Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Reviews

Legislation X
Finance Bill 2012-13 to 2013-14

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Finance Bill 2012-13 to 2013-14 (14)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

The Opposition’s new clause 10 challenges the Chancellor to publish, within six months of Royal Assent, a review of the impact of last week’s spending review announcements on tax receipts. Should the Government agree to undertake such a review,...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2013
Reference
565 c807
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Hon. Members might not have spotted the announcement on this matter in the Chancellor’s Budget in March. It is a little-noticed provision that was buried on page 64 of the Red Book in the table that sets out whether...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2013
Reference
565 cc861-2
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 57, page 15, line 16, at end insert—

‘(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 13 of Schedule 18, that Schedule shall come into force after the

Chancellor has conducted, and placed in the House of Commons Library, a review of the operation of the interaction of REITs...

Member
Cathy Jamieson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2013
Reference
565 cc826-831
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 1, page 1, line 7, at end add—

‘(1) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall, within three months of the passing of this Act, publish a report on the additional rate of income tax.

(2) This report shall review the impact upon Exchequer receipts of setting the...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c506
House
House of Commons

I said that the Budget needed to be about priorities and that we need to look now at how to help people struggling on the lowest incomes and ensure that those with the broadest shoulders bear the greatest burden. In government, Labour took steps to ensure that its pension reliefs...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc508-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is chuntering from a sedentary position. Does he wish to intervene?

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

I suggest that the hon. Gentleman is quoting selectively in leaving out the fact that the greatest impact is on the bottom decile of earners. When you take the cuts and changes overall, those at the bottom bear the greatest proportional brunt.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

It is the hon. Gentleman’s own Chancellor who is quoting selectively from the figures. I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention.

The facts are clear, and beyond the facts is the reality facing households up and down the country. We see people from those households coming into our constituency surgeries...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

Even some mild empathy from the Chancellor for those bearing the brunt of his catastrophically failing economic plan would be welcome to people up and down the country, who feel that he is extremely out of touch with the reality that they face.

To put the issue into context for Government...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc510-1
House
House of Commons

I do not follow the hon. Gentleman’s logic that that justifies a non-assessment at this stage. He knows very well that there has been a huge intake from the 50p tax rate which this Government fail to acknowledge. He also knows that we suffered a catastrophic international financial crisis in...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c511
House
House of Commons

HMRC’s report, “The Exchequer effect of the 50 per cent additional rate of income tax”, but I will go into that in more detail in due course.

The Prime Minister went on record and said in this Chamber that the 50p tax rate was cut because it did not raise any...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc511-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely strong point, and one that I have made repeatedly. This might seem like small change to the Chancellor, but it could make a very big difference to some of the people affected by his failing economic plan.

I am sure, given the concerns recently expressed...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c512
House
House of Commons

We have made it perfectly clear from day one that we do not support the cut to the 50p rate now, and we call on the Government to analyse the impact of the introduction and premature removal of the 50p rate. When we come to publish our next manifesto, we...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc512-3
House
House of Commons

Okay. I am pleased that that has been clarified for the record. Other hon. Members will feel the same.

Lord Oakeshott said:

“In such hard times, we should never have rolled over when the Tories wanted to cut the 50p rate unless we got a mansion tax in return. At the next...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc513-4
House
House of Commons