Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Information

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the amendment stands also in the name of my noble friend Lord Peston. It is fairly self-evident, referring to,

“the need to inform and educate consumers”—

which I assume everybody is in favour of—

“with special emphasis on the unavoidability of some risk”.

Life is full of risk, certainly in the financial...

Member
Lord Barnett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 cc257-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it strikes me that the Bill slightly buries “buyer beware”, which was in FiSMA, and that we are creeping towards a culture where a lot of people think that if they lose money on any investment they are entitled to compensation. I do not wish to be overly...

Member
Lord Flight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c258
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was delighted to add my name to that of the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, on this amendment. We go back a very long way to when I first entered the Department of Trade and Industry. The position of director-general of fair trading was coming up for renewal...

Member
Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 cc258-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I supplement what my noble friend Lord Barnett and others have said about the built-in risk of pretty well every financial instrument that one might acquire. This amendment is very much in line with that made earlier by the noble Lord, Lord Flight, on education. Therefore, again I...

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c259
House
House of Lords

I shall make a couple of comments in favour of the amendment. As I understand it, its general sense is to state that there is a duty of care. The medical profession and the legal profession have an explicit duty of care. An interesting seminar brought together economists, lawyers and...

Member
Lord May of Oxford (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c259
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much support the amendment, as I said when speaking to my noble friend’s amendment a few minutes ago. There is a real danger of failing to distinguish between risk and fraud. They get intermingled in the public’s mind. Clearly, fraud is absolutely unacceptable and needs to...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c260
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was particularly grateful to hear the words of the noble Lord, Lord May of Oxford. We will shortly come to a specific amendment about a duty of care. I hope that he will be here to repeat his words in 20 minutes or whenever we reach the...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 cc260-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments is concerned with the information provided to consumers, so that they are able to make empowered choices and decisions. Amendment 104C seeks to add a new ‘have regard’ subsection to the list of matters that the FCA must consider in advancing its consumer protection...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c262
House
House of Lords

That is right, my Lords. In fact, when we debated the previous group of amendments I spoke about the deliberations that the Department for Education is going through on that exact point, so I thank my noble friend for that.

The FCA will set the conduct-of-business regime within which firms will...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 cc262-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in agreeing with my noble friends Lord Barnett and Lord Peston in their amendment, I agree also with what the noble Lord, Lord Flight, has just said. He did not used the famous Latin phrase “caveat emptor”, perhaps because we are not supposed to use Latin any more—that...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c258
House
House of Lords