Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for subject:Finance

Legislation X
Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12
Subject X
Local government

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12 (50)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I declare an interest in this matter as an elected member of the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk. It gives me great pleasure to support this timely legislation. Although I did not speak when the orders were debated on 22 March, I attended the debate....

Member
Viscount Ullswater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1817-8
House
House of Lords

Yes, indeed, my Lords. I thought I had recognised at the start of my presentation that that had changed the basis on which we are debating the Bill. I am simply reiterating why unitary status for Exeter and Norwich should be supported. This Bill will deny those two cities that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1806
House
House of Lords

On a point of information, it was not contested. We withdrew from that examination and therefore the arguments were not aired and fully debated, because we knew about the situation with the judicial review.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1818
House
House of Lords

Trap or not, we ended up with an examination to which no further evidence was given. The two memorials were laid. They were withdrawn, but because they had been there, they were considered. Effectively, the hearing took place without the arguments that had been put forward by the noble Baroness....

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1834
House
House of Lords

Is it not the case that the Merits Committee raised an enormous number of questions about whether the evidence was satisfactory and left the House to decide? I have never known a Merits Committee raise so many questions and doubts about a statutory instrument, and the House took a very...

Member
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1832
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I retrieved the notes that I had written for the original Second Reading debate in this House, I saw that they start by saying, "Congratulate Baroness Hanham". I had intended at the time to congratulate her on her new job, but time has moved on, so perhaps...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1816-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as former leader of Norwich City Council, and also a former Norfolk county councillor. Perhaps I may add that nothing I will say in any way casts aspersions on the integrity of my fellow Norfolk Peers or indeed on the Minister herself, whom I...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1811-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, whatever I say about the Bill, it is only fair to say at the outset that I welcome the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, to the Front Bench. She has been an effective speaker for her party in the past and I am sure that she will be a...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1818-21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all I would say is that the Examiners have examined it. Their report has been published and the Bill is not hybrid. For all those reasons, I am delighted to support my noble friend Lady Hanham, who introduced this Bill.

Member
Viscount Ullswater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1818
House
House of Lords

I apologise for interrupting the noble Lord, but he referred to the question that I posed in my presentation of whether the Lib Dems were supporting this. In fact, the question that I posed of the Minister was whether, because the 2007 Act is not amended by this provision, it...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1822
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin, as I always do, and as I did when we debated the orders on 22 March, by declaring my personal interest as a councillor in a unitary authority, which is a role that I have had for more than 35 years. On 22 March I said—and...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1821-2
House
House of Lords

He is bitterly opposed to this.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1823
House
House of Lords

It is probably inappropriate for me to comment on the Minister’s answer before she has given it. I may well have another opportunity to do that. Perhaps I may answer the noble Lord indirectly. As a believer in unitary government, I really believe and would expect the Minister herself, having...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1822-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord seems to be arguing so passionately for their cause that I wonder whether he feels that the Merits Committee got it wrong.

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1830
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister—I am sorry, not the Minister; I am out of date. I thank the noble Lord for giving way. I answered that question. I said that in historic Devon there are two unitary authorities: Torbay, which has not been successful, and Plymouth, which struggles hugely. There are...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1829
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I note that that is the noble Lord’s view, but I doubt that it is universally held. I accept that he is entitled to his view, as I am entitled to my view and this side is entitled to its view on these issues. The situation is that...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1829-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the first time that I have spoken on this issue. I must admit that it is difficult to find something to say that has not already been said. Both sides of the argument are polarised—entrenched in their view. No amount of argument, however good, will change...

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1824-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had an interesting and at times passionate debate. Before I go further, I will again welcome the Minister to her new role and endorse the comments made about her by my noble friend Lady Hollis of Heigham. We have heard contributions from different sides of the...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1826-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, he is a solicitor in Norwich but is the MP for North Norfolk and has no formal connection at all to the city.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1823
House
House of Lords

I do not want to detain your Lordships’ House. This has distracted us but I think the main arguments have been clear. Most of this debate has dwelt on the past. I have been guilty of that, too. We now need to look to the future. I do not think...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2010
Reference
719 c1823-4
House
House of Lords