Skip to main content

1-20 of 255 results for subject:Finance

Legislation X
Pensions Bill (HL) 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Pensions Bill (HL) 2010-12 (255)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The hon. Gentleman takes us back into the mists of history, but surely today's announcement can be warmly welcomed by all Members on both sides of the House? The right hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne) describes this announcement as ““just a sticking plaster””, however. I cannot think...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c780
House
House of Commons

I should like to make a little more progress first. I shall be happy to give way after that. In 2005, in the days when the Conservative party was trying desperately to shift the perception that it had not changed, the present Prime Minister said:"““If you put eight Conservative men...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c779
House
House of Commons

I hear what the hon. Lady says, but will she explain to the 300,000 women who will have to wait longer than anybody else to receive their state pension—between a year and 18 months longer—why they should have to pay more of the burden than anyone else?

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c790
House
House of Commons

In the event that a modification in the timetable is necessary, and in answer to the questions about where the savings would come from, it may well be that the Government would do better to speed up the timetable for a state pension age of 67 and 68. That is...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c786
House
House of Commons

Will you give way on that point?

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c794
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes the point clearly and soundly. My right hon. Friend the Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms) made it absolutely clear this evening how unfair this Bill still is, and why anyone with any sense of justice and fairness should vote against it. It is outrageous for...

Member
Nicholas Dakin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c863
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the politicians who sat in this House when I was born and was growing up in this country did not decide that the burden of debt was so great that they could not introduce the reforms that brought us the welfare state. It was not their...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c857
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Glenda Jackson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c833
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes her point with greater eloquence than I could muster, and she sums up the crux of our case. Labour set two tests for the Pensions Bill, and the Government continue to fail both of them. They fail the first test of giving fair and due notice,...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c781
House
House of Commons

I am very pleased that my hon. Friend has taken up his new post. I am sure he agrees that a balance must be struck between dealing with rising longevity by having a plan to increase the state pension age over time, and offering short-term certainty to women who need...

Member
Kate Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c781
House
House of Commons

Perhaps because I have a historian's perspective, I do not consider 35 years ago to be the mists of time. I think that that era is relevant to our discussion of pensions today. We cannot sit still and do nothing on pensions. We accept that changes have to be made;...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c780
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman did not respond to the earlier point about needing to strike a balance between what this country can afford economically and what any Government might like to do. As Age UK has said, £1 billion to help 250,000 women is a big step forward. We should welcome...

Member
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c781
House
House of Commons

What the hon. Gentleman has said is interesting, given that when the Labour party was last in power, it did not really bother about saving for tomorrow. This is what his predecessor said when the point was raised in Committee:"““this is outside the period of the comprehensive spending review and...

Member
Lord Sharma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c779-80
House
House of Commons

That was not so much an intervention as a speech. The fact remains that the difference between the Government's proposals and ours is £10 billion over 10 years. That is £1 billion a year. Is the hon. Gentleman really saying that a saving of that kind cannot be found in...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c780
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for acknowledging that the Government have moved some way on the transitional arrangements, but may I ask him a question that I asked his predecessor, the hon. Member for Leeds West (Rachel Reeves), in Committee? How does he expect to fund the changes...

Member
Lord Sharma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c779
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that the savings that we are discussing have absolutely nothing to do with the deficit? They will accrue from 2016 onwards.

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c779
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for his intervention. I am sure that his son is getting a better education than I could manage to provide, as he rather ungallantly suggested. The fact is that this is one 1,000th of the £1.3 trillion debt, and the issue of one of...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c782
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but I have given way enough and I have to make progress.

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c782
House
House of Commons

Actually, I did answer that point very simply. This has nothing to do with the deficit, and there is a £10 billion difference between our position and that of the Government over the 10 years after 2016, which amounts to £1 billion a year. If the hon. Gentleman is saying...

Member
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c781
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman mentions that the deficit will be brought down by 2015-16. That may be the case, but this country will still owe £1.14 trillion or £1.15 trillion. Does he think it fair and just that our children and their children, and probably their children, will be taking on...

Member
Marcus Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2011
Reference
533 c781
House
House of Commons