Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:Redundancy

Legislation X
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Member X
Vincent Cable

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Cable, Vincent (47)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Postal Services Bill 2010-12 (47)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We certainly do not have any doctrinal or other objections to foreign ownership. I spend a lot of my time trying to attract foreign investors to the country, but, as far as the royal charter is concerned, it is clear that the association with the monarchy is probably the most...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c356-7
House
House of Commons

Of course it does need to be done anyway, but as I explained a few moments ago, the key point about bringing in private capital is that it brings in investment as well as new and better methods of management. There are separate issues involved. However, the right hon. Gentleman...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c360-1
House
House of Commons

We cannot do it in that way. Of course, other companies have access to the market, subject to strict conditions, but we envisage that Royal Mail will continue to be the universal service provider: that is the basis on which we are proceeding. The Bill puts in place three new...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c361
House
House of Commons

It is a solution on which I hope that Members in all parts of the House can agree, including the right hon. Gentleman.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c360
House
House of Commons

I understand that my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary is very familiar with this and has spent a lot of time talking to the pension trustees. There is a whole set of reasons behind this deficit, one of which is that employees are living longer; another is that the pension fund...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c360
House
House of Commons

Yes, it is true, but the liabilities are much bigger. I shall explain in a moment how we will deal with the assets. The pension deficit, which is the starting point, threatens the very existence of the company. It is draining cash from Royal Mail's modernisation and preventing it from...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c358-60
House
House of Commons

I believe I have given my hon. Friend that reassurance. Royal Mail will not subsidise its competitors, protections will be built in and there will be a genuine regulatory level playing field in a way that has not been quite true in the past. Previous attempts at legislation on Royal...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c362-3
House
House of Commons

I am not making these commitments as political commitments. They are enshrined in regulation—regulation that will be strengthened and has the force of law. Of course, that is political in the widest sense if one regards this Parliament as political. The protections are going to be legal and regulatory; this...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c361-2
House
House of Commons

I will take one more intervention and then move to a conclusion.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c362
House
House of Commons

I am going to go on to explain the new mechanism. Would the hon. Gentleman like to wait until I reach the end, or does he wish to intervene on that particular point?

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c358
House
House of Commons

All right.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c358
House
House of Commons

That has been happening for 13 years and it has not solved the problem. The problem is deteriorating and the Government cannot provide the investment capital. The right hon. Gentleman is right about public opinion. The public are concerned about the universal service obligation. That is the essence of public...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c356
House
House of Commons

I am not familiar with the details of the argument in that case. I was referring to the fact that there has been a constructive relationship between the union and management on modernisation, but such issues do exist, and they are essentially commercial ones that must be dealt with by...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c357-8
House
House of Commons

I will finish this section, then I will take the intervention from the right hon. Gentleman, who I know was a Minister and had close involvement with this matter. Some Members of the House will say that Royal Mail can modernise and survive while remaining in the public sector. They...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c355-6
House
House of Commons

As I say, investment capital availability ultimately comes down to the individual decision of individual postmasters. As my right hon. Friend the Member for Wokingham (Mr Redwood) pointed out, these are individual investment decisions, but the network will in future be put on a structurally sound, properly funded basis. That...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c354
House
House of Commons

I will press on. The hon. Gentleman has had his say. In addition to funding, we are injecting new ideas. We have been re-thinking the role of post offices in providing Government and banking services, and we will be coming back shortly with a fuller statement on that problem, setting...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c354-5
House
House of Commons

No. The relationship between Royal Mail and the Post Office rests on two things—first, on mutual interest. They have strong mutual interests and depend on each other. Secondly, there is a contractual relationship. This will not change as a result of the separation of the two. Public ownership did not...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c355
House
House of Commons

Obviously, such detailed matters will need to be resolved as the process of separation continues. It is a practical issue and, as it is a commercial matter, Post Office and Royal Mail will look for the most sensible, practical, least cost arrangement. For the foreseeable future, Royal Mail will be...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c355
House
House of Commons

I will take interventions at the end of the next section of my speech. I have already given the hon. Gentleman answers to some of his questions. Communities up and down the country have rightly been concerned about the shrinkage of the network over previous years, and despite the efforts...

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c352-3
House
House of Commons

Yes, indeed. That is the outcome. For the past decade I and many on the Opposition Benches have been involved in fighting for our local post offices. In many cases, constituencies have seen the loss of a dozen post offices. That will come to an end.

Member
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
517 c353
House
House of Commons