of colleagues have mentioned this afternoon, to find those bits that were inserted as expedients but probably need to be refined a little and perhaps given a different statutory basis, such as the certificates in section 19, which for...

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c671
House
House of Commons

Of course we keep every aspect of the Act under review and will continue to do so.

Members have made a number of compelling points and I would like to address them and respond to some of the questions raised. The shadow spokesman raised the issue of vaccinations and I am...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc671-2
House
House of Commons

Before my hon. Friend moves on, may I press her a little further? She rightly says that the Government recognise the importance of parliamentary scrutiny. That is welcome, but my question was very specific. The Secretary of State committed to the House’s having to make the decision about vaccine passports,...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c672
House
House of Commons

Covid certification will be brought in under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, which, as my right hon. Friend is aware, allows for emergency measures. We will do our utmost to bring forward the vote in Parliament before any enactment of the need for covid certification.

I return to...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c672
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend share my constituents’ perplexity and confusion that the Government think it is suitable to have compulsory vaccination in care home settings—that has been their intention for many weeks—yet they are still confused or undecided as to whether that is equally relevant in the NHS? Carers are...

Member
Chris Green (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c672
House
House of Commons

I reiterate that we are consulting at the moment for the NHS and other social care settings, and we are not moving the dates that we have already set for vaccination as a condition of deployment in care homes.

The hon. Members for Brent Central (Dawn Butler) and for Twickenham (Munira...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c672
House
House of Commons

I wonder whether the Minister will also consider the fines under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act and whether there will be an appeal mechanism. Will she push for that, please?

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c672
House
House of Commons

I will take the hon. Lady’s comments on board. The progress that has been made with regard to unlawful convictions has been really helpful.

We have come so far in our fight, but we still have a long way to go. This pandemic is not yet over, and the steps we...

Member
Maggie Throup (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c673
House
House of Commons

No!

Member
Desmond Swayne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c673
House
House of Commons

The just shall live by faith.

Member
Desmond Swayne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c673
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will bring forward proposals to end the provisions in section 38 and Schedule 17 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 as covid-19 restrictions are lifted to make it the duty of schools to secure SEND provision for disabled children and young...

Asked by
Marsha De Cordova (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2021
Reference
174260
House
House of Commons

MPs will debate E-petitions 313310, 557167, 563904, 566718 and 567492, relating to the Government’s Spring 2021 Covid-19 roadmap, on 22 March 2021 at 6.15pm in Westminster Hall. This House of Commons Library briefing provides background information to the debate.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
19 March 2021
Reference
CDP-2021-0051

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. The UK Government need to get a grip and work with the other Governments and local councils around the United Kingdom on an equal basis.

Right at the start of the pandemic, the World Health Organisation said that we should “test, test, test”, and...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc396-7
House
House of Commons

I said on Monday that I was actually quite pleased with the app, and I wonder whether the hon. Gentleman is pleased with the app and whether he has installed it and switched it on.

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c397
House
House of Commons

Yes, I have indeed installed the app. It has taken a significant time and a significant amount of wasted money to actually appear, but it has finally appeared and I would encourage all hon. and right hon. Members to download it.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c397
House
House of Commons

I would like to point out to the hon. Member for Wycombe (Mr Baker) that the app actually works better in Wales, because all the tests can be properly downloaded in Wales, unlike in England. And while my hon. Friend the Member for Torfaen (Nick Thomas-Symonds) is at it, can...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c397
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. The lesson with promises from this Government is that we always need them in writing, and even then they are not necessarily delivered.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c397
House
House of Commons

He will be able to read it in Hansard in the morning.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c397
House
House of Commons

Moving swiftly on.

In England, the number of tests, the availability of tests and the turnaround time simply are not good enough. So dire is the situation that the Prime Minister is arguing with the Health Secretary over whether testing even matters. The Health Secretary has said that

“finding where the people...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc397-9
House
House of Commons

I hope my hon. Friend agrees that the way the Secretary of State has approached this matter today is disappointing. Many of us sit on Select Committees and have scrutinised the way in which this Act has come forward, and are willing to spend more time doing that properly. That...

Member
Karin Smyth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c399
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. She saves me from coming to another part of my speech. Quality scrutiny is available across the House on a cross-party basis, and we have had no credible explanation for why this debate is limited to 90 minutes.

The rights that I have referred to,...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc399-400
House
House of Commons

I agree that 141 unlawful prosecutions—100% unlawful prosecutions —is completely unacceptable. In Scotland, the police have not been using the powers in schedule 21, so we have not had the same problem. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that we need fewer widely drawn powers, and that schedule 21 needs to...

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c400
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Lady is absolutely right. The problem comes with “potentially infected persons”. It is a very poorly drafted schedule, and that is why we are seeing these consequences. I urge the Health Secretary again to look at it.

As we tighten restrictions and ask for more sacrifices from...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc400-1
House
House of Commons

Mr Speaker, may I begin by thanking you? Although you gave your reasons earlier for not selecting the amendments in my name and that of 80 other colleagues across the House, you also made your expectations of Government crystal clear. No one could doubt your commitment to upholding the Standing...

Member
Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c401
House
House of Commons

Can the hon. Gentleman tell us what this new procedure is?

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c402
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is an expert on procedure, and he will soon get to grips with it. It is the made affirmative procedure, which entails the setting of a commencement date in the future for measures, which will allow for a debate and vote to take place in advance of...

Member
Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c402
House
House of Commons

But the Government decide.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c402
House
House of Commons

These things will be brought forward. We have had the assurance, and we will hold the Government to it. The hon. Gentleman will see it very soon.

I will close by thanking those Members across the House who, by supporting my amendment publicly or privately, have helped to achieve what I...

Member
Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c402
House
House of Commons

I regret the fact that this is only a 90-minute debate. The Government should have ensured that a more appropriate amount of time was given. In that context, I will not do what I normally do; I apologise to Members, but because of time, I will not be taking interventions....

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc402-4
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c404
House
House of Commons

I can see the Secretary of State frowning, but, Secretary of State, that is the reality. People are going to lose their jobs and their livelihoods, and this Government are not prepared to do what they promised— to get their arms around those who were going to be affected.

The Tories...

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c404
House
House of Commons

You’re obsessed by it.

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c405
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman should reflect on the damage that the 1980s did to communities. I used to live in Lanarkshire, where the steel and coal industries were devastated, and many of those communities have never recovered from the devastation that was visited upon them by Thatcher and her Government...

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 c405
House
House of Commons

I will support the Government today because, although I fully understand the concerns about parliamentary scrutiny eloquently expressed by my hon. Friend the Member for Altrincham and Sale West (Sir Graham Brady), the biggest threat that we face as a country is not the erosion of liberty but the explosion...

Member
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
681 cc405-6
House
House of Commons