Skip to main content

1-20 of 246 results for subject:Schools

Legislation X
Coronavirus Act 2020

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Coronavirus Act 2020 (246)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that the temporary provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 should not yet expire. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Sajid Javid
Answering member
Jonathan Ashworth
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 cc644-673
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That the temporary provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 should not yet expire.

Since we set out our road map out of lockdown in February, we have reopened the economy and lifted restrictions in four steps, carefully removing the rules that have governed our daily lives during the...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the Secretary of State about the success of our vaccination programme. Does he have any concerns about whether the third dose for those with a compromised immune system and the booster dose for everyone who has had two doses is going fast enough? Are there...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for the scrutiny that he has provided of the Coronavirus Act 2020 through the Government and in many other ways over the last few months. It has been very valuable, certainly to me. On his specific question, the third jabs, whether they are for...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c649
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for giving way and apologise to you, Mr Deputy Speaker, because I am taking part in a Westminster Hall debate, but I need to ask this important question. I understand the lockdown measures, but will my right hon. Friend ensure this time, God forbid,...

Member
Robert Halfon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

During the pandemic, my right hon. Friend has done a fantastic job of drawing everyone’s attention, rightly, to the impact that the measures—the lockdown measures in particular—have had on children, especially those in school. I hope he would agree that the plans that the Government have set out, including our...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State says that this House has had time to scrutinise the legislation, but 90 minutes every six months to scrutinise the Act really is not enough time for Parliament.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is right to point to the importance of scrutiny. Of course, it is not just the time that we have for debate now or the regular time we have had since this Act has been on the statute book. Scrutiny is also provided in other ways: for...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

No one disputes the success that some of these measures have had but there is a strong resentment—which, I have to say, I share—in many quarters about giving any Government extension to powers that are quite as blank as these are. Have the Government considered any other mechanism for allowing...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

I understand my right hon. Friend’s concerns and, rightly, many people across the House share those concerns. He will know that when the original Bill was brought to Parliament, the Government said, rightly, that any measures would be kept in place only for as long as necessary and that they...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c650
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State was not originally responsible for this. The issue that my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox) raises was first raised on 23 March 2020 when we were first putting the Coronavirus Act into law. The point made at the time was that...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Like my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox), my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) makes an important point. He will understand that now that the Act is in place, it is important that the Government act promptly and quickly at...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

The Act has always been presented on the Floor of the House as an all-or-nothing Bill; MPs never have an opportunity to change, amend or scrutinise it, so I think that the Secretary of State is just a little misleading in how he is presenting it to the House today.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Unintentionally misleading.

Member
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

Thank you for that intervention, Mr Deputy Speaker. I think that I have been very clear not only about the history of the Act, but about the importance of Ministers coming forward for regular scrutiny to set out which provisions can be expired or suspended, or if expiry or suspension...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

I think the problem for the Secretary of State is how the Government acted in the past by not bringing things to the House for debate; I know that the chairman of the 1922 committee, my hon. Friend the Member for Altrincham and Sale West (Sir Graham Brady), used a...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c651
House
House of Commons

First, may I wish my hon. Friend a very happy birthday? He makes an important point in his valuable intervention. What I can say, which I certainly hope will reassure him, is that the Act will be regularly reviewed, that parliamentary scrutiny from all quarters is very welcome and that...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

A lot of us feel that this legislation should now just lapse, because there has been a material improvement in the situation. There are other powers should things go wrong, and this House could grant powers in the space of a few hours if there were a new and unpleasant...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

What I can tell my right hon. Friend is that there are provisions that we hope to keep in the Act, subject to the House’s will today, which are still necessary. For example, there are provisions that protect NHS capacity with respect to temporary registration of nurses and other healthcare...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend recognise that by leaving the Act intact, albeit with certain restrictions, he is leaving the opportunity for extreme measures to be taken relatively simply and with limited reference to this House, as the hon. Member for Brent Central (Dawn Butler) mentioned? A lot relates to...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2021
Reference
701 c652
House
House of Commons