Skip to main content

1-20 of 202 results for subject:"Renewable energy"

Legislation X
European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08 (202)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I, too, some time in the past had something to do with energy policy, and at some moments this afternoon I could have shut my eyes and heard the mellifluous tones of a Secretary of State for Energy who has not yet been quoted, Mr Anthony Wedgwood Benn, because most...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1031-2
House
House of Lords

I, too, am not a lawyer, but I nevertheless support the amendment of my noble friend Lord Blackwell. I was interested by the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, who correctly pointed out that if the ordinary man—I think he meant the man on the Clapham omnibus—were asked whether...

Member
Viscount Trenchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1067-8
House
House of Lords

Yes, the European Court has the final word—I am not quite sure what point the noble Lord was trying to make. However, I know that we want to move on, so let me just say that the implications of the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Owen, are sufficiently...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1071-2
House
House of Lords

We have had an extremely interesting contribution from the noble Lord, Lord Owen. It produced strong reactions from the lawyers present, all of whom talked with great precision, authority and emphasis. None the less, I doubt whether the argument will end with this particular debate. The noble Lord, Lord Owen,...

Member
Lord Lamont of Lerwick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1068
House
House of Lords

I have two examples. I used the one about IT software; the other was that if we were to withdraw from our involvement in an agency there would be consequential costs in bringing our staff home. As the noble Lord would expect, I had asked, ““Can we think of examples?””,...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1055
House
House of Lords

I welcome all movements on this front. In fact, the curious situation is that the British Government, through the mouths of the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, are urging that the European Union should look at its biofuels policy again. The noble Baroness indicates that some second...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1038-9
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister be amused to hear that he reminds me of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, who, standing where the Minister is standing at the Dispatch Box during our debates on Maastricht, said exactly the same about doubts that we raised on the future of...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1036
House
House of Lords

This intervention is too long.

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1029
House
House of Lords

Why not?

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1036
House
House of Lords

Because the phrase ““a spirit of solidarity”” is a repetition of a phrase that appears in Article 2 of the treaty and does not overcome the article and the declaration that I have already quoted. That is certainly the Government’s view.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1036
House
House of Lords

I am cautious in how I reply, but my understanding is that that is the position. There are no proposals to be taken under the new energy article, but the Lisbon treaty provides what I continue to describe as a legal base for future action on energy security and promoting...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1034
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I am confused and muddled; the noble Lord is, as always, making a very reasonable case for the treaty’s provisions on energy. But if they are so reasonable, why did the Government work so hard to prevent them being included? Was it not one of their objectives not to...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1034
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord misses very little. The noble Lord, Lord Howell, could not resist raising that point in moving the amendment, for which I do not blame him. Perhaps I may come to that point later. I hope that I have explained the point raised by my noble friend Lord...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1034-5
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his helpful reassurances but can he explain exactly the language in Article 87 of the Lisbon treaty which states that in areas of supply difficulty the commission may take whatever measures are necessary without prejudice to other procedures provided for in the treaties? Does that...

Member
Lord Blackwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1035
House
House of Lords

Well, if it was Morrison, never mind; it was the same nationalist argument. When we joined the European Economic Community, we also joined not only the ECSC but EURATOM. We have been in international energy co-operation regionally and, since 1973, globally with the International Energy Agency. We have to be...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1030-1
House
House of Lords

No one is arguing that we should not co-operate. The point is that in all these agreements we are able to operate as a sovereign state and decide to enter or leave them. The question here is whether we are ceding power and will not be able to act in...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1031
House
House of Lords

I recall reading that in 1950, when the first west European institution—the old European Coal and Steel Community—was being negotiated, many in the then Labour Government thought that Britain ought to join it. They recognised that we did not have a purely national energy market, as we imported oil and...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1030
House
House of Lords

That was Morrison.

Member
Lord Radice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1030
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has raised this again. Does he accept that there is a difference between an agreement that we enter into as a sovereign nation, which we can exit at our choice but where the UK Government still controls national interest, and a policy where we may not be...

Member
Lord Blackwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1032
House
House of Lords

It is not different in kind if we have accepted it as an international obligation. It is different in kind in the period before we accept it. In the period before we accept it as an international obligation, it is up to us. We can veto it, or not join...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2008
Reference
701 c1032
House
House of Lords