Skip to main content

1-20 of 86 results for subject:Patients

Legislation X
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Subject X
Direct payments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Health Bill (HL) 2008-09 (86)

Subject

More
Direct payments (86)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 April 2009
Reference
DEP2009-1539
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
DEP2009-1537
House
House of Lords

I shall give an example of what happened to me. I cannot leave my home in Yorkshire without my helpers. One of my helpers is pregnant, which causes problems for the disabled person. There are certain things that the helper cannot do, such as helping someone into bed, out of...

Member
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c235GC
House
House of Lords

These amendments deal with the provision of information, protection and support for recipients of direct payments for healthcare and the protection of staff providing services under a direct payment. I will address the amendments in turn, starting with those that relate particularly to information, advice, advocacy and support. Amendment 52...

Member
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c235-9GC
House
House of Lords

I shall speak briefly to Amendments 55 and 56. An issue flagged up earlier this afternoon was what happens when the amount of a direct payment runs out? If someone is in receipt of a direct payment and then discovers that it is insufficient to pay for the healthcare that...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c240-1GC
House
House of Lords

This relates to the point that I was making before about what happens when the budget goes over. It does; it has happened with me.

Member
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c242GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his kind and full response. I hoped that we might have got to it quicker, but I realise that he has a lot on his plate. The issue will not go away. It will come back, and we will return to it at another time....

Member
Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c256GC
House
House of Lords

Might I raise an issue about which the Minister may not be aware? At the beginning of the National Health Service—and I remember it well because I was practising medicine before it came in—it was possible for individuals to purchase what was known as an amenity bed while continuing to...

Member
Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c256GC
House
House of Lords

I start by putting firmly on the record that the Government are committed to the NHS as a service based on clinical need and not the ability to pay—and the new NHS Constitution, as we debated last Monday, enshrines that principle. Our position is clear on the general question of...

Member
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c255-6GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister replies, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours for entering the debate. I have never heard the argument about the birth certificate before. It is a very interesting one. I was born on the north-west Indian frontier and have a birth certificate that is very strange indeed....

Member
Baroness Cumberlege (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c215-6GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 52 and the other amendments in this group are in large part about information and support and the training that goes with that. I have enormous sympathy with the considerations that have prompted Amendments 63A and 69B, tabled by the noble Baronesses, Lady Wilkins and Lady Campbell, and I...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c227-8GC
House
House of Lords

I shall speak to two amendments: Amendment 57, which I tabled, and Amendment 54. In speaking to Amendment 57, I should point out that this comes from the UNISON stable. As I have said before, I have a non-pecuniary relationship with UNISON. Its concern should be heard during a Bill’s...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c229-32GC
House
House of Lords

I have one more question. What happens if one PCT gives a direct payment to one patient and the next PCT denies it to an absolutely identical patient? Is there a right of appeal?

Member
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c226GC
House
House of Lords

I will bring this discussion back. We are running pilots across the country, and it is for the PCTs to submit innovative ideas that are locally worked through with all the stakeholders at a local level: patient groups, advocacy groups, the voluntary sector and others. They will bring us the...

Member
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c226GC
House
House of Lords

I have a question, too. Will drug and alcohol services be included in direct payments? So many people are sitting in prison now and not getting the right treatment, because it comes from another budget and health or social services simply do not want to pay for it. I asked...

Member
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c219GC
House
House of Lords

I will speak as briefly as I can in support of the thrust of Amendment 58 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Cumberlege. In doing so, I declare an interest as a trustee of the Michael Sieff Foundation, a child welfare organisation, and as a trustee of TACT,...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c219-20GC
House
House of Lords

Can I take my noble friend back to maternity services? Suppose that it can be shown that a maternity unit’s existence is threatened by the introduction of these payments in the case of maternity services. Does my noble friend believe that that should be taken into account, remembering that page...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c223GC
House
House of Lords

Going back to the speech made by the noble Baroness, Lady Campbell, on Second Reading, which was read extensively by people outside the House, will my noble friend say whether the £200 mattress would fall within the direct payment budget? The £200 mattress became the symbol of that debate in...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c224GC
House
House of Lords

I have coupled my name with the amendment tabled by my noble friend Lord Howe, and I declare an interest as executive director of Cumberlege Connections and patron of Independent Midwives UK. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Darzi, and the noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, for the briefing meeting that...

Member
Baroness Cumberlege (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c208-11GC
House
House of Lords

We now come to a series of groups of amendments which are all about a crucial part of the Bill; namely the provisions to enable direct payments to be made in respect of healthcare. Many of those amendments stand in my name, and I offer no apology for having tabled...

Member
Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c203-6GC
House
House of Lords