Skip to main content

1-20 of 504 results for subject:Misuse

Legislation X
Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06 (504)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 38 2006

Violent Crime Reduction Bill. Consideration of Commons reason. Commons reason considered and Lords amendment not insisted on.

Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c165-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, bearing in mind the recent question asked by my noble friend Lady O’Cathain of the Chairman of Committees, the House might perhaps just need a slight flavour of the matter that we are debating. When I pressed this to a Division on 17 May, I was concerned about...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c165-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we supported the noble Baroness when she moved her amendment in May. Now that she is no longer pressing it, of course we will follow in her footsteps. Why do we not get rid of the word ““stakeholder”” altogether? In our deliberations on this Bill, the noble Lord...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c166
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Motion A, that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 27, to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason 27A. By way of introduction, let me say that this is the Bill’s one small pebble, as the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c165
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend, I beg to move that the Commons reason be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to HL Bill 41 as first printed for the Lords.] 27: Clause 13, page 12, line 43,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c165
House
House of Lords

As was the case with the last clutch of Lords amendments, although this grouping has the broad heading of ““Miscellaneous and minor amendments””, some of the amendments in it deal with important matters. Lords amendments Nos. 67 to 68 and 105 to 110 simply close loopholes in the legislation on...

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c61-2
House
House of Commons

First, on the broad issue of football banning orders, it would be remiss not to put on record the fact that they have been hugely successful, not least in managing the behaviour of English fans at the World cup in Germany in the summer. It is therefore appropriate to tweak...

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c64-5
House
House of Commons

Although these amendments are gathered under the general heading of ““Weapons etc.””, they have some important separate dimensions. I will therefore spend a little time discussing the distinct groups of amendments covered by the heading. Amendments Nos. 33 to 38 relate to the new offence of using someone to mind...

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c49
House
House of Commons

Proposed new section 96B(10), which would be inserted by Lords amendment No. 69, says:"““‘senior police officer’ means a constable of the rank of superintendent or above.””" Is there a reason for choosing superintendent, or could many police forces consider a chief inspector, or a detective chief inspector, a ““senior police...

Member
Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c62
House
House of Commons

I welcome Lords amendment No. 69, and I am slightly at odds with my hon. Friend the Member for Arundel and South Downs (Nick Herbert). The Lords amendment is familiar, because in many ways it resembles a private Member’s Bill that I introduced, as well as amendments that I tabled...

Member
Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c63-4
House
House of Commons

I agree with the Minister that the amendments are more than just technical, and some of them are on important issues. I shall highlight just four. First, I should mention Lords amendments Nos. 67 and 68 on ticket touting. It was anomalous that the ticket-touting legislation did not apply to...

Member
Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c62-3
House
House of Commons

That is a fair point. My understanding is that the provision gives an appropriate definition of ““senior police officer”” that is readily accepted across the piece in policing matters, and in legislation. If there is any other specific reason for defining the term in that way, I will come back...

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c62
House
House of Commons

That decision was clearly nonsense, and I would expect everyone on either side of the Chamber to regard it as such. The law is brought into disrepute by such cases. I ask the Minister to ensure that, when people are caught carrying knives, they appear before a judge or magistrate,...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c60
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend mentions the subject of knives in school. He probably knows of the case in which Greenwich council was forced to pay £11,000 to a boy who was expelled for taking a knife to school. The council was ordered to pay his mother compensation because of the anxiety...

Member
Humfrey Malins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c60
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c61
House
House of Commons

First, I thank the hon. Member for Arundel and South Downs (Nick Herbert) for his full and generous welcome for the amendments. I shall try to ignore what were, in general, rather flaccid and petty attempts at making party political points. They were entirely unnecessary, given that the House broadly...

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c60-1
House
House of Commons

As one who was relieved of his walkman 25 years ago by someone claiming to have a knife, this issue is rather close to my heart. He did not actually show me the knife, but I was not going to hang around to see it, so I passed over my...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c59
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the Government on introducing the measures, particularly those concerning the carrying of knives, but like my hon. Friend the Member for Woking (Mr. Malins), I suspect that we will have to revisit and increase the maximum sentence for carrying a knife in due course. I want to make...

Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c59
House
House of Commons

I certainly did see that survey, and much of the problem stems from the fear of what might happen if we do intervene. There have been some well-publicised cases in the past few months of young men and others with a community-minded spirit challenging local youths and ending up dead....

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
451 c59-60
House
House of Commons