Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Self-assessment

Legislation X
Finance Bill 2007-08
Member X
David Gauke

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. New clause 1 is an attempt to rectify a small but aggravating injustice in the stamp duty land tax. It is an injustice against the thousands of people who own the leasehold of their property and wish to...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c208-10
House
House of Commons

In the court case, or the special commissioner's case, the fact that section 4A had not been brought into effect meant that it came down to intention. As the hon. Gentleman says, it has not been brought into effect because of the practical difficulties that the Government have identified.

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c211
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment No. 1A, page 73, line 12, at end insert—

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c220
House
House of Commons

I thank the Exchequer Secretary for her thanks to me and for an informative answer, which set out the problem. I am not sure whether that was previously on the record, so it is helpful for the Committee to have a better understanding of the problem. I did not realise...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c216
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend, who is a doughty defender of the rights of Parliament, makes another good point. His comment brings together the first and second parts of my argument, the first being that there seems to have been a rush to get the legislation in place this year, and the...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c225
House
House of Commons

Yes, as I said earlier, the Government's code of conduct states that consultations should last 12 weeks. However, it simply was not possible to do that and to get everything done before the Budget, when the policy was announced. That raises the question whether we are rushing into this somewhat....

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c223-4
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak on the issue of penalties. As with so much in this year's Finance Bill, we have to go back to last year's Bill to gain a full understanding, although I suspect that we shall not see quite the same drama that we saw in...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c220-3
House
House of Commons

Quite.

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c225
House
House of Commons

Sometimes parties in opposition are right. I thought that the Financial Secretary would pick me up on that point, but I did say that the use of such clauses seemed to be more prevalent. That is our concern. They are also more comprehensive. A comparison with last year's Henry VIII...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c225
House
House of Commons

I shall not make any ill-judged remarks comparing my hon. Friend with Henry VIII.

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c225
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend, who makes a very good point. To be fair to the Financial Secretary, I must stop trying to put her into embarrassing positions in respect of the Prime Minister's comments, as she had to cope with denials over the losers in the 10p...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c225-7
House
House of Commons

Is the right hon. Lady saying that she was wrong when she raised those points in opposition?

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c235
House
House of Commons

As ever, the Financial Secretary presents her case in a reasonable tone, but I will disappoint her as I have not been convinced by her arguments about protecting Parliament's position in scrutinising legislation in this area or about the concerns that the consultation has been insufficient and the measures have...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c236
House
House of Commons