Skip to main content

1-20 of 161 results for subject:Staffordshire

Legislation X
High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill 2017-19 to 2019-21

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I rise to support the Bill and all the Lords amendments. I thank the Minister for his acceptance of Labour

amendments, particularly Lords amendment 3, and for his acknowledgement that the Bill did not go far enough to ensure that local voices were heard. This progress would not have been...

Member
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc903-5
House
House of Commons

There is less justification for this grossly overpriced project than there was when Labour first proposed it. It is the most expensive way to destroy lives and homes, and tear apart the environment. It also ensures that highly paid HS2 personnel continue to bulldoze through this unpopular project. Public polls...

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc905-6
House
House of Commons

To follow on from the right hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham (Dame Cheryl Gillan), I find it slightly bizarre that at a time when rail travel has been upended and changed dramatically, there was no mention of that in the Minister’s comments. Keynes said, “When the facts change, I...

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc906-7
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to speak in the debate. I begin by thanking the noble Lord Rosser for taking up the cause of my constituents in the village of Woore, a small village where Cheshire, Staffordshire and Shropshire meet; Woore actually means boundary. It comprises a strip of about...

Member
Owen Paterson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c907
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the Minister has agreed to accept the amendments from the House of Lords, particularly Lords amendment 3,

which relates to consultation for the people of Staffordshire, Shropshire and Cheshire, who are affected most grievously by this monstrous white elephant, which has cost so much—it has spiralled...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc907-8
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Stone (Sir William Cash). I wish to speak to Lords amendment 2, which will ensure regular reporting on works around ancient woodlands and which, I understand, has been accepted by the Government. However, I am not entirely happy, because this...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc908-9
House
House of Commons

The case for HS2 before the pandemic hit was made on the basis of the need to expand capacity. I always argued that there was a quicker and cheaper solution for capacity, and that was to digitalise signalling, introduce more short sections of bypass track and improve engineering around the...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc909-910
House
House of Commons

I wish to speak to Lords amendment 3, which requires the Secretary of State to consult Staffordshire residents, and Lords amendment 2, regarding the protection of ancient woodlands, in order to represent my constituents who have endured the spectre of HS2 for many years.

From speaking to residents since I have...

Member
Theo Clarke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc910-1
House
House of Commons

I wish to speak to Lords amendment 3, which I am delighted the Government are supporting. I also wish to outline why it is so important. HS2 will cut straight through Staffordshire, and we cannot be subject to all the pain without any gain. I am pleased that the Government...

Member
Jack Brereton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc911-2
House
House of Commons

I am speaking in support of Lords amendment 3, which I am glad the Minister has indicated he will accept. I thank him for the open and proactive way that he has engaged with me and other Members of the House. HS2 represents a huge opportunity, not just for Crewe,...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc912-3
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow so many hon. Friends and constituency neighbours, such as my hon. Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Dr Mullan). I, too, support Lords amendment 3 and welcome the consultation that the Government have agreed to with people in Staffordshire, Shropshire and Cheshire. The...

Member
Aaron Bell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc913-4
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the contributions to this debate from many Members. The amendments that we are discussing are very narrow, and many of the contributions we heard were not within the remit of the debate. However, I appreciate the sincerely held views of all who have spoken today. I...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc914-5
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c915
House
House of Commons

In case it pre-empts a point that the right hon. Gentleman is about to make, I will just add that the revised business case will be published when we make an investment decision. While I cannot come out with a revised business case today, before the Treasury commits, there will...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c915
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that helpful reply. Are the Government undertaking an assessment of whether patterns of travel have structurally changed or whether this is just a temporary blip? If patterns of travel have changed, the whole basis of this scheme may have done as well.

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c915
House
House of Commons

We can all see that patterns of travel have changed in the short term, but we are not sure how long that will last. The uncertain end of covid-19—we will get through this, but we are not sure when—means that it is quite hard to predict how long the impact...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c915
House
House of Commons

Is one of the main drivers not peak-time capacity and daytime capacity? Inter-city travel is very much driven by business travel. We have seen how remote conferencing—Zoom we call it, but there are all

the other companies as well—has changed the ways in which people are undertaking those meetings. Might...

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c915
House
House of Commons

This matter really needs its own debate—I am sure it will get one—where we can go through these things in some depth. What I will say is that if we look at the aspirational growth plans of some of the cities we intend to connect, we see that Leeds, for...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc916-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 c902
House
House of Commons

Let me say at the outset that the majority of these amendments are clarifications, corrections and updated references. When a Bill has had such a lengthy passage through these Houses as this one, it is perhaps amazing that there are so few amendments that need to be made. Let me...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
687 cc902-3
House
House of Commons