Skip to main content

1-20 of 862 results for subject:Abuse

Department X
Wales Office

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Wales Office (862)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Wales Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 March 2016
Reference
DEP2016-0324
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the Macur Review into historic child abuse.

Diolch yn fawr iawn, Sir Edward. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship today. I am sure we are all saddened by the news we are hearing from Brussels.

I will start by putting on...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c549WH
House
House of Commons

I am sure that, like me, the hon. Lady has already had survivors contact her to say how disappointed they were. The report was their hope that there would be recognition, but all it does is leave unanswered questions still unanswered.

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c549WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. It seems to have been very much a matter of process and documentation, with survivors and victims as a second consideration. I will return to that.

The report culminates in a bland list of eight conclusions, which mainly state that Waterhouse was necessary, agree with the instigation of this...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc549-550WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Lady on securing this important debate. One of the few positives to come out of Waterhouse was the setting up of the Children’s Commissioner for Wales. Given the strong statement that the commissioner made, does she agree that the Government must be clear about the methodology...

Member
Albert Owen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c550WH
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely. I will refer to what the Children’s Commissioner for Wales said anon and I hope that the Minister will be in a position to respond to her call as well as those we are making today.

The previous Secretary of State also said that the rationale behind making...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc550-1WH
House
House of Commons

I interviewed six young men some years ago in the Cynon Valley. Those boys were taken to north Wales, and that may be true of boys from other parts of south Wales as well. This is talked about as the north Wales abuse inquiry, but it is sometimes forgotten that...

Member
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c551WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. There is a history, as the right hon. Lady mentioned, of a loss of evidence associated with child abuse. I refer also to the Geoffrey Dickens dossier. I ask the Minister to consider whether victims and survivors of abuse in Wales—not only north Wales, of course—can, in all...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc551-3WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important point about children’s voices being heard. In many of these cases, because the children were in a home, they were not considered to have any value, and that is why they were treated in the way they were. That, in some ways, is the...

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c553WH
House
House of Commons

One thing that has saddened me is perceiving how vulnerable these children were, which made them vulnerable to abuse in the first place, and how that abuse in turn has affected them for the rest of their lives and in part condemns them to being unreliable witnesses. We have not...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c553WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on the speech she is making. In terms of process, is she surprised, as I am, at the paucity of reference to the linguistic context in which this happened in Wales—specifically in north Wales and north-west Wales, where a percentage of the children would be...

Member
Hywel Williams (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c553WH
House
House of Commons

Indeed. We are talking about children’s voices, and one aspect of that is whether people are able to use their first language, in which they are most confident and express their emotions most fluently.

Finally, one critical lesson to be learned—I again echo the Children’s Commissioner for Wales—is that reviews from...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc553-4WH
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to see you in the chair, Sir Edward. May I take this opportunity to congratulate the Minister on his appointment? This is not the easiest of debates with which to start. I also congratulate the hon. Member for Dwyfor Meirionnydd (Liz Saville Roberts) on her studied and...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc554-5WH
House
House of Commons

If I may correct the hon. Gentleman, Peter Morrison’s name does appear in the body of the report. It is important that the hon. Gentleman clarifies that, because it is not redacted.

Member
David Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c555WH
House
House of Commons

It appears in one part of the report, but it is also redacted in other parts of it. His name appears in the introduction, I believe, but in the part that relates to establishment figures, his name is redacted.

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c555WH
House
House of Commons

The point I was seeking to make is that his name is not wholly redacted, and since the hon. Gentleman is making a speech that covers very important matters, it is necessary to clarify that point.

Member
David Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c555WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that clarification, but in the chapter that relates to establishment figures, the two names that I referred to are not redacted, whereas Peter Morrison’s name is. It is very difficult to deduce a line of principle to see why someone made that decision. I think we...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 cc555-6WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a valuable contribution to the debate. Does he think that handing an unredacted copy to the Goddard inquiry will affect the delay in anyone having any chance of finding out what the redactions are? The Goddard inquiry is very optimistically expected to report in two...

Member
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c556WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a valid point. The report took over three years and I would be astonished—to use that phrase again—if the Goddard review reported within that timeframe. That is why it is incumbent on us to ask these questions. It is unacceptable that only members of the Government...

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c556WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that another disturbing element of the report is the handling of the documentation of the inquiry: its transmission from the Welsh Office to the Welsh Assembly Government, and what happened when it was in the hands of the Welsh Assembly Government? Does he agree that...

Member
David Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2016
Reference
607 c556WH
House
House of Commons