Skip to main content

1-100 of 737 results for subject:Schools

Department X
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (737)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Liz Kendall
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses); Command papers
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
CP 1643
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

This Government are boosting digital and AI skills by embedding media literacy across all key stages, including by introducing an AI-inclusive computing GCSE and a ÂŁ20 million early careers jobs alliance. We will ensure that digital inclusion is fundamental as the Government work to develop digital access to public services through digital ID. These measures will support children and all people to access public services when they need them; they will be personalised, joined up and involve less faff.

Answered by
James Frith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c897
House
House of Commons

T6

.

Jack Abbott (Ipswich) (Lab/Co-op):

I recently visited Northgate high school in Ipswich with the Children’s Commissioner. As ever, the pupils were thoughtful and articulate about what they needed for the future, but the subject of digital and AI came up a lot. They said that they need greater access to public services and skilling up for future employment. Will the Minister outline what the Government are doing to ensure that pupils can access those public services as well as the important digital and AI skills that they desperately need?

Asked by
Jack Abbott (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c897
House
House of Commons

Perhaps if I continue with my comments, the noble Baroness can intervene if appropriate.

I reassure all noble Lords that the child would almost certainly be caught by the Government’s proposed consent measure due to a child protection plan, or by being a looked-after child, and therefore education provision would be...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1540-2
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendments 2, 5 and 16 not insisted on. Lords amendment 17 not insisted on and Commons amendment 17B in lieu agreed to. Lords amendments 19, 21 and 37 not insisted on. Lords amendment 38 insisted on and Commons amendments 38A, 38B, 38C...

Lead member
Lord Collins of Highbury; Baroness Blake of Leeds; Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Answering member
Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Education; Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1532
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Motion A, I shall speak also to Motions B, K and K1. In this group we will be debating amendments made in this House relating to child protection plans, multi-agency child protection teams and local authority consent for children not in school. For each, I will...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1532-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to this group of amendments. I thank the Minister in her absence for the meetings we have had away from your Lordships’ Chamber. Clearly, protecting our young people is close to all our hearts and is something that we will keep a watching brief...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1534
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to Motion K1 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Barran. I thank the Bill team and the Minister for our very useful meeting yesterday, and, as ever, I must declare my interest as a state school teacher.

When we talked to the Bill...

Member
Lord Hampton (Crossbench; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1533-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Hampton, has just said. As a family judge, I had a number of cases where children

had been on protection orders—and, in particular, supervision orders—and I vividly recall an appalling case in Liverpool where there was a continuing supervision order that...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1534
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will confine myself briefly to supporting Motion B. It is commonly agreed now that the pilots of the pathfinder model in selected family courts have been a success and represent the way ahead. This model has been shown to reduce delays significantly and has forced the focus...

Member
Lord Meston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1535
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will o speak to Motion K1, tabled by my noble friend Lady Barran. The Government are rightly acting to give local authorities the power to prevent children subject to a child protection plan being withdrawn from school. However, the scope of the Bill is clearly too limited,...

Member
Baroness Spielman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1535-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to see that, in Motion K1, the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, has reduced the issue to being about only Section 31 and that she has provided a carve-out, as it were, for adoption. Imagine if you adopted a two year-old who had been in care...

Member
Lord Crisp (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1535-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her comments regarding Motion A and the commitment to strengthen statutory guidance, and for the publication of interim findings in relation to Motion B for the multi-agency child protection teams. To the noble Lord, Lord Meston, I say that there are multiple pathfinders,...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1537-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am exceptionally grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to the debate. I recognise the commitment and contribution they have all made during the passage of the Bill. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Mohammed, for not pursuing any of the points further, as he said.

To...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1539-1540
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Baroness acknowledge that in the case of Sara Sharif and many other children—she will be aware of the report into the 41 children who were home-educated and were either killed or seriously harmed—the current system clearly does not work and that this small but important loophole could...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1540
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I pick up on that point?

Member
Lord Crisp (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1540
House
House of Lords

I cannot express my sadness enough about the issues that the noble Baroness raises, but I am seeking to reassure her and the House that the provisions we are bringing in will be sufficient as we move forward. That is the issue. I think the Minister she referred to from...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1540
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, but the meticulous detail in the letter did not refer anywhere to children in care or those who had been in care proceedings. It referred to my previous amendment and children who were classified as being in need. I will let the noble Baroness progress.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1540
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1542
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1542
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Motion C and shall speak also to Motions D, E, F and F1. In this group, we will be debating amendments made in this House relating to the adoption and special guardianship support fund, sibling contact, regional co-operation arrangements and deprivation of liberty. For...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1542-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Motion D and briefly to Motion F. I place on record the fact that I am extremely grateful to the Government for bringing forward Amendment 17B in lieu, in response to the amendments that I tabled in Committee and on Report. It is a...

Member
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1544-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to be brief in agreeing with what the noble Baroness, Lady Tyler, just said and in welcoming Motion D, because the Government’s proposed amendment in lieu, which relates to sibling contact, is to be welcomed; indeed, it is a pleasant surprise. It promotes the local...

Member
Lord Meston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1545
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I chaired a Select Committee on adoption some years ago and very much welcome this sibling amendment. It is absolutely excellent. I remember we met a number of children who were in care. One boy of 15, with four

younger brothers and sisters, said to us, “No one...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1545
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like other noble Lords, we very much welcome the Government’s amendment in relation to sibling contact and hope very much it makes a tangible difference in practice. I will speak briefly to my Motion F1, which relates to how we can provide the highest-quality care for the most...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1546
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for all the contributions to this debate. I start by thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Tyler, for her comments, and also say that I am totally confident she will keep a good check on how this goes forward. I am very appreciative of her role.

The...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1546-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1547
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1548
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1548
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1548
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in speaking to Motion G, I will also speak to Motions G1, G2, N and N1. Lords Amendment 37 requires the Secretary of State to introduce regulations that prohibit under 18s from using VPNs. Amendment 38 requires the UK Chief Medical Officers to publish advice about children’s use...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1550-2
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Nash

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1552
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Motion G1, concerning my social media amendment, as an amendment to Motion G, I will support the spirit of the Motion tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron.

I believe we need a dual-track approach. I pay tribute to those noble tech Lords, many of whom are...

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1550-4
House
House of Lords

I support my noble friend Lord Nash and Motion G1 following his amazingly powerful speech. I also suggest that Commons Amendments 38A and 38B be rejected on constitutional grounds as they would give Ministers unacceptably wide Henry VIII powers. I declare my membership of the Constitution Committee, but of course...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1554-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Nash, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bellamy; I will reiterate the points that they have been making.

The amendments pose the question of how best to make meaningful change to online safety law for our children. We must choose...

Member
Lord Carter of Haslemere (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1555-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, although the Government’s amendments have been put forward as a signal of their determination to act, sadly they commit to nothing. They simply buy the Minister a bit more time and the opportunity, at some unknown moment in the future, to push through a compromise half-measure with minimal...

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1556-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Motion G2 is in my name. I shall speak also to all the other amendments in this group.

I think we have acknowledged that everybody in this House wishes to protect children, but there is a vast difference of opinion in respect of our approach and the Government’s sense...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1555-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add one point to the powerful speeches that have been made in support of the noble Lord, Lord Nash. It is very important that noble Lords understand that the Minister is inviting the House to support Amendments 38A and 38B, neither of which imposes any obligation whatsoever...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1558
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I pick up on one issue that the Minister mentioned in her opening speech. To paraphrase, she said, “If, after consultation, there is a decision to act”. I hope that she is getting the sense tonight that the House is already very much of the opinion that it...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1558-1560
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the government consultation, but I am distressed by how very wide its scope is and, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, said, how very vague the outcomes seem to be.

The arguments that I put forward in my AI chatbot amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1560
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as mentioned earlier, Google and Meta were today found in the Supreme Court of California to be guilty of causing pain and suffering to a plaintiff who had brought the case. The jury has initially ruled that $3 million in damages will be paid for that pain and...

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1560
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief, because others have spoken so eloquently. I support my noble friend Lord Nash in his heroic efforts to stop

social media for under-16s, and I support the spirit of the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, as well.

I feel that I must represent...

Member
Baroness Bertin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1560-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support very strongly the noble Lord, Lord Nash, and the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron. I am not going to say anything about it because it has been very well said already by other Members of this House. I also support what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick,...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1562
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to talk about the consultation, which is fundamentally not fit for purpose, but other noble Lords have covered that well, so I want to make a couple of other points about the way in which the Government are failing to understand the impact of social...

Member
Baroness Cass (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1562
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not trying to deprive other noble Lords of the chance to speak, but the idea that we go to the Front Benches because we have all heard these arguments before is not fair, because the Government have put before us the widest set of proposals that...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1562-3
House
House of Lords

Nobody here is saying that consultations are all a waste of time. What we are saying is that this particular consultation is deeply flawed in its construction.

Member
Baroness Cass (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1563
House
House of Lords

People from different political parties have pointed out that we all know that consultations are a way of kicking the ball down the road and are not serious. Call me naive, but I am just saying that I thought they were.

It is very important, as we make the decisions about...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1563
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has said a couple of times that my noble friend Lord Nash introduced his amendment on Report. It was tabled in Committee and on Report and it was debated at Second Reading. Maybe she would like to correct her remarks.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1563
House
House of Lords

I had a lot of sympathy with the Government’s position on Report of trying to think about whether we could use consultation before embarking on drastic measures. I am just disappointed that the Government have brought forward at such a late stage these amendments that potentially give draconian powers to...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1563-4
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Baroness say why the bar for evidence in this area of policy is after the event? Most critical industries have to abide by standards and they have to prove that a product is safe. Why are we, with all the bereaved families standing in the Gallery, talking...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1564
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is perfectly reasonable to raise that. It is certainly contested in academic studies, even if it is, like, “Never mind the evidence, the product should be safe anyway”. I am suggesting that evidence-based policy requires evidence and that, when the evidence is at least contested and there...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1564
House
House of Lords

It is a long way from a ban on all teenagers going on the internet. It is highly selective for those apps that are clearly harmful.

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1564
House
House of Lords

I do not want to delay, and I have written a lot more.

At the very least, to finish off, I would have thought that, before Parliament embarks on such drastic measures in delegated power form, handing these powers over to the Government—I note that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, said...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1565
House
House of Lords

I keep being interrupted. In Australia, after the ban more than 50% of children are still using social media. Teens are being pushed underground, away from mainstream platforms into darker corners of the internet, without safeguards and with zero moderation. It is risky and dangerous behaviour. Rather than having adult...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1565
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there have been very few speakers from the Labour Benches and I want to make sure that those who are supporting the amendments before the House today understand that, within this party, it is not exactly as was set out by the Minister. There are those of us...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1565-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to sum up this debate briefly, I have nothing new to add. I merely agree with certain noble Lords who have already spoken. As for the Government’s approach, Henry VII’s son is all over it, and that is never a good thing for a Bill. I agree with...

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1566
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief. I shall say a few words on smartphones and Motion N1 in my name. I acknowledge that the Government have made efforts in their new guidance on mobile phones, but their approach does not go far enough to meet the needs of pupils, parents...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1566-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the constructive and heartfelt contributions made in the House today. We have heard a wide range of views, and I reiterate my thanks to noble Lords who have engaged so closely with Ministers in recent weeks as we work through these complex questions. I...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1568
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened to what the Minister has to say, but I have also read the consultation very carefully and listened to the statements made publicly by the DSIT Secretary of State. I can only conclude from those that the Government have no real commitment to do anything...

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1568
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Collins of Highbury

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1569
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Motion H, I shall also speak to Motions H1, J, L, L1 and M. In this group, we are debating amendments relating to school uniforms, published admission numbers and allergies. For each, I will set out the clear rationale as to why the Government cannot accept...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1573-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Mohammed of Tinsley

At end insert “, and do propose Amendment 41B in lieu—

41B: Clause 29, page 50, line 21, at end insert—

“551ZB School uniforms: review of limits on branded items

(1) The Secretary of State must review the effectiveness of measures intended to limit the cost to parents of...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1574-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Motion H1, as we heard earlier, is around the issue of a monetary cap on school uniforms. I will not rehearse the arguments that we have had already in Committee and on Report. However, if the Government are minded to continue to push for a numbers cap,...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1575
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to Motion M. I support the amendments in lieu, Amendments 105B and 105C. I would like to thank the Ministers; I know that the noble Lord, Lord Collins, is here speaking tonight but perhaps he would pass on thanks to both the noble Baroness,...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1575-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, please bear with me again; I will keep to the two-minute limit. I too speak in favour of Amendments 105B and 105C, tabled in lieu in Motion M, and in doing so declare my interest as COO of the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, the UK’s food allergy charity.

I...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of Cradley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1576
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Motion L1, and I am looking round to see where everybody is.

The Minister described Motion L1 as a “last resort” and, when we met them yesterday, the Bill team seemed to think that the example of a highly successful school next to a school...

Member
Lord Hampton (Crossbench; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1576-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, with this reinstatement of her original Amendment 102. I speak as the chairman of an academy trust; I have faced the dead hand of the bureaucratic tidying-up exercise. To the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hampton: just last year,...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1577
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I stand to support the Government in their attempt to create a situation where there is an adequate regulator for school admissions. At a time of greatly falling rolls, particularly in primary, this is especially important, and even more so when there is going to be a much...

Member
Baroness Bousted (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1577-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on these Benches we share the concerns expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Mohammed of Tinsley, about the rigidity of the Government’s approach to trying to control school uniform costs. Indeed, we would have been quite happy if he had wanted to bring back his previous amendment unchanged....

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1578
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone for their contributions. I start by addressing the point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Mohammed. To be clear, and as I said in my opening speech, we will of course monitor the effectiveness of the limit as we

implement it. One of the concerns...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1578-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their contributions to this debate, and particularly the noble Baroness, Lady Barran, for her support. I am still not convinced; the Government need to have another option at the end of it. I would therefore like to test the opinion of the...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has already spoken to Motion J. I beg to move.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have already spoken to Motion K. I beg to move.

Motion K1 (as an amendment to Motion K)

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1579
House
House of Lords

I beg to move Motion K1.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1583
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 102, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 102A.

102A: Because the Amendment imposes inappropriate restrictions on the scope of the adjudicator’s powers to determine school admission numbers under clause 56 and the clause already provides...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1583
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has already spoken to Motion L. I beg to move.

Motion L1 (as an amendment to Motion L)

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1583-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

Leave out from “House” to end and insert “do insist on its Amendment 102.”

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1586
House
House of Lords

I beg to move Motion L1.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1586
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 105, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 105A, and do propose Amendments 105B and 105C in lieu—

105A: Because the Amendment would involve a charge on public funds, and the Commons do not offer any...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1586-1590
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Blake of Leeds

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 106, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 106A.

106A: Because the Commons does not consider the Amendment to be necessary in light of the existing guidance about mobile phones in schools.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1590
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has already spoken to Motion N. I beg to move.

Motion N1 (as an amendment to Motion N)

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1590
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Barran

Leave out from “House” to end and insert “do insist on its Amendment 106.”

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1590
House
House of Lords

I beg to move Motion N1.

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
854 c1590
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 26/03/2026 from Lord Leong to Baroness Keeley regarding questions raised in the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee report on Media literacy debate: including: action plan delivery, youth services, local partnerships and access to media literacy resources, schools, teacher support, Ofcom’s definition of media literacy and role...

Deposited by
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Deposited papers
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0292
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions she has had with Ofcom on taking steps to help prevent schools wars content circulating on social media platforms.

Asked by
Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
118576
House
House of Commons

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by my Right Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP.

The consultation will run for three months, and the government will explain our proposed next steps by the...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written statements
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
HLWS1373
House
House of Lords

Today, we are publishing a landmark consultation on how to give young people the childhood they deserve in an online world. We want every child to enjoy a childhood filled with love, learning and play - one that is just as safe and enriching online as it is offline. To...

Member
Liz Kendall (Labour)
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written statements
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
HCWS1370
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Liz Kendall
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Consultation papers; Command papers
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
CP 1528
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

That is exactly what is happening in Tunbridge Wells. The secondary schools there have moved together to be smartphone-free, and now the primary schools are having that conversation with the parents.

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c283
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention.

Liberal Democrats are calling on the Government to ban harmful social media for under-16-year-olds by introducing age ratings similar to film classifications, so that we can rate the platforms according to the harm they present. We have talked a lot about this, and...

Member
Caroline Voaden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc283-9
House
House of Commons

I have been quite shocked at some of the procedural discussion for several reasons. First, we are acting like this has just come up, but even in the House of Commons under this mandate, as my hon. Friend the Member for South Devon (Caroline Voaden) mentioned, the safer phones Bill...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc289-291
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Member give way?

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c291
House
House of Commons

Very briefly; I want to leave the Minister time.

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c291
House
House of Commons

Australia just bans children from holding accounts; it does not ban them from using any of the platforms. They can still use YouTube; they just cannot have an account.

Member
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c291
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. YouTube is everywhere. It is embedded in almost every website that has videos.

The hon. Member for Aberdeen North (Kirsty Blackman) asked about AI chatbots. In the proposals we put forward in the Lords, the user-to-user services are the AI chatbots. We have highlighted for a long time that potential...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc286-292
House
House of Commons

I thank the Liberal Democrats for securing this debate, although I am slightly disappointed by the way in which that was done. I will not concentrate on procedural issues, but it seems to me that the argument is to give the Liberal Democrats the freedom of the House to introduce...

Member
Ian Murray (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc292-3
House
House of Commons