Skip to main content

1-20 of 194 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Legislation X
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08 (194)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A net nil. I concede, although I want to study what the Minister said. I am pleased that he has taken the trouble to try to explain the issue. I do not understand why it has changed after three years; if it is that good, it should be a policy...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c304GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his considerations. It would be useful to probe a little further into the size the Minister envisages for the committee. There must be a limit to how big or small it will be. Turning to Amendments Nos. 15 and 16, if we are going to...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c306GC
House
House of Lords

We are all grateful to the Minister; he is generous and helps us in every way he can. However, he has not persuaded me that this is a clean break. I do not think he has convinced any of the people I have talked to who work within the professional...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c302-3GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right; I accept that point. I suggest, however, that what would make the system more acceptable for those who use it would be better assessment arrangements that did not rely upon income details from people who did not want to engage with the commission and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c301GC
House
House of Lords

We are getting into a bit of a dialogue here. Nothing comes to a grinding halt. The CSA will cease to be key operationally when there is a transfer of functions to the commission. Lots of things then follow on from that. When we get to 2010 we will get...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c296GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out ““a body corporate”” and insert ““an Executive Agency under the control of the Secretary of State”” The noble Lord said: This is another important aspect of the Bill that takes us into the question of whether we...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c289-92GC
House
House of Lords

I reject the assertion that there will be operational pressure on the commission to reduce the case load. There are two parts to the scheme, as I mentioned earlier. The first is to encourage voluntary arrangements, which is part—just part—of the agenda to encourage parental responsibility; the second is to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c288GC
House
House of Lords

I do not know whether the management information that would enable us to judge that will be available. I am not seeking to impute bad faith to the professionals who operate the commission. If the CMEC scheme becomes understood, and is known to be efficient and to provide a good...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c288-9GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble Baroness that the framework she has just described is precisely what DCSF is engaged in. It is looking at supporting parents and promoting the welfare of children across a whole range of issues; but it is right, as part of that Government-wide approach, to be...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c287-8GC
House
House of Lords

I do not know the intricacies of this system. It is not something that I have specialised in; but it is very distressing to have a situation where there is a declaration at the beginning of the existing legislation, as the noble Lord confirmed. My noble friend said what the...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c287GC
House
House of Lords

That is a rather big question which I think we will pick up as we go through our deliberations, but I made the point for a number of reasons. We are increasing the benefit disregard from nil in respect of old scheme cases to £20, from £10 to £20 for...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c286-7GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has just said that the original intention of the 1991 Act was—again I am paraphrasing—to claw back benefits, and to a great extent he is probably correct. But as I said earlier, we are where we are. The noble Lord gave that as the reason why absent...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c286GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause— ““Objectives of the Act (1) The primary objectives of this Act are— (a) to affirm the right of children to be maintained by their parents; (b) to affirm the obligation of parents to maintain their children; (c)...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c275-80GC
House
House of Lords

I support the intention of the noble Lords, Lord Kirkwood and Lord Addington, to explore the purposes of the Bill with their proposed new clause, which puts the child right at the centre. Noble Lords will be aware that the church has always believed that the best environment for children...

Member
Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c283-4GC
House
House of Lords

I like objective clauses. We have normally failed to get them into a Bill but, where they have been put in, such as in the Education Act, they are enormously useful. I am not sure that the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, has this one entirely right, and I do not...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c283GC
House
House of Lords

I certainly do not disagree that there should be definitions of responsibility, the engagement of parents and the welfare of their children, all of which goes beyond a definition of maintenance whether it is focused just in terms of money or on a more general provision of facilities. But I...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c324GC
House
House of Lords

In the light of Clause 4, which I have not given sufficient attention to—I apologise—the concerns of the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, and the Minister seem to me to be rather less, because the commission must take the steps it considers appropriate for the purpose...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c323-4GC
House
House of Lords

I am reluctant to get involved in this legal argument that is raging over my head. Australians have found a way to fix some of these problems and Professor Patrick Parkinson came over here. Andrew Selous and Paul Rowen in the Public Bill Committee identified some important policy moves and...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c319-20GC
House
House of Lords

I accept that, but the point is that most of the children whom the agency will be working with will not come from a divorce situation because usually the parent with care will not be on benefits and therefore the children will already be within the voluntary system. The children...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c318-9GC
House
House of Lords

I asked the Minister whether he would add to the consideration, because surely there will be intercourse—I suppose that is the word—between the department of the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, and the Minister’s own department on exactly this subject. Given what the Minister has just said, would he consider adding...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
698 c325GC
House
House of Lords